320 likes | 717 Views
Groups. Henry Ford Ford Motor Company's assembly lineCan groups outperform individuals?What does the story of Ford's success with the assembly line exemplify about the social psychology of groups?. What Groups Are. Groups are two or more people doing or being something together Groups feel simi
E N D
1. Chapter 14 - Groups What Groups Are and Do
Groups, Roles, and Selves
Group Action
How Groups Think
Power and Leadership
This is an overview of the topics of the chapter. Before beginning the chapter there is a slide based on the chapter introduction that can be used to stimulate classroom discussion.
Supplemental Lecture: See Roy Baumeister’s own PowerPoint© lecture on Groups under the “supplemental lecture” menu on your Multimedia Manager Instructor’s Resource CD, or visit the Book Companion Website for a downloadable file.This is an overview of the topics of the chapter. Before beginning the chapter there is a slide based on the chapter introduction that can be used to stimulate classroom discussion.
Supplemental Lecture: See Roy Baumeister’s own PowerPoint© lecture on Groups under the “supplemental lecture” menu on your Multimedia Manager Instructor’s Resource CD, or visit the Book Companion Website for a downloadable file.
2. Groups Henry Ford
Ford Motor Company’s assembly line
Can groups outperform individuals?
What does the story of Ford’s success with the assembly line exemplify about the social psychology of groups? Technology Tips: APA recently issued a press release detailing research that groups surpass individuals at problem solving.Technology Tips: APA recently issued a press release detailing research that groups surpass individuals at problem solving.
3. What Groups Are Groups are two or more people doing or being something together
Groups feel similar to one another
Presence of an outgroup Technology Tip: The film Flight 93 demonstrates how a diverse group can come together as a cohesive group in the face of a hijacking. (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0475276/)Technology Tip: The film Flight 93 demonstrates how a diverse group can come together as a cohesive group in the face of a hijacking. (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0475276/)
4. What Groups Do In human evolution
Safety in numbers
Help others find food
Accomplish tasks that are too difficult for the individual
5. What Groups Do Cultural groups
Preserve information and pass it along to future generations
Use information to organize themselves
Benefit from role differentiation and division of labor Teaching Tip: Consider holding your own jelly bean challenge akin to Surowiecki’s challenge described in the online article “The Wisdom of Crowds.”Teaching Tip: Consider holding your own jelly bean challenge akin to Surowiecki’s challenge described in the online article “The Wisdom of Crowds.”
6. Tradeoffs - Diversity in Groups Diversity involves tradeoffs
Can be more creative and flexible
Better chance of bringing in different information
Can be harder to cooperate and work together
7. Groups, Roles and Selves One main function of a group is to accomplish something.
Having unique roles help us work together
Roles are defined by the system; exist independent of the person in that role
People need to be flexible to take on and drop roles
8. Groups, Roles, and Selves Deindividuation vs. Differentiation
Is it best to be anonymous or openly identified?
Example
Voting – We keep our vote private to protect ourselves
Problems with Deindividuation
Aggression, Antisocial behavior
Individual beliefs become lost Teaching Tip: Ask students to consider whether they mind that their friends like to shop at the same clothing stores that they do. Likely few will mind; in fact, sharing similar tastes in clothes can be self-affirming. Next ask whether they would mind if their friends repeatedly bought the same outfits they had. Likely many would mind this, opening the door to explaining the optimal distinctiveness theory.Teaching Tip: Ask students to consider whether they mind that their friends like to shop at the same clothing stores that they do. Likely few will mind; in fact, sharing similar tastes in clothes can be self-affirming. Next ask whether they would mind if their friends repeatedly bought the same outfits they had. Likely many would mind this, opening the door to explaining the optimal distinctiveness theory.
