1 / 27

ANALYSIS OF DISE 2006-07 FOR ASSESSMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE GAPS

ANALYSIS OF DISE 2006-07 FOR ASSESSMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE GAPS. Analysis of DISE have already been done for DISE data 2004-05 and 2005-06. In 2006-07 analysis have been completed for 613 districts of the Country after computing target of 2006-07,2007-08 & 2008-09.

becky
Download Presentation

ANALYSIS OF DISE 2006-07 FOR ASSESSMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE GAPS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ANALYSIS OF DISE 2006-07 FOR ASSESSMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE GAPS

  2. Analysis of DISE have already been done for DISE data 2004-05 and 2005-06. • In 2006-07 analysis have been completed for 613 districts of the Country after computing target of 2006-07,2007-08 & 2008-09. • Analysis for 2006-07 has been done for various parameters so as to arrive at definite gaps, time taken and to find out ways and means to complete the gaps with in project period. • To target those districts first where special efforts are needed to complete the gaps as per DISE 2006-07 • The total gaps worked out are 601666 classrooms.

  3. The States having large gaps as per analysis are as under. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra and Uttrakhand are likely to complete the gaps with in project period. We have to concentrate on balance 6 states and these are Assam, Bihar, Chattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh.

  4. Further analysis shows that there are 415 districts with less than 1000 classrooms gaps, 101 districts between 1000-2000, 49 districts between 2000-3000 gap and 48 districts with more than 3000 gaps. • Major concern is for 48 & 49 districts where the State may plan maximum classrooms in the next AWP&B. The States will have to built the capacity for taking up large number of classrooms in these districts. • The districts having more than 3000 classrooms have been termed SFD where the allocation can be planned up to 50% of the budget allocation. • In addition, the districts having PS to UPS ratio more than 2.5 : 1 may also be termed SFD.

  5. STATE WISE ABSTRACT OF ASSESSMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS BASED ON SCHOOL WISE ANALYSIS AS PER DISE 2006-07 INCLUDING TARGET 2008-09 A

  6. Colored States shown as more than 2000-3000

  7. Colored States shown as more than 3000

  8. TIME REQUIRED FOR COMPLETION OF GAPS • In order to work out time period, district wise gaps were taken and achievements from district plan of 2006-07, 2007-08 were compiled and time period was worked out. • The data have revealed that there are 19 districts which will take more than 10 years to complete the gaps (Chattisgarh & Gujarat not taken). • The Number of these districts state wise are as under. These districts need special monitoring at all levels.

  9. Note: the district wise is attached for ready reference.

  10. B

  11. C SUMMARY TABLE OF DISTRICT WISE GAPS & NUMBER OF YEAR FOR COMPLETION

  12. Analysis reveal that major chunk of district will complete the infrastructure gaps within 2 years or 2-3 years. The details are: Note:--Gujarat and chhatisgarh not included

  13. STATES HAVING MAJOR GAPS BETWEEN 2000-3000 AND MORE THAN 3000 Colored districts showing more than 2000-3000 ACR Number of Districts = 3

  14. Colored districts showing more than 2000-300 ACR Number of districts = 7

  15. Colored (pink) districts showing more than 2000-3000 ACR and colored (Yellow) more than 3000 Number of districts for 2000-3000 = 7 Number of districts for more than 3000 = 24

  16. Colored (Pink) districts showing more than 2000 ACR and Colored (yellow) 3000 ACR Number of districts for 2000-3000 = 2 Number of districts for more than 3000 = 4

  17. Colored districts showing 2000-3000 ACR Number of districts = 3

  18. Colored ( yellow) districts showing more than 3000 ACR and Colored (pink) 2000 ACR Number of districts for 2000-3000 = 7 Number of districts for more than 3000 = 5

  19. Colored districts showing more than 3000 ACR and Colored 2000 ACR Number of districts for 2000-3000 = 11 Number of districts for more than 3000 = 5

  20. Colored (yellow) districts showing more than 3000 ACR and Colored ( Orange) 2000 Number of districts for 2000-3000 = 1 Number of districts for more than 3000 = 2

  21. Colored (Magenta) districts showing more than 3000 ACR and Colored (Yellow) 2000 ACR Number of districts for 2000-3000 = 8 Number of districts for more than 3000 = 6

  22. Colored districts showing more than 3000 ACR Number of districts for more than 3000 = 1

  23. Saturation of Gaps • Analysis has revealed that 6 states are showing minus gaps, namely Himachal Pradesh,Kerala,Manipur,Sikkim,Dadar Nagar Haveli, Lakshadweep. In fact these States have completed the infrastructure gaps. Similarly 161 districts also reveal minus gaps, there by these districts have saturated the gaps. The details are as under: the total minus gaps works out to be (minus) 46834 classrooms

  24. D STATES AND DISTRICTS, SATURATED THE CLASSROOMS GAPS ( DISE 2006-07)

  25. CONCLUSION • Overall gaps of classrooms works out to 601666, after computing targets of 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09 • District with more than 3000 gaps are 48 and between to 2000-3000 gaps are 49. • With the present level of achievement 19 district will take more than 10 years, 77 district including 19 will take more than 4 years, 46 will take 3-4 years, 76 between 2-3 years and 392 less than 2 years.(Gujrat and Chhatigarh not included) • Analysis have shown that some of the districts although do not have large gaps but the targets for classrooms is not being fixed proportionate. These districts may be looked into and appropriate targets are proposed.

  26. 6 states and 161 districts have completed gaps. These district have minus gaps of 46834 classrooms. • States with large gaps will have to compile perspective plan for 2/ 3 years and AWP&B 2009-10 will be part of it. • States with large gaps, will have to built up capacity at block, district and State level to complete the gaps

  27. Thanks

More Related