1 / 22

As-Built Performance of the FPP Spectro-Polarimeter October, 2004 FPP Team

As-Built Performance of the FPP Spectro-Polarimeter October, 2004 FPP Team. Bruce W. Lites 303 497 1517 lites@ucar.edu. FPP Spectro-Polarimeter Performance. AS-BUILT PERFORMANCE OF THE FPP-SP: Slit Scanning mechanism Vignetting as the image is scanned across the slit

Download Presentation

As-Built Performance of the FPP Spectro-Polarimeter October, 2004 FPP Team

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. As-Built Performance of the FPP Spectro-Polarimeter October, 2004 FPP Team Bruce W. Lites 303 497 1517 lites@ucar.edu

  2. FPP Spectro-Polarimeter Performance AS-BUILT PERFORMANCE OF THE FPP-SP: • Slit Scanning mechanism • Vignetting as the image is scanned across the slit • Spectral response function • Signal/Noise (polarimetric precision) • Scattered Light • System Polarization Calibration

  3. Performance Requirements • Polarization Accuracy Matrix (for measured Stokes parameters I,Q,U,V): • Spectrum Range: 6301-6303 Å • Spectral Purity: FWHM  35 mÅ • Spectral Sample:  25 mÅ • Undispersed light scatter: < 0.01 • Polarization signal-to-noise, continuum: > 1000:1

  4. Performance of the Slit Scanning Mechanism • In order to produce maps of the vector magnetic field, the slit scanner should provide regular and reproducible samples of the image plane in the direction perpendicular to the slit. • The slit scanning mechanism nominal range is 2000 steps of 0.16 arcsec on the Sun • Requirements: • Repeatability: 0.33 step • Linearity: no two adjacent steps separated by > 0.32 arcsec • Performance: • Step size on Sun: 0.148 arcsec (average) • Range to limit switches: 3233 steps (478.9 arcsec on Sun; only 320 arcsec are needed)

  5. Theodolite Measurements of Slit Scanner Measured deflection of the beam as a function of slit scan step number. Also shown is the linear fit to the points. (Scan mirror motion of 1 arcsec corrseponds to 1/13.3 arcsec motion of the solar image on the slit) Departures of the measured beam deflection are shown as a function of scan mirror step position. A periodic error in the deflection corresponds to one rotation of the ball screw. Amplitude of this error is of order 1.2 arcsec on the sun per 400 steps (60 arcsec of scanning)

  6. Theodolite Measurements of Slit Scanner Repeatability of the scanner is measured for 4 short scans around the center of the slit scan range. Measured positions agree within ±1 arcsec, corresponding to ±0.075 arcsec on the Sun. Some of this error may arise from the measurement process.

  7. Optical Verification of Slit Scanner In Completed FPP Map of reticle image: test central range of slit scanner

  8. Optical Verification of Slit Scanner In Completed FPP Deviation of measured reticle line from a linear fit: black = steep slope line red = shallow slope line

  9. Slit Scanner Performance • Large-scale sinusoidal variations in the slit scan step size: ~1.2 arcsec deviation from linear over 400 steps (60 arcsec) • Short scans: positions are repeatable within about 0.15 arcsec peak (0.025 arcsec rms) • No adjacent steps deviate by more than 1 step

  10. Slit Scan Vignetting Scan Mirror Step Number Scan Mirror Step Number 19 August 2004 NAOJ SP intensity vs. scan mirror position before pre-slit repair. FPP on OBU with solar feed. 26 May 2005 NAOJ SP intensity vs. scan mirror position after pre-slit repair. FPP on optical bench. Solar feed with telescope simulator.

  11. FPP-SP Spectral Resolution • Spectral resolution was monitored by measurement of the spectrum from the tunable laser • Rotating diffuser in beam to reduce laser speckle • Short integrations to minimize the effects of drift of the laser wavelength • Image at right shows sample laser measurement in both polarization images • Tuning the laser wavelength allows measurement of spectral response over the entire image plane

  12. FPP-SP Spectral Resolution • Fitted Laser Line Width Along Slit – Periodic Width Variation: • Spectrum is undersampled (instrumental width is~25mÅ, sampling is 21.3mÅ) • Spectrum curvature samples the profile along the slit at differing shifts relative to the peak of the emission line • Gaussian fitting procedure has some sensitivity to phase of undersampled points relative to the emission line center

  13. FPP-SP Spectral Resolution • Measured Variation of Spectral Resolution along Slit Length and Within Spectral Field of Each CCDSIDE: • Post-vibration data, 8 February 2006 • Average spectral width in 100-pixel bins along slit • No significant variations either along the slit, or as a function of wavelength • All widths considerably smaller than 35mÅ requirement

  14. FPP-SP Spectral Resolution Use the Spectrum Curvature to Advantage: • Assume small variation of the spectral resolution profile along the length of the slit • Normalize each spectral profile • Shift each profile to a common line center position (shift from fitting procedure) • Arrive at an instrumental resolution profile highly sampled in wavelength • Red wing asymmetry a feature of the spectrograph design