9. Deindividuation and Mob Violence Deindividuation can lead to antisocial behavior
Being anonymous to outsiders makes people more willing to violate norms
Stop worrying about what others think of them – more willing to behave badly
Accountability is best predictor of aggression
Teaching Tip: A vivid example of deindividuation and mob violence came in 2000 when mobs of men attacked women and girls in Central Park. See “More Women, Girls Tell of Attacks by Mob of Men in New York” at CNN.com (http://archives.cnn.com/2000/US/06/14/central.park.assault.01/).Teaching Tip: A vivid example of deindividuation and mob violence came in 2000 when mobs of men attacked women and girls in Central Park. See “More Women, Girls Tell of Attacks by Mob of Men in New York” at CNN.com (http://archives.cnn.com/2000/US/06/14/central.park.assault.01/).
10. Groups, Roles, and Selves Optimal distinctiveness theory
Tension between the need to be similar to group members and distinctive from them
If we feel too similar, we try to become different. If we feel too different, we try to become similar.
Identifying people in groups and holding them accountable produces better results Teaching Tip: Ask students to consider whether they mind that their friends like to shop at the same clothing stores that they do. Likely few will mind; in fact, sharing similar tastes in clothes can be self-affirming. Next ask whether they would mind if their friends repeatedly bought the same outfits they had. Likely many would mind this, opening the door to explaining the optimal distinctiveness theory.Teaching Tip: Ask students to consider whether they mind that their friends like to shop at the same clothing stores that they do. Likely few will mind; in fact, sharing similar tastes in clothes can be self-affirming. Next ask whether they would mind if their friends repeatedly bought the same outfits they had. Likely many would mind this, opening the door to explaining the optimal distinctiveness theory.
11. Groups Action Theory of social facilitation (Zajonc, 1965)
Presence of others increases arousal
Arousal increases dominant response
Triplett’s study of cyclists
Presence of others can improve people’s performance, especially familiar, easy tasks Technology Tip: To demonstrate this effect, students can type part of a paper alone, then type the rest while someone watches them. In which condition are they slower/faster? More/less prone to make errors? For a more precise comparison, have them take an online typing test in each condition. (A free typing test is available at Typingtest.com)Technology Tip: To demonstrate this effect, students can type part of a paper alone, then type the rest while someone watches them. In which condition are they slower/faster? More/less prone to make errors? For a more precise comparison, have them take an online typing test in each condition. (A free typing test is available at Typingtest.com)
12. Groups Action Theory of social facilitation (Zajonc, 1965)
Social Inhibition
Presence of others increases arousal
Arousal decreases a non-dominant response
Study of cockroaches (1969)
Presence of others can decrease people’s performance on unfamiliar, difficult tasks Technology Tip: To demonstrate this effect, students can type part of a paper alone, then type the rest while someone watches them. In which condition are they slower/faster? More/less prone to make errors? For a more precise comparison, have them take an online typing test in each condition. (A free typing test is available at Typingtest.com)Technology Tip: To demonstrate this effect, students can type part of a paper alone, then type the rest while someone watches them. In which condition are they slower/faster? More/less prone to make errors? For a more precise comparison, have them take an online typing test in each condition. (A free typing test is available at Typingtest.com)
13. Social Loafing“Free Rider Problem” Ringelmann (1913)
Farm workers – as number of workers increased, output did not increase as much.
People reduce effort when working in a group
Not individually identified or accountable
Not wanting to be a ‘sucker’
Bad apple effect
Discussion Tip: Ask students if social facilitation “rings true” for them in the case of group assignments. Do people seem to work harder in groups? Many will likely so no, mentioning the problem of “slackers.” Then introduce the concept of social loafing.
Discussion Tip: Ask students how group assignments might be modified to decrease social loafing. What instructions should be given? How should grades be determined?Discussion Tip: Ask students if social facilitation “rings true” for them in the case of group assignments. Do people seem to work harder in groups? Many will likely so no, mentioning the problem of “slackers.” Then introduce the concept of social loafing.
