790 likes | 951 Views
SUPPLEMENTAL PAY. 2. Definitions of AY Review OMB Circular A-21 and UCB Faculty Handbook guidelinesEffects on effort reporting. Basic Definitions. 3. Academic Year (AY)Have some ambiguity when defining AYThe July 2001
E N D
1. PERS & Extra-compensation (aka Supplemental Pay)Training Module V: Compliance IssuesWednesday, July 23, 2008
Demetria Ross
Sponsored Projects Accounting
1
2. SUPPLEMENTAL PAY 2
Definitions of AY
Review OMB Circular A-21 and UCB Faculty Handbook guidelines
Effects on effort reporting
3. Basic Definitions 3 Academic Year (AY)
Have some ambiguity when defining AY
The July 2001 “Boulder Campus Policy on Additional Pay to Regular & Research Faculty says AY=August to May (i.e., Aug 15-May 15) [called UCB 2001 Policy]
UCB’s FTE Policy (Feb 2004) defines AY as Mid-August through Mid-May
However,
The Graduate Student Appointment Manual says AY=Sept 1 – May 31
PBS (Payroll) says AY appointments are generally made on a contract basis for Sept through May and the appointments are paid from Sept through May
4. Basic Definitions (cont’d) 4 Definition of AY generally based on PBS and payroll schedule
PBS states AY appointments will receive no pay during June, July & August
ePER system driven by monthly payroll, not term dates
ePER system divides year into 3 semesters based on full months
Fall (Sept-Dec)
Spring (Jan-May)
Summer (June-Aug)
Summer salary allocated to May (50% of monthly) will report as Spring wages on ePER
5. Compensation 5 AY Salary = Base Salary
Base salary determines what amounts can be earned during summer & what can be charged to sponsored projects
OMB Circular A-21: “Charges for work performed …during the AY will be based on…regular compensation for the continuous period which…constitutes the basis of his salary. Charges for work performed…during all or any portion of such period are allowable at the base salary rate.”
UCB 2001 Policy: AY salary is the sum paid in consideration of normal services rendered during AY, described as 9/9th of an AY faculty member’s salary
AY base salaries may be supplemented by variety of stipends & adjustments but that doesn’t increase base amount (need permission of Dean)
6. Allowable Additional Compensation 6 Not included in base salary
UCB 2001 Policy:
Overload teaching during AY – those activities in excess of teaching activities expected as part of the defined workload formula
Service that includes responsibility when it is not a regular and ongoing component of normal workload
Monetary awards for exceptional service, teaching, research, or other contributions
Compensation for consulting activities with entities not associated with the university
Dollar amount not restricted
Amount of time faculty can devote to consulting during AY is restricted to 1/6 of total time and effort
7. Compensation Limits 7 During AY
UCB 2001 Policy:
Prohibits AY faculty from supplementing their 9/9ths salary with grant funds or other university research salary during AY
May substitute some base salary with grant dollars if workload is adjusted
Needs permission of Dean
course buyout reduces university-paid salary
monthly base salary remains unchanged
8. Compensation Limits (cont’d) 8 During AY
OMB Circular A-21:
“In no event will charges to sponsored agreements…exceed the proportionate share of the base salary for that period.”
Intra university consulting is….a university obligation requiring no additional compensation to base salary
“However, in unusual cases where consultation is across departmental lines or involves a separate or remote operation, & the work performed by the consultant is in addition to his regular departmental load, any….extra compensation above base salary is allowable provided….specifically provided for in the agreement or approved in writing by sponsoring agency.”
