1 / 11

THE EVALUATION OF DEVELOPMENT AND OF THEMATIC KNOWLEDGE

THE EVALUATION OF DEVELOPMENT AND OF THEMATIC KNOWLEDGE. FEPA Jury Seminar for Thematic Philately Essen 2013. 2. 1. How to evaluate Thematic Development. TITLE. Plan page. Story line. 3. Story line. Pag. 2.

bergere
Download Presentation

THE EVALUATION OF DEVELOPMENT AND OF THEMATIC KNOWLEDGE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE EVALUATION OF DEVELOPMENT AND OF THEMATIC KNOWLEDGE FEPA Jury Seminar for Thematic Philately Essen 2013

  2. 2 1 How to evaluate Thematic Development TITLE Planpage Storyline 3 Storyline Pag. 2 Title & Plan, and Developmentare components of the main criterion named Treatment. Pag. n

  3. Storyline Story line– detailed view atpage level

  4. Development (maximum: 15 points) GREV provides us with five evaluation criteria: • elaboration of all aspects of the plan • correct assembly and positioning of the items in conformity with the plan • balance, by giving to each thematic point the importance corresponding to its significance within the theme • connection between the items and the thematic text • depth, shown through connections, cross references, ramifications, causes and effects

  5. How to reach a maximum of consistency? • Evaluation of thematic exhibits requires capabilities on three different levels: • knowledge and understanding of evaluation criteria (1st level) • broad thematic and philatelic knowledge (2nd level) • consistent allotment of points according to criteria requires an agreement about proper scales (3rd level) • “Starting level” at 80% • average of thematic exhibits at FIP exhibitions (80.5 points) • proposal: 80% = absense of errors, but nothing special

  6. Development (maximum: 15 points) • aspects which are required for 12 out of 15 points: • elaboration of all aspects of the plan • correct assembly and positioning of the items in conformity with the plan • balance, by giving to each thematic point the importance corresponding to its significance within the theme • necessary connection between the items and the thematic text • aspects which award additional points: • perfect connection between the items and the thematic text • depth, shown through connections, cross references, ramifications, causes and effects

  7. Thematic knowledge Components of Thematic Knowledge: • factual knowledge of the chosen theme (both, general and detailed) • knowledge of the philatelic material available for that theme • background knowledge of this philatelic material (design, reason for issue etc.) • knowledge of the specific importance of the philatelic pieces (“specific” = within the theme): Which items are seen as “key pieces” by the community of collectors of that field? • presence of new thematic findings for the theme • use of material that has a thematic qualification which is not immediately obvious and needs to be discovered by the exhibitor

  8. Thematic knowledge (aspects of study and research) Components of Thematic Knowledge: • factual knowledge of the chosen theme (both, general and detailed) • knowledge of the philatelic material available for that theme • background knowledge of this philatelic material (design, reason for issue etc.) • knowledge of the specific importance of the philatelic pieces (“specific” = within the theme): Which items are seen as “key pieces” by the community of collectors of that field? • presence of new thematic findings for the theme • use of material that has a thematic qualification which is not immediately obvious and needs to be discovered by the exhibitor

  9. Thematic knowledge (maximum: 15 points) GREV provides us with four evaluation criteria: • appropriateness, conciseness and correctness of thematic text • correct thematic use of the material • presence of new thematic findings for the theme • use of material that has a thematic qualification which is not immediately obvious and needs to be discovered by the exhibitor

  10. Thematic knowledge (maximum: 15 points) • aspects which are required for 12 out of 15 points: • appropriateness, conciseness and correctness of thematic text • correct thematic use of the material • aspects which award additional points: • presence of new thematic findings for the theme • use of material that has a thematic qualification which is not immediately obvious and needs to be discovered by the exhibitor

  11. Thematic knowledge (maximum: 15 