Discussion Tip: Ask students how group assignments might be modified to decrease social loafing. What instructions should be given? How should grades be determined?
14. Social Loafing“Free Rider Problem” Loafing is more likely to occur
When members are deindividuated: No individual accountability
When others are loafing
In men
Loafing is less likely to occur
When one’s cooperation is unique to the group
When the group is meaningful & cohesive Discussion Tip: Ask students if social facilitation “rings true” for them in the case of group assignments. Do people seem to work harder in groups? Many will likely so no, mentioning the problem of “slackers.” Then introduce the concept of social loafing.
Discussion Tip: Ask students how group assignments might be modified to decrease social loafing. What instructions should be given? How should grades be determined?Discussion Tip: Ask students if social facilitation “rings true” for them in the case of group assignments. Do people seem to work harder in groups? Many will likely so no, mentioning the problem of “slackers.” Then introduce the concept of social loafing.
Discussion Tip: Ask students how group assignments might be modified to decrease social loafing. What instructions should be given? How should grades be determined?
15. Punishing Cheaters and Free Riders Altruistic punishment
People will sometimes sacrifice their own gain, to benefit all, by punishing free riders
Goes against Economic theory which suggest we want to maximize our payoffs
May be considered guarding the culture
Culture depends on a system; cheat the system, ruin it for all
16. Shared Resources and the Commons Dilemma Costs of private ownership
Inequality
Ambition, greed
Cost of communal ownership
Lack of preserving care
Commons dilemma
Squandering of shared resources Technology Tip: See the special issue of Science magazine devoted to the tragedy of the commons and the additional resources available online.Technology Tip: See the special issue of Science magazine devoted to the tragedy of the commons and the additional resources available online.
17. Shared Resources and the Commons Dilemma Conflicts within commons dilemma
Social conscience versus selfish impulse
Time (Now versus tomorrow)
Factors influencing commons dilemma
Communication
Behavior of others Technology Tip: For recent research on the effectiveness of normative information on pro-environmental behavior, see the APA Monitor.Technology Tip: For recent research on the effectiveness of normative information on pro-environmental behavior, see the APA Monitor.
18. How Groups Think Brainstorming
A form of creative thinking
People enjoy the process and evaluate it favorably
Individuals want to participate in brainstorming
BUT: Output is lower than individuals working alone Technology Tip: Don Forsyth has provided a time line of group research from 1890 to 1960 at his website (http://www.richmond.edu/~dforsyth/gd/groups.pdf).Technology Tip: Don Forsyth has provided a time line of group research from 1890 to 1960 at his website (http://www.richmond.edu/~dforsyth/gd/groups.pdf).
19. How Groups Think Collective wisdom of group is better than individual experts
People must act as independent members of a group and share their diverse information
Examples: Galton’s study and Who Wants to be a Millionaire
20. Why Do People Love Teams? Many people believe teams
Make better decisions
Improve performance
People enjoy working on teams
Satisfies their need to belong
Feel confident, effective and superior
21. Transactive Memory Members of a small group remember different things
Begins at learning stage where group can decide roles for learning different things Teaching Tip: Demonstrate the benefits of transactive memory by asking four students to remember a long list of numbers: 6, 12, 25, 16, 55, 29 45, 9, 32, 41, 2, 15. Likely the students will fail. Next ask four students to remember the list, but give each student only three numbers to remember. Student one remembers , 12, 25; student two remembers 16, 55, 29, etc.Teaching Tip: Demonstrate the benefits of transactive memory by asking four students to remember a long list of numbers: 6, 12, 25, 16, 55, 29 45, 9, 32, 41, 2, 15. Likely the students will fail. Next ask four students to remember the list, but give each student only three numbers to remember. Student one remembers , 12, 25; student two remembers 16, 55, 29, etc.