9. Compensation Limits (cont’d) 9 Summer Salary Limitations
UCB 2001 Policy:
Allows a maximum of additional 3/9ths to be earned in salary for activities conducted in summer months, not to exceed 1/9th per month
Exceptions to maximum require prior approval of Dean’s office and Office of Faculty Affairs
3/9ths for summer salary includes:
Any salary paid from sponsored projects
Summer teaching for either summer school or continuing ed
Maymester is summer teaching, not AY overload
Administrative stipends (i.e., Dept Chairs and Faculty Directors)
This additional 3/9ths is calculated from the base salary, not on total compensation
10. Compensation Limits (cont’d) 10 Summer Salary Limitations
OMB Circular A-21:
Charges for work performed by faculty members on sponsored projects during the summer will be at the monthly rate of the base salary [for AY, generally 1/9th]
Doesn’t govern summer teaching or consulting:
Teaching during summer or other periods not included in base salary will be based on university policy governing such compensation
Non-institutional activities must follow the institution-wide policies & practices governing the permissible extent of such professional services
11. Compensation Limits (cont’d) 11 External Salary Caps
Federal:
Some federal agencies require salary cap for employees working on projects they fund
Current NIH cap (through 12/31/08) is $191,300
NSF will pay only 2 months summer effort
Private Agencies:
Some private agencies also set salary limits, such as American Cancer Society
To know if there are limits, look at the Additional Terms and Conditions Attachment of the Notice of Grant Award
12. Effects of Policy on Effort Reporting 12 ePER (effort report) reflects 100% of semester salary earned
Total salary always represents 100% (not 100% plus overload %)
Total can be distributed among various position numbers (AY pay & effort, summer pay & effort, chair, etc)
Spring ePER can also include ˝ month summer salary and effort in total semester pay
NOTE: 2001 UCB Policy on Additional Pay to Regular and Research Faculty
Directed to faculty on 100% AY or FY appointments
Faculty on less than 100% may take on additional duties and compensation equivalent to 100% FTE, as defined in their letter of appointment or reappointment
13. SPA ePER Contacts 13 epers@colorado.edu
Pat Dodson
Internal Compliance Coordinator
Pat.Dodson@colorado.edu
Jim Sheppard: ePERS Specialist
James.Sheppard@colorado.edu
Demetria Ross: Cost Sharing; ePERS back-up
Demetria.Ross@colorado.edu
See the UCB ABS website for ePERS policy and info on training opportunities http://abs.colorado.edu/
14. Charlene Lydick, C.P.M. Associate Director of Procurement
Procurement Service Center 14 Small Business Subcontracting PlansTraining Module V – Compliance Issues Wednesday, july 23, 2008
15. Small BusinessSubcontracting Plans What are they?
Statement of goals for subcontracting to
small business concerns
When are they required?
Federal Contracts where award is equal to
or greater than $550,000;
original or modified award
Per FAR 52.219.9
15
16. Small Business Concerns 16 Small Business
Small Disadvantaged Business
Woman-Owned Small Business
Historically Black Colleges/Universities & Minority Institutions
HUBZone Small Business
Veteran-Owned Small Business
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business
17. Plan Development 17 CU’s Small Business Program
https://www.cu.edu/psc/purchasing/sbp/
Contact us:
Small.Business@cu.edu
Pamela Andrade, Assistant Small Business Liaison Officer (Asst. SBLO)
303.315.2827 or Pamela.Andrade@cu.edu
Charlene Lydick, Assoc. Director of Procurement/SBLO
303.315.2780 or Charlene.Lydick@cu.edu
18. FUNDAMENTALS OF COMPLIANCE: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST & COMMITMENT
TRAINING MODULE V: COMPLIANCE ISSUES
WEDNESDAY, JULY 23, 2008
18
19. Conflicts of interest: 19 exist “when an employee’s financial or personal considerations may compromise, or have the appearance of compromising, an employee’s personal judgment in administration, management, instruction, research, and other professional and academic activities.”
APS on Conflicts of Interest and Commitment Your CU employment is considered your “primary” employment, and, thus, your primary responsibility and allegiance. Other interests are secondary, when it comes to how you perform your CU job.Your CU employment is considered your “primary” employment, and, thus, your primary responsibility and allegiance. Other interests are secondary, when it comes to how you perform your CU job.
20. Conflict of commitment: 20 “refers to situations in which outside relationships or activities adversely affect, or have the appearance of adversely affecting, an employee’s commitment to his/her University duties.”
APS on Conflicts of Interest and Commitment This is often referred to as the “1/6th rule”, referring to the policy that says that faculty may consult “on University time” up to 1/6th of their time and effort.This is often referred to as the “1/6th rule”, referring to the policy that says that faculty may consult “on University time” up to 1/6th of their time and effort.
