1 / 56

In-Flight Fatigue Crack Monitoring in Aircraft Using Acoustic Emission and Neural Networks

In-Flight Fatigue Crack Monitoring in Aircraft Using Acoustic Emission and Neural Networks. Eric. v. K. Hill Samuel G. Vaughn Christopher L. Rovik. Fatigue Crack Monitoring. Background Test Setup & Procedure Acoustic Emission Neural Networks Results Conclusions & Recommendations.

beck
Download Presentation

In-Flight Fatigue Crack Monitoring in Aircraft Using Acoustic Emission and Neural Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. In-Flight Fatigue Crack Monitoring in AircraftUsing Acoustic Emission and Neural Networks Eric. v. K. Hill Samuel G. Vaughn Christopher L. Rovik

  2. Fatigue Crack Monitoring • Background • Test Setup & Procedure • Acoustic Emission • Neural Networks • Results • Conclusions & Recommendations

  3. Background

  4. Fatigue Cracking • Brittle failure in a normally ductile material due to cyclic loads below yield stress • Plastic deformation plus cyclic loads leads to strain hardening, then fatigue cracking • Small cyclic loads can cause significant damage over time

  5. Notable Fatigue Failures • 1988 Aloha Airlines flight: a piece of a B-737 fuselage tore off during flight due to corrosion/fatigue cracking • Recent F-15E fuselage longeron failure behind cockpit – grounding of fleet • Aging aircraft are progressively accumulating fatigue damage • This leads to costly mandatory inspections and parts replacement at “safe” intervals

  6. In-Flight Acoustic Emission Applications • Military: KC-135, C-5A, F-105 • Commercial: N/A • Civil: Piper PA-28 Cadet & Cessna T-303 Crusader Goal:In-flight fatigue crack detection systems promote maintenance schemes based on replacement for cause rather than replacement at conservatively calculated intervals using linear elastic fracture mechanics.

  7. Relevant M.S. Theses • 1994 A.F. de Almeida: Neural Network Detection of Fatigue Crack Growth in Riveted Joints Using Acoustic Emission • 1995 W.P. Thornton: Classification of Acoustic Emission Signals from an Aluminum Pressure Vessel Using a Self-Organizing Map • 1996 M.L. Marsden: Detection of Fatigue Crack Growth in a Simulated Aircraft Fuselage • 1998 S.G. Vaughn III: In-Flight Fatigue Crack Monitoring of an Aircraft Engine Cowling • 1998 C.L. Rovik: Classification of In-Flight Fatigue Cracks in Aircraft Structures Using Acoustic Emission and Neural Networks

  8. Test Setup & Procedure

  9. Testbed 1: Engine Cowling

  10. In-Flight Test Set-Up

  11. In-Flight Test Set-Up • 4 acoustic emission transducers symmetrically mounted on engine cowling • 2 transducers monitoring crack growth and the other 2 recording the noise • 3 Flights with 5 particular maneuvers monitored on each flight

  12. Testbed 2: Vertical Tail Cessna Crusader N106ER

  13. Equipment Setup (Flight)

  14. Equipment Setup (Lab)

  15. Acoustic Emission

  16. Acoustic Emission (AE) • Definition: • The transient elastic waves generated by the rapid release of energy within a material due to flaw growth mechanisms

  17. AE Signal (Voltage vs. Time) Waveform Parameters

  18. AE Sources & Characteristics • Fatigue Cracking • Plastic Deformation • Mechanical Noise (Rubbing & Rivet Fretting)

  19. AE Duration vs. Amplitude Plot

  20. Source Location

  21. Source Location Plot

  22. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Analysis

  23. Data Acquisition • AE source (e.g., fatigue crack) emits acoustic emission energy in the form of stress waves • Piezoelectric crystal within AE transducer senses the signal • AE signal amplified and transmitted to a computer where its waveform quantification parameters are digitized and stored • Records signals in the frequency range 100 kHz to 1 MHz

  24. Neural Networks

  25. Classification Neural Network • Kohonen Self-Organizing Map (SOM) neural network uses mathematical processes to classify “things” based on a set of inputs: six AE quantification parameters (amplitude, duration, counts, energy, rise time, and counts-to-peak)

  26. SOM Neural Network Architecture

  27. SOM Data Processing • Two primary steps in implementing a Kohonen SOM neural network: • Training the SOM – sample of data • Testing the SOM – remainder of data

  28. Training the SOM • Create a training file • 5 steps to training: • 1. Randomly set weights between 0 and 1 • 2. Introduce first input vector ( 6 signal parameters for AE hit) • 3. Find minimal planar distance between the input vector and Kohonen neurons • 4. Identify the neuron with the minimal distance • 5. Adjust/update the weights

  29. Testing the SOM • Create testing file • Pass test file through the trained neural network and it will be classified

  30. Results

  31. Anticipated Results • Neural network classifies lab test data into 3 categories: fatigue cracking, plastic deformation, and rubbing (mechanical noise) • Trained neural network classifies the entire lab test file with a high degree of accuracy • In-flight data verifies fatigue crack growth between Channels 1 & 2 on Piper Cadet cowling • Fatigue crack growth activity associated with stressful maneuvers on Cessna Crusader vertical tail

  32. Lab Test Configuration

  33. Lab Test Results • Over twenty AE files were recorded during the lab fatigue tests • File twenty: 3 minutes 30 seconds in length; recorded fatigue cracking for the last minute • Duration vs. Amplitude plot of file twenty shows good separation between failure mechanisms

  34. Duration vs. Amplitude (File 20)

  35. ATPOST Filtering Limits • AE sources filtered into individual files:

  36. Training the SOM • 100 hits each of fatigue cracking, plastic deformation, and rubbing for a total of 300 hits were used for training • Trained neural network tested 99% accurate when testing the remaining 70,000+ hits • One column by three row (1x3) matrix Kohonen classification layer gave the most concise output

  37. Piper PA-28 Cadet Engine Cowling Results

  38. In-Flight Test Set-Up

  39. Piper Cadet In-Flight Data SOM Output (Channels 1&2)

  40. Fatigue Crack (Channels 1&2)

  41. Piper Cadet In-Flight Data SOM Output (Channels 3&4)

  42. Fatigue Crack (Channels 3&4)

  43. Output Observations • Fatigue crack growth unexpectedly detected on both sides of the aircraft cowling • Inspection revealed cracking between Channels 3 - 4 as well as 1 - 2 • Cracking in the engine cowling occurred predominantly during ground operations: taxi, take-off, and final approach/landing

  44. Cessna T-303 Crusader Vertical Tail Results

  45. Equipment Setup (Flight)

  46. Cessna Crusader In-Flight Data SOM Output

  47. Conclusions & Recommendations

  48. Conclusions • SOM trained successfully to classify fatigue cracking, plastic deformation, and rubbing noises • Fatigue crack growth successfully detected in-flight from both engine cowling of the Piper PA-28 Cadet and vertical tail of the Cessna T-303 Crusader using AE parameter data • Engine cowling fatigue cracking occurred mostly during ground-based operations while vertical tail fatigue cracking occurred predominantly in-flight, especially during rolls and Dutch rolls • In-flight crack detection systems should help to minimize maintenance costs and extend the service lives of aging aircraft.

More Related