  15. FPP-SP Polarization S/N • FPP-SP flux levels measured during Sun tests • Measurements of transmission of heliostat and window • Solar radiance measurements simultaneously during Sun tests • Radiance measurements calibrated to zero airmass • These measurements and extrapolations allow one to extrapolate to the on-orbit S/N in polarimetric measurements • Inputs: • Dark-corrected continuum intensity in raw measurement units (DN) • Measured SP CCD scale factor: 100 e-/DN • Read Noise: 110 e- • Heliostat transmission at 630 nm: 0.51 • Atmospheric transmission at time of measurements: 0.58 • Sum two sides of CCD • Polarization modulation efficiency: 0.5 • Anticipated S/N, Typical 4.8 sec Integration: • Continuum, Quiet Sun: 1100 • Line center, Quiet Sun: 580 • Line center, Umbra: 164

  16. Scattered/Stray Light in the FPP-SP • Measurements made of scattering inside the spectrograph by means of a mask placed over the slit. • Intensity as a function of distance from the mask edge shows: • Maximum intensity adjacent to the mask edge is 0.017 of the illuminated intensity • Scattering falls below the required 10-2 level at a distance of 60 pixels (10 arcsec) from the edge

  17. FPP-SP Polarization Calibration • Calibration of entire SOT-FPP-SP optical system during Sun tests, June 2005 • Linear, right-, and left-circular polarizers over entrance of OTA • Observations: • Clear (no polarizer) • Linear, right-, left-circular polarizers • Four rotation stations of each: 0º, 45º, 90º, 135º • Standard mode observations (4.8s integrations) • Two spectral ROIs covering entire spectral range • Nine such data sets covering entire slit scan range

  18. FPP-SP Polarization Calibration • Data Analysis • Bin data spatially along slit (16x) and spectrally (2x) to reduce data volume and increase S/N • Normalize each Stokes vector observation to the measured Stokes I • Each binned pixel for each CCDSIDE was subjected to a non-linear least-squares fitting procedure to determine: • 15 polarization response matrix elements ([0,0] element –I→I crosstalk – set to unity) • Mount offset error of angular orientation for right- and for left-circular polarizers

  19. FPP-SP Polarization Calibration Polarization Accuracy Requirement and Measured Polarization Response Matrix: 1.00000 0.21996 0.01587 0.00437 -0.00033 0.48083 0.07739 -0.00125 -0.00072 0.06002 -0.47494 -0.00561 -0.00028 0.00437 -0.00792 0.52939 Typical system response matrix for CCDSIDE0, for the left ROI (without strong spectral lines). Off-diagonal values highlighted in red exceed those of the polarization accuracy matrix. Polarization Accuracy Matrix Requirement • It is almost the case that no polarization calibration is necessary: response matrix is nearly diagonal, within the required accuracy! • Calibration should improve the polarization precision by at least an order of magnitude better than the requirement

  20. FPP-SP Polarization Calibration Features of the polarization response matrix: 1.00000 0.21996 0.01587 0.00437 -0.00033 0.48083 0.07739 -0.00125 -0.00072 0.06002 -0.47494 -0.00561 -0.00028 0.00437 -0.00792 0.52939 Typical system response matrix for CCDSIDE0, for the left ROI (without strong spectral lines). Off-diagonal values highlighted in red exceed those of the polarization accuracy matrix. Polarization Accuracy Matrix Requirement • The off-diagonal QU and UQ elements (in red) represent a simple rotation of coordinate system, in this case by only about 2.5º. • The second element of the first row shows the large value of QI crosstalk typical of a single-beam polarimeter. When the two CCDSIDEs are combined, this response is largely cancelled. • Diagonal elements are close to their anticipated values. • Intensity to polarization crosstalk (first column of the matrix) is very small.

  21. FPP-SP Polarization Calibration Spatial/Spectral Variation of the Measured Polarization Response Matrix: ROI 112-224 ROI 0-112 • Variations of the matrix across the field are smaller than the uncertainties, except for first column (I→Q,U,V, easily calibrated on orbit) • Residual smoothed variations are on the order of ~few x 10-4 of the continuum intensity ----- 0.00040 0.00053 0.00037 0.00432 0.00308 0.00115 0.00077 0.00173 0.00139 0.00289 0.00130 0.00203 0.00045 0.00035 0.00166 RMS fluctuations of the response matrix for ROI 0-112, CCDSIDE0

  22. FPP Spectro-Polarimeter Performance SUMMARY: • The FPP-SP meets (and exceeds) its performance requirements • Polarization calibration will be carried out as a function of wavelength, dimension along the slit, and slit scan position to account for small variations • The spectral response function, highly sampled in wavelength, will be used in the inversion process • Signal/Noise is higher than anticipated because of excess read noise in the cameras. Nonetheless, the goal of 1000:1 in the continuum per spectral/spatial pixel is achieved

More Related