21. Perception is reality 21 Conflict of interest/commitment programs deal with situations in which an employee’s judgment or commitment to the University could be compromised. It is the potential for compromise that is the most likely to cause harm. Often, people think that the only time there actually is a conflict is if they actually act on compromised judgment. In reality, the conflict exists whenever there are two different roles for an employee – as CU employee and as person with financial interests related to CU employment.Often, people think that the only time there actually is a conflict is if they actually act on compromised judgment. In reality, the conflict exists whenever there are two different roles for an employee – as CU employee and as person with financial interests related to CU employment.
22. What does a CoI/C program do? 22 Identify
Manage, reduce, eliminate
Notify
23. Identify 23 Disclosure of External Professional Activities (DEPA) (both CoI and CoC)
- Annual FOR ALL TENURE-TRACK AND RESEARCH FACULTY
(at employment and the beginning of the calendar year)
- On-line (CU Connect, Academics & Research tab)
- Review by CoI/C director
Determine no conflict; or,
Needs further review
Disclosure to OCG and HRC (CoI)
Application for Approval of Regular and Periodic Consulting Activities (CoC) (http://www.colorado.edu/facultyaffairs/atoz/ofaindex.html
- Review/Approval by Unit Head
The last one is often called the “1/6th rule” form.The last one is often called the “1/6th rule” form.
24. Where is the “line” - CoI? 24 Income of >$10,000/year (self, family member) from a business that is related to one’s University activities
Equity interests >$10,000 or 5% in a business that is related to one’s University activities
Service to company (e.g. Board of Directors)
Intellectual property rights
25. Where is the “line” – CoC? 25 Not remunerative scholarship
1/6th rule (generally > 19.5 days/semester)
Interference with “paramount obligations to students, colleagues, and the primary missions of the University.”
1. Remunerative scholarship refers to such things as textbook authorship, involvement with professional societies, and participation on review panels, etc.
2. Traditionally, the University has allowed full-time faculty to be employed in remunerative consultative or research capacities when such employment did not involve more than one-sixth of their time and energy.
3. a conflict of commitment arises when professional service or research contracted outside the University, consultations, or other outside activities (e.g., outside teaching or business) interfere with the paramount obligations to students, colleagues, and the primary missions of the University.
1. Remunerative scholarship refers to such things as textbook authorship, involvement with professional societies, and participation on review panels, etc.
2. Traditionally, the University has allowed full-time faculty to be employed in remunerative consultative or research capacities when such employment did not involve more than one-sixth of their time and energy.
3. a conflict of commitment arises when professional service or research contracted outside the University, consultations, or other outside activities (e.g., outside teaching or business) interfere with the paramount obligations to students, colleagues, and the primary missions of the University.
26. Manage, reduce, eliminate 26 CoI/C director gathers information from discloser
Provides analysis to unit head & discloser
Is there a conflict, and, if so, why is it a conflict
Suggestions of how to manage, reduce, eliminate
Unit head determines if conflict, and how to manage
Unit head and discloser sign MOU, send to dean
Dean makes decision, notifies discloser and CoI/C
27. Notify 27 NIH
notify that conflicts have been identified before submission of proposal
notify that conflicts have been managed before funds disbursed
NSF
notify of any conflicts that institution cannot manage
CU
administration gets annual report
28. Examples (generic) 28 Professor Zen receives $15,000/year for consulting for a company that has also given a large gift to support his research program. Several students are supported by that gift.
Is this a conflict of interest?
- Yes – it involves issues of scientific integrity and relationships with students.
How would it be managed?
1. Disclosure to journals and in public presentations where results are presented
2. Disclosure to students and committee members (if applicable).
Is this a conflict of commitment?
- No - not as presented
29. Examples #2 (generic) 29 Professor Yang receives >$10,000/year as an editor of a prestigious journal; he spends one day/month on this activity.
Is this a conflict of interest?
No, this is remunerated scholarship. It does not need to be reported on the DEPA.
Is this a conflict of commitment?
No, not as reported.
30. Example #3 (generic) 30 Professor Xavier has a contract to conduct a large survey of satisfaction of hearing aid users for a company in which she owns a substantial share.
Is this a conflict of interest?
- Yes – it involves issues of scientific integrity, and protection of human subjects.
How would it be managed?
1. Disclosure to journals and in public presentations
2. Disclosure to subjects
3. Possible scientific oversight of conduct of project.
Is this a conflict of commitment?
- No - not as described.
