1 / 8

Community involvement in scaling up TB/HIV activities

Community involvement in scaling up TB/HIV activities. Achievements. Cambodia “TB volunteers” – community-based NGO volunteers involved in decentralized DOT for 50% of country; now also involved in TB/HIV Link TB clients to HIV testing Screen PLHIV for TB

beckyperez
Download Presentation

Community involvement in scaling up TB/HIV activities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Community involvement in scaling up TB/HIV activities

  2. Achievements • Cambodia “TB volunteers” – community-based NGO volunteers involved in decentralized DOT for 50% of country; now also involved in TB/HIV • Link TB clients to HIV testing • Screen PLHIV for TB • Impact: Improved HIV testing of TB patients • India & Bangladesh – PLHIV networks involved in ICF and communication • Educate PLHA on TB • Perform ICF in a variety of settings • Support referrals

  3. Achievements continue • Vietnam – NGO home-based care for HIV includes family education/sensitization on TB and linkage to TB services. • India – involvement of Targeted Intervention NGOs in TBHIV services for High-Risk Groups (CSW, IDU, MSM) • Services: ICF, referral of TB suspects, DOTS • Other successful examples cited • Zambia: Community members staff “TB desks” in HIV clinics, and “HIV desks” in TB clinics • South Africa: TAC involved in advocacy, e.g. TB diagnostics

  4. Constraints & challenges • Culture clash – historical medical approach to TB control lacked major role for community • Not used to partnerships with civil society, client community • Underlying lack of patient empowerment • Resources few (No demand/ no supply) • Donor driven – and they are not steering in this direction • Evaluation frameworks favor medical interventions over HR and meeting-intensive community involvement • Missing clear standardized M&E framework for monitoring ACSM activities & quantifying impact for performance-based funding mechanisms • Community with limited access to high-level discussions

  5. Constraints & challenges • Literacy around TB limited • TB as preventable, rather than inevitable • TB IC as patients / health care worker safety • Effect of stigma • Limited capacity • National: technical support for planning, developing partnerships and proposals • Sub-national: limited capacity for multi-lateral initiatives & partnerships with local organizations • Community: NGO/CBO/PLHIV network has limited capacity to expand activities and campaigns; very limited networks of TB survivors • Community networks (local lay health workers – e.g. ASHA, village health worker) often not utilized for either disease

  6. Opportunities • Leverage extensive HIV community involvement for TB • Grow community involvement for TB and use this to also support TB/HIV activities

  7. Way forward • NTP, NAP and partners • Promote clients empowerment (NTP)(eg Clients charter) • Sensitize of lay workers, PLHIV groups, HRG groups, labor/workplace community groups. • Promote treatment/TB-HIV literacy among community • Include TB in NGO/CBO activities for most-affected populations • Document and disseminate successes • Engage untapped networks of lay health workers for both diseases

  8. Way forward • Technical partners • Support capacity NTP/NAP – programs to engage civil society (sub-national) • Develop national consultants to support planning and partnerships • Advocating with donors to support community involvement • Develop M&E framework for community involvement that donors agree on • Develop evidence on risk of TB, infection control to community • PLHIV groups • Promote treatment/TB-HIV literacy • Include TB in all advocacy agenda.

More Related