180 likes | 341 Views
Kentucky System of Interventions Student Intervention Plans. Student Intervention Team. Purpose Team Members Function of Team. Be Data-Driven!. Home life Behavior Previous academic performance Identifiers Gifted & Talented Special Education English Language Learner
E N D
Student Intervention Team • Purpose • Team Members • Function of Team
Be Data-Driven! • Home life • Behavior • Previous academic performance • Identifiers • Gifted & Talented • Special Education • English Language Learner • Race, gender, or ethnicity • Previous school attended
Student Planning • Evaluate the universal screener and/or diagnostic assessment data for each student • Generate a list of the skills/concepts that the student has not mastered • Consider and possibly remove tier 1 issues
Individual Math Student • Number/Computation: Proficient (3/6) • Rate/Ratio/Proportion • Algebraic Thinking: Novice (3/11) • Solve equations/inequalities • Changing parameters of graphs • Polynomial expressions • Identify functions • Simple algebraic expressions • 2 Var. Equations/Inequalities • Properties/Evaluating Functions
Probability/Statistics: Apprentice (2/5) • Probability • Sampling techniques • Curve fitting • Geometry/Measurement: Novice (3/10) • Right triangle • Properties of triangles • Congruence/similarity • Dimensions/relationships - Spatial relationships • Transformations
Data Analysis Activity • Prioritize the areas of weakness • Algebraic Thinking • Identifying function families • Graphing a function based on the equation • Geometry/Measurement • Properties of triangles • Probability/Statistics • Sampling techniques • Curve fitting
Based on the data, what skills/concepts do you want the student to achieve during the intervention sessions? • Consider the distance between where the student is currently performing and the goal (gap to goal) • Consider and possibly remove tier 1 issues • Consider multiple increments • Based on that information, what would be a reasonable timeframe for this child to achieve the skills/concepts? • Note: instructional sessions
4 Characteristics of a well-written Goal • Meaningful • Measureable • Able to be Monitored • Useful in Making instructional decisions
SMART Goals • Specific • Measurable • Achievable • Realistic • Time Framed
Goal vs. Objective • Long –term goal: system for measuring the student’s progress toward long-range expectations • Short-term objective: logical breakdown of the major components of the long-term goal and they measure progress toward meeting the long-term goal
Progress Monitoring • Long-term goals and short-term objectives should be monitored frequently and repeatedly • Develop a progress monitoring timeline • Provide Descriptive Feedback to the student • Template provided
Resources • Kentucky System of Interventions (KSI) http://www.education.ky.gov/KDE/Instructional+Resources/Kentucky+System+of+Interventions/ • Academic & Behavioral Response to Intervention (ABRI) http://louisville.edu/education/srp/abri • National RtI Center http://www.rti4success.org/ • Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline (KYCID) http://www.kycid.org/
IRIS Center http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/ • Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching & Learning (CHETL) http://www.education.ky.gov/KDE/Instructional+Resources/Highly+Effective+Teaching+and+Learning/HETL+Common+Characteristics.tm • What Works Clearinghouse http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
Johnston, P. H. (2010). RTI in literacy responsive and comprehensive. International Reading Association. • Allington, R. L. (2008). What really matters in response to intervention: research-based designs. Pearson. • Quinn, P. (2010). Ultimate RTI. Charleston: Total RTI.
Questions? 502-564-2106 Kim Willhoite, Reading Interventionist Kim.willhoite@education.ky.gov Samantha Thomas, Math Interventionist Samantha.thomas@education.ky.gov April Pieper, Academic Program Manager April.pieper@education.ky.gov