31. Example #4 (generic) 31 Professor Wren is assisting a small start-up company for free, in an area related to his University work. He is spending approximately 20 hours/week helping to get it up and going. He does most of the work on nights and weekends, but at times needs to be on site for a day or two every week.
Is this a conflict of interest?
- No.
Is this a conflict of commitment?
- Yes. His effort exceeds the 1/6th rule. (The 1/6th rule applies 24/7 during the appointment year.)
How would it be managed?
1. Leave for some period of time;
2. Reduction of the appointment percentage.
32. Information and help 32 (http://www.cu.edu/policies/Academic/coninterest.html)
http://www.colorado.edu/VCResearch/ORI/coic.html
http://www.colorado.edu/facultyaffairs/atoz/one-sixth-rule.pdf.
Jean Wylie, Compliance Director
Jean.Wylie@colorado.edu or 303.492.3024
Russell Moore, Associate VC for Research
Russell.Moore@colorado.edu or 303.492.2899
33. Radiation SafetyTraining Module V: Compliance IssueWednesday, July 23, 2008 Michelle Law, Radiation Safety Officer
Department Environmental Health & Safety 33
34. Radiation Safety 34 Responsible for reviewing safety of research involving:
Radioactive Materials (Approx 125 PIs using Unsealed & Sealed Sources)
Radiation Producing Machines (Approx 35 X-rays)
Lasers (Under Development)
Personnel:
Full-time Radiation Safety Officer (RSO)
Full-time Alternate RSO (ARSO)
2 Radiation Safety Specialists, 1 Part-Time Student
10 Committee Members (UCB and UCCS)
Unique situation for RAM under one license, UCDHSC under different licenseUnique situation for RAM under one license, UCDHSC under different license
35. Radiation Safety 35 Physical Safety
Protection of personnel, environment, and property
License Review, Equipment, Cradle to Grave
Administrative Safety
Protection from Regulatory Citations
Developing/modifying procedures as needed
Review of proposed experiments
Ensure proper equipment is used (shielding, hoods, refrigerators/freezers, waste containers, etc.)
Receipt, Use, and Disposal (order approvals – currently working with PSC, receiving materials daily, weekly waste collections & processing for disposal)
Regulatory requirements (control of materials from cradle to grave, security changes)Review of proposed experiments
Ensure proper equipment is used (shielding, hoods, refrigerators/freezers, waste containers, etc.)
Receipt, Use, and Disposal (order approvals – currently working with PSC, receiving materials daily, weekly waste collections & processing for disposal)
Regulatory requirements (control of materials from cradle to grave, security changes)
36. Radiation Safety 36 Training
Initial Training for Unsealed materials in our office
Other training is available on-line or by request
Unsealed Refresher Training
Sealed Source Training & Refresher
X-ray Training & Refresher
New Requirements
Security
Previously Exempt Materials (NORM)
37. Contact Information
Environmental Health and Safety
(303) 492-6025
Radiation Safety Office
(303) 492-6523
Michelle.Law@colorado.edu
www.colorado.edu/radsafety Radiation Safety 37
38. Animal Resources Contact Info 38 http://www.colorado.edu/VCResearch/AnimalResources/index.html
Albert R. Petkus, DVM, ACLAMDirector, Animal ResourcesUniversity of Colorado - BoulderUCB 345Boulder CO 80309ph 303 492-3411fax 303 492 -2967albert.petkus@colorado.edu
39. Animal Resources Contact Info (cont’d) 39 Silvia N. Iorio
Program Coordinator/IACUC Administrator
Institutional Biosafety Committee
University of Colorado-Boulder
Muenzinger Psychology - Room E227
Campus Box UCB 345
Boulder, CO 80309
303 492-8187 office
303 492-2967 fax
Silvia.Iorio@colorado.edu
IACUC meetings occur on the 3rd Wednesday of every month. Deadline for Animal Care and Use Protocol submission is one and one-half weeks (Monday) prior to IACUC meeting
40. Human Research Committee(HRC)Training Module V: Compliance issuesWednesday, July 23, 2008
Claire Dunne
HRC Education Coordinator
Wednesday July 23, 2008 40
41. Research with human subjects Your ethical responsibilities 41
42. Human Research Committee (HRC) Federally mandated
Reviews research involving human subjects to ensure that research is conducted ethically and safely 42
43. What is Research? 43 A systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.
Systematic: a process for data to be considered valid, thus able to be generalized so that the activity might be considered research.
