100 likes | 230 Views
SOPs for projects evaluation and management 2005. Zug, January 2005. Contents. Project categories Evaluation objectives Project Management Process Project Application format Project evaluation criteria. The Foundation engages in 3 categories of projects:.
E N D
SOPs for projects evaluation and management 2005 Zug, January 2005
Contents • Project categories • Evaluation objectives • Project Management Process • Project Application format • Project evaluation criteria
The Foundation engages in 3 categories of projects: • Public Call Research Projects (PCRP) • Foundation communication projects, e.g Wyeth Forum • Wyeth projects
Project evaluation objectives • Implement projects which are in line with Foundation vision, objectives within the given strategic frames • Provide the information basis for project priority setting (Board) • Provide basis to assure adequate resource allocation from a Foundation point of view (Board) • Provide basis for additional external resource acquisition (co-funding, project-partnerships)
General project evaluation & management process Partner Agreements Monitoring Scientific Commission Evaluation Board Approval Implemen- tation Foundation Office • Short-Listing • Project evaluation (detailed) with external experts Projects Submission
Types of research projects Research & Education projects • Studies/Analysis • Clinical • Public health • Epidemiologic • Health-economics • Prevention • Education • Medical profession • Patients Communication projects • Scientific/Public events • Advocacy projects
Application deadline 30 May Public Call Research Project Procedure(PCRP) 2005 Decision Project Funding Decision Project Short List Preliminary Evaluation Public Call Project Evaluation Project Start 1 October Scientific Committee Scientific Committee Board November Forum Pre-application deadline 15 March 30 April Evaluation finalised 30 June
Initiative/Project Application formate 1. What: Short description of initiative 2. Why: Medical or public rationale for project 3. Benefits: What are the benefits to whom 4. Consequences: Costs, required resources 5. Success measures: Parameters to measure success 6. Potential partnerships: 3rd parties for collaborative work 7. Additional 7.1 How methods and materials 7.2 Project timeline, cost estimate and milestones 7.3 CVs of applicants 7.4 Potential conflict of interests 7.5 Long-term consequences
Project pre-evaluation criteria Low High 1 2 3 • Within scope of foundation • Degree of innovation • Benefits to the patient • Added value to the society • Scientific and medical relevance • 3rd party collaborative interest • Estimated public health cost-benefit ratio • Adequacy of resources needed Max: 24 Points
Categorization of evaluated projects A: Chance of success: high ( 3 points) B: Chance of success: medium (2 points) C: Chance of success: low (1 point) D: Discarded (0 points)