60 likes | 71 Views
This article emphasizes the importance of conducting suicide risk assessments in clinical and school settings. The risk of suicide can fluctuate and is influenced by various factors, necessitating a personalized approach. It discusses the need to prioritize risk factors, differentiate between chronic and acute factors, and weigh them against protective factors. The text emphasizes that assigning a risk level requires clinical judgment and is a tool to guide treatment decisions. Schools are advised to implement standardized procedures, maintain communication with mental health providers, offer a range of services, train staff, and establish clear re-entry and safety protocols.
E N D
Conducting suicide risk assessment in clinical and school settings Max Banilivy, PhD mbanilivy@pedersonkrag.org
No current SI does not mean no imminent risk • Risk fluctuates. • There are other risk factors to consider.
There are many risk factors for suicide • It helps to prioritize • Distinguish distal/chronic factors and Proximal/acute factors • Weigh risk factors against protective factors
Assigning a risk level is not a formula • It takes clinical judgment to effectively apply general risk factors to create an individualized risk profile. • Assigning a risk level is a tool to inform treatment decisions.
To effectively help students with suicide risk, schools need: • Standardized referral and risk assessment procedures • Relationships/communication with MH providers • A continuum of services/alternatives to hospital referral • Training of school mental health professionals • Coordination of discharge planning • Clear procedures for school re-entry and safety planning
Thank you. Conducting suicide risk assessment in clinical and school settings