Designed to: a deliberate intent to create or add to generalizable knowledge.
Generalizable: relevant to more than the particular circumstance that produces it and intended to be shared for a broader audience.
44. What is a Human Subject? 44
A living individual about whom an investigator conducting research obtains:
Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or
Identifiable private information.
45CFR46.102(f)
45. Is It Human Subject Research? 45 1979 The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
1979 The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
46. Approval process 46 Class projects not resulting in publication
Instructor applies to the HRC for approval
Honors theses, other independent research that may result in publication
Requires individual approval
Refer to the HRC website for instructions and forms
HRC website: http://www.colorado.edu/VCResearch/HRC/index.html
47. CITI Tutorial 47 CITI tutorial: http://www.colorado.edu/VCResearch/HRC/EducationalTools.html
Complete the “Students in Research” module for class projects
For independent research complete the “Social Behavioral Research” or “Biomedical Research” module, as appropriate
48.
On-line system – IRB Manager Submitting to the HRC 48
49. HRC Staff Melissa Diemer
Program Coordinator
Melissa.Diemer@Colorado.EDU
303-735-3702
Amanda Whitson
Social / Behavioral Panel Coordinator
Richard Husser
Biomedical Panel Coordinator Erin Coons, CIP
Quality Assurance Coordinator
Claire Dunne, PhD
Education Coordinator
Joseph Rosse, PhD
Director, Office of Research Integrity 49
50. Institutional Biosafety Committee Compliance Training module V: compliance issuesWednesday, July 23, 2008 Denise A. Donnelly, Campus Biosafety Officer
Department of Environmental Health & Safety
51. Institutional Biosafety Committee The Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) is responsible for reviewing all University research and teaching activities involving the use of biohazards, recombinant DNA molecules, select agents, or bloodborne pathogens.
52. Institutional Biosafety Committee Who Are We?
IBC Membership includes:
No fewer than five members with the appropriate expertise in recombinant DNA technology
Biological Safety Officer
At least one individual with expertise in animal containment principles for rDNA research involving animals
At least one individual with expertise in plant, plant pathogen, or plant pest containment principles for rDNA research involving plants
At least two members not otherwise affiliated with the institution
53. Institutional Biosafety Committee Biohazards consist of the following:
Infectious/pathogenic agents classified in the following categories: Risk Group 1, 2, 3, or 4 bacterial, fungal, parasitic, viral, rickettsial or Chlamydia agents or,
Plants, animals or derived wastes which contain or may contain pathogenic hazards (including xenotransplantation tissue) or,
Human and nonhuman primate tissue, body fluid, and cell culture (primary or continuous) or,
54. Institutional Biosafety Committee Biohazards consist of the following:
Pathogenic microorganisms that are present in human blood and can cause disease in humans. These pathogens include, but are not limited to, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or,
Administration of hazardous materials to animals and their associated tissues and body fluids or,
55. Institutional Biosafety Committee Biohazards consist of the following:
Select Agents - specifically regulated pathogens and toxins as defined in Title 42, CFR, Part 73, Title 9 CFR 121, and Title 7 CFR 331. These agents have the potential to pose harm to human health, animal health or products, and/or plant health or products or,
Other agents that have the potential for causing disease in healthy individuals, animals, or plants.
56. Recombinant DNA Research
Must comply with the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving recombinant DNA Molecules
http://www4.od.nih.gov/oba/rac/
guidelines/guidelines.html Institutional Biosafety Committee
57. Institutional Biosafety Committee
58. Institutional Biosafety Committee Responsibilities of Biosafety Officer:
Member of the IBC
Member of the IACUC
Review HRC Applications
Develop and Manage Campus Biosafety Program
59. Institutional Biosafety Committee Campus Biosafety Program consists of:
Compliance with Federal, State, local, and funding agency laws and requirements
Compliance lab inspections
Training – Biological Lab Safety, Bloodborne Pathogen, Packaging & Shipping
Management and disposal of biological waste
Import/Export of biological, animal, and plant materials
60. Institutional Biosafety Committee IBC Contact Information
IBC Chair
Dr. Gretchen H. Stein gretchen.stein@colorado.edu
(303) 492-5229
Biosafety Officer
Denise A. Donnelly denise.donnelly@colorado.edu
(303) 492-7072
IBC Administrator
Silvia Iorio silvia.iorio@colorado.edu
(303) 492-8187
61. RESEARCH MISCONDUCTTRAINING MODULE V: COMPLIANCE ISSUESWEDNESDAY, JULY 23, 2008
Joe Rosse
Research Integrity Officer
Wednesday July 23, 2008
62. What is Research Misconduct? The Federal Big Three
Fabrication*
Falsification*
Plagiarism
Other serious deviations from accepted practices
CU adds:
Authorship disputes Fabrication: making up data, notes, or other research information and reporting them.
