260 likes | 416 Views
Marc Smeed Edmund Tsang Graham Dow. 16469- Low Energy Building Design Presentation 3- Demand/Supply Matching. DEMAND REDUCTION. START CIBSE ‘TYPICAL PRACTICE PRIMARY SCHOOL’. AIR TIGHT CONSTRUCTION. Assumptions Heating Period External Temp = 8.6 ° C 1 Design Internal Temp = 21 ° C.
E N D
Marc Smeed Edmund Tsang Graham Dow 16469- Low Energy Building DesignPresentation 3- Demand/Supply Matching
DEMAND REDUCTION STARTCIBSE ‘TYPICAL PRACTICE PRIMARY SCHOOL’
AIR TIGHT CONSTRUCTION • Assumptions • Heating Period External Temp = 8.6°C1 • Design Internal Temp = 21°C Calculated Heat Loss, per m2 per hour = 4.04W/m2h Calculated Heat Loss, per m2 per hour = 1.61W/m2h Saving = (4.04-1.61)/4.04 * 100% =60% Energy Saving = 27.2 kWh/m2 p.a. 1. ESP-r data output: (Average external temp for heating season)
DEMAND REDUCTION CIBSE ‘TYPICAL PRACTICE PRIMARY SCHOOL’
HEAT RECOVERY • Assumptions • External Temp = 8.6°C1 • Design Internal Temp = 21°C • Exchanger εs = 65%2 • Occupied days per year = 1903 • Occupied hours per day = 8 • Ceiling Height = 3m • Total Building Ventilation Rate = 1.5 ACH qs = εs*mmin*Cp*(∆T) = 65%*(0.00125*1.284)*1.014*11 = 0.0116kW/m2 Heat flow rate through sensible heat exchanger4 Occupied hours in the year = 1520 Heat Recovered = 17.7 kWh/m2 p.a. 1. ESP-r data output: (Average external temp for occupied hours) 2. CIBSE Guide F: Table 4.6,p.4-13 3. www.cumbria.gov.uk 4. ASHRAE Handbook 2004: Chapter 44
DEMAND REDUCTION CIBSE ‘TYPICAL PRACTICE PRIMARY SCHOOL’
DEMAND REDUCTION CIBSE ‘TYPICAL PRACTICE PRIMARY SCHOOL’
FOSSIL FUELS 79% LIGHTING CONTROL • Assumptions ELECTRICITY 21% 1.
LIGHTING CONTROL • Assumptions LIGHTING = 10/21 % OF ELECTRICAL LOAD = 47% = 15.2kWh/m2p.a. 1.
LIGHTING CONTROL Occupancy sensors can reduce lighting load by 30-40%1 This can rise to 75% if integrate with PSALI1 Therefore we can assume that we could obtain at least 35% reduction. 35% X 15.2kWh/m2 = 5.33kWh/m2 Energy Saving= 5.33 kWh/m2 p.a. 1. www.advancebuildings.org
DEMAND REDUCTION CIBSE ‘TYPICAL PRACTICE PRIMARY SCHOOL’
FLYWHEEL • A rotor is accelerated, maintaining the energy in the system as inertial energy • Maximum Power rating of 2000KW for a multi-cabinet type • Maximum Power rating of 500KW for a single-cabinet type • Stored energy discharges at a maximum time of 2 minutes
FLYWHEEL- FEASIBILTY • ADVANTAGES • Flexible • Commercially available • High power outputs • DISADVANTAGES • Safety concerns • Short discharge times • Expensive
HYDROGEN STORAGE • The 3 key elements are • Electrolysis Mechanism • Hydrogen Storage • Fuel Cell • Hydrogen stored via • Pressurised storage • Ammonia • Metal hydrides
FEASIBILITY • High storage capacity- around 165 KWh /m3 • Only pressurised hydrogen storage is currently available for building use • Other storage only commercially available for vehicles • Expensive
THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE TWO TYPES • Sensible • A Tank underground, used for heat storage (25kWh/m^3) • Latent • Higher energy density (around 100kWh/m^3) • Phase change materials (PCM) used where it solidifies during night then melts during the day
Purpose of Demand Shifting • Demand shifting makes use of storage so that peaks and troughs of demand are levelled off • Requires intelligent forward thinking • Can be remotely managed system and use predictions to help shift loads
What's to be gained • Throttling a CHP system is not required • Constant power generation can be attained, decrease maintenance problems • Can help incorporate renewable systems
DEMAND SHIFTING FOR RENEWABLES • Demand shifting can be used to create demand when it suits a renewable supply. • For Example- Solar works when there are higher levels of solar intensity- i.e. in the summer/midday.
VISION What is going to be different about our School? • A ‘HYDROGEN’ school • A DECOUPLED school A NEW approach to school design