250 likes | 802 Views
ACTIVITY BASED LEARNING Tamil Nadu. Amukta Mahapatra Director SchoolScape, Centre for Educators. Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. Education for All Movement In line with MDGs & other international & national commitments CRC, Constitution of India, RtE A central-state programme.
E N D
ACTIVITY BASED LEARNING Tamil Nadu Amukta MahapatraDirector SchoolScape, Centre for Educators
Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan • Education for All Movement • In line with MDGs & other international & national commitments • CRC, Constitution of India, RtE • A central-state programme
Indirect Preparation • NEP: 1986 Mass Training of Teachers • DPEP: 1994 – 2001 Textbooks Reworked • Joyful Learning: 1995 – 2000 Teacher Active • Professional Development of the Teacher Educator (DIET Faculty Training): 2001- 2003Participatory & ConstructiveApproach • Visit to Rishi Valley satellite schools
ABL Incubation in Chennai Corporation 2003: 10 + 3 schools with photocopied materials for Classes 1 & 2 to 2006: 265 schools for Classes 1 to 4 almost 50,000 children with printed and 3 D material reaching the most disadvantaged communities of Chennai
Scaled Across StateJune 2007 Reaching approx:37,500 schools 1.2 lakh teachers 50 lakh children • Support by Chennai Corporation teachers and BRTs • Classes 1 to 4 with printed TLM; 3D materials given in phases • Baseline Survey 84% of children are with the government schools in the state
ABL Addresses Issues of: • Children not Learning • Teachers not Teaching • Dominant Role of the Teacher • Multi-levels of Learning • Lack of on-site support for teacher • Absenteeism of Children
ABL Base Year SurveysJune 2007 and April 2008 Classes II and IV • Review of classroom processes & learning environment available to the child • Assessment in Tamil, Maths and English • Reading skills in Tamil for Class II & both Tamil & English for Class IV
Tools Administered • School profile format (Format A) • Schedule for classroom observers (Format B) • Questionnaire for teachers to write in (Format C) • Child Interview schedule (Format D) • Achievement test papers for Class II & IV in Tamil, Mathematics, English • Reading test sheets for Class II in Tamil; Tamil and English for Class IV
Key Findings2008 Average AchievementClass IIClass IV Tamil 61.63% 63.19% Mathematics 74.45% 63.01% English 70.62% 52.33% The figures revealed that as compared to the baseline study there was an increase of nearly 25% to 29% in all three subjects in both the classes.
Key Findings Gaps in achievement narrowed down: within gender, location and social groups Baseline: significant difference in achievement boys and girls urban and rural children and children from different social communities 2008: in Tamil achievement nosignificant difference found between rural and urban children and among the children of different social groups; in English achievement, no significant difference between rural and urban and among boys and girls.
Achievementby Gender, Location and Community - Class IV • Mean achievement of children improved significantly in all groups and in all subjects • Maximum improvement observed among SC/ST and MBC children in all three subjects
Quality of Achievement during Baseline & End term– Class II • Percentage of basic (low) achievers children reduced by 34% to 40% in all subjects • Percentage of children who scored very high and excellent increased during end term in all three subjects
Summary • Average achievement of children in both the classes and all subjects increased significantly • Gaps in achievement within gender, area and social groups narrowed down • More children shifted from low achievement range to very high and excellent achievement range • Inter and intra district variations reduced in both the classes • Number of children who could read Tamil and English fluently increased substantially in both the classes
Classroom Environment Baseline2008 • Children sitting in rows 78% 5.47% • Children sitting in a circle 21% 81%
Teaching and Learning materials Baseline2008 • Supplementary reading materials other than textbooks40%80% • Materials found to be challenging 3%80%
Understanding Lessons Baseline2008 • Children’s understanding of the lesson being taught was “high”32% 89% • Teachers gave explanations with examples30% 50% In addition, it was observed in 2008 that 97% of teachers provided an informative introduction to the lesson
Child Participation Baseline Findings • Students were rarely or never observed asking the teacher a question in almost half of the classrooms • Teachers frequently silenced the children - 66% of the classrooms 2008 Findings • Teachers asked relevant questions - 54% • Children were encouraged to ask questions - 48% • Teachers encouraged children to volunteer answers to questions - 49% • Slower learners encouraged - 57%
Lessons for Education Community • No branding by individuals or organisation but a seepage of ideas • Involvement & participation of people from teacher to minister • Fundamental change, not incremental • Stage by stage growth with direction • Continuous review • Mix of centralization & ground-up
Presented by Amukta Mahapatra schoolscape@yahoo.com Ref: http:www.ssa.tn.nic.in 2009 “Feet on the ground, eyes on the horizon, and with heart in the sky”