Falsification: manipulation of the research process, or altering data, such that reported results are not accurate.
Plagiarism: portraying another person's intellectual property as one's own. Not simply wholesale “cut and paste”’; may involve appropriating ideas, concepts, or data without credit and then changing the actual language so as to give the impression that the ideas are one's own, or providing a citation for one particular use, but then making extended future use of the original work without further citation.
Discuss why this is important:
Public investment in research requires accountability
Research is cumulative, researchers generally assume that others’ reports are accurateFabrication: making up data, notes, or other research information and reporting them.
Falsification: manipulation of the research process, or altering data, such that reported results are not accurate.
Plagiarism: portraying another person's intellectual property as one's own. Not simply wholesale “cut and paste”’; may involve appropriating ideas, concepts, or data without credit and then changing the actual language so as to give the impression that the ideas are one's own, or providing a citation for one particular use, but then making extended future use of the original work without further citation.
Discuss why this is important:
Public investment in research requires accountability
Research is cumulative, researchers generally assume that others’ reports are accurate
63. What Research Misconduct is NOT Honest error
vs. intentional or reckless
Honest differences of opinion or interpretation
Anything not involved in proposing, conducting, or reporting research
Violations of other policies (e.g., fiscal misconduct, conflict of interest)
64. Investigation of Research Misconduct Concerns may be addressed to Research Integrity Officer (Joe Rosse)
Standing Committee on Research Misconduct will conduct inquiry
Normally a very confidential process
65. EXPORT CONTROLS TRAINING MODULE V: COMPLIANCE ISSUESWEDNESDAY, JULY 23, 2008
Joe Rosse & Linda Morris
Office of Research Integrity
Wednesday July 23, 2008
66. Export Controls National Security
Defense-related technology
“Dual-Use” technology
National/Foreign Policy
Embargoed countries
Banned groups or individuals
67. Export Controls Restrictions Physical exports - rare
Laptop computers usually not a problem
“Deemed exports” – more common
Transfer of knowledge to foreign nationals, even if the transfer occurs in U.S.
Via documents, emails, even site visits
Collaboration with foreign scientists or students is most common example
68. Export Controls Restrictions Financial transactions with embargoed countries
Balkans, Belarus, Burma, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Ivory Coast, Liberia, N. Korea, Sudan, Syria, Zimbabwe
Travel ban with Cuba
Transcations with people/companies on various Denied Parties Lists
69. Export Controls Implications Exports—physical or “deemed”—may require a license, depending on:
Type of technology
What the other nation is
Whether an exemption applies
Fundamental research/public domain
Education
Laptop computer/PDA/cell phone
Where you travel and who you talk with may be restricted
Check with Linda Morris to determine
70. Contractor Code of Business EthicsFAR 52.203-13Training Module V: Compliance IssuesWednesday, July 23, 2008 Kathleen R. Lorenzi
Office of Contract and Grants
71. FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics
72. FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics
73. FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics
74. FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics
75. FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics
76. FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics
77. FAR 52.203-13, Contractor Code of Business Ethics
78. Contact Information Randall Draper - OCG (303) 492-2695
Kathleen Lorenzi – OCG (303) 492-2692
Demetria Ross – SPA (303) 735-5083
Charlene Lydick - PSC (303) 315-2780
Jean Wylie – COI (303) 492-3024
Michelle Law – EHS (303) 492-6523
Al Petkus – LAR (303) 492-4311
Claire Dunne – HRC (303) 735-5014
Denise Donnelly – EHS (303) 492-7072
Joe Rosse – ORI (303) 735-5809
Linda Morris – ORI (303) 492-2889 78
79. THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING 79