22. Groupthink Tendency of group members to think alike
Specifically group clings to shared but flawed view rather than being open to the truth (Janus, 1972, 1982)
Roots in desire to get along
23. Groupthink Factors that encourage groupthink
Fairly similar and cohesive group to start
Strong, directive leader
Group is isolated in some sense from others
Group regards itself as superior
24. Groupthink Signs of groupthink
Pressure toward conformity
Appearance of unanimous agreement
Self-censorship
Illusion of invulnerability
Sense of moral superiority
Tendency to overestimate opponents Technology Tip: NASA has been accused of groupthink in the loss of the Columbia and Challenger shuttles. See, for example, “NASA’s Culture of Denial" at MSNBC.com (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3077543/).Technology Tip: NASA has been accused of groupthink in the loss of the Columbia and Challenger shuttles. See, for example, “NASA’s Culture of Denial" at MSNBC.com (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3077543/).
25. Committees Why aren’t committees effective?
Group harmony stifles free exchange of information
Focus on common knowledge rather than unique information people have
26. Committees How can they be effective?
Respect each other’s knowledge
Share individual knowledge
Allow each member to be individually responsible for one task / piece of information
27. Group Polarization and Risky Shift Risky shift
Group is willing to take greater risks than individuals (on average)
Group polarization effect
Movement toward either extreme (risk or caution) resulting from group discussion
Technology Tip: The Changing Minds website provides a nice overview of group polarization (http://changingminds.org/explanations/theories/group_polarization.htm).
Technology Tip: The Changing Minds website provides a description of the risky shift phenomenon, along with examples (http://changingminds.org/explanations/theories/risky_shift.htm).Technology Tip: The Changing Minds website provides a nice overview of group polarization (http://changingminds.org/explanations/theories/group_polarization.htm).
Technology Tip: The Changing Minds website provides a description of the risky shift phenomenon, along with examples (http://changingminds.org/explanations/theories/risky_shift.htm).
28. Leadership Traits of successful leaders
Humble and modest
Extreme persistence
Traits of people perceived as good leaders
Decisive
Competent at group tasks
Possess integrity
Honest and good moral character
Have vision
Technology Tip: Jim Collins (Good to Great) maintains an extensive website with may resources (http://www.jimcollins.com/).Technology Tip: Jim Collins (Good to Great) maintains an extensive website with may resources (http://www.jimcollins.com/).
29. Power One person’s control over another
Many powerful seek additional power
Relation between power and belongingness Morgenthau (1963)
Technology Tip: Additional details and resources on power are available at Beyondintractability.org
Technology Tip: Connections among roles, power, and behavior in both the Stanford prison study and Abu Ghraib prison are discussed in the APA online article, “How Psychology Can Help Explain the Iraqi Prisoner Abuse” (http://www.apa.org/ppo/issues/breckler604.html )Technology Tip: Additional details and resources on power are available at Beyondintractability.org
Technology Tip: Connections among roles, power, and behavior in both the Stanford prison study and Abu Ghraib prison are discussed in the APA online article, “How Psychology Can Help Explain the Iraqi Prisoner Abuse” (http://www.apa.org/ppo/issues/breckler604.html )
30. Effects of Power on Leaders Five crucial effects
Feels good
Alters attention to rewards and punishment
Changes the relationships between people
Makes people rely more on automatic processing
Removes inhibitions against taking action
Teaching Tip: You may wish to reference Zimbardo’s Stanford prison study here. See additional resources at Zimbardo’s webpage (http://www.zimbardo.com/zimbardo.html).Teaching Tip: You may wish to reference Zimbardo’s Stanford prison study here. See additional resources at Zimbardo’s webpage (http://www.zimbardo.com/zimbardo.html).
31. Effects of Power on Followers Followers pay extra attention to the powerful person and try to understand him/her
People with less power will be prone to fostering peace and harmony
People low in power adapt to the expectations of high-power people
32. Legitimate Leadership Maintenance of power is often dependent on legitimizing myth
Explanation and justification of why powerful people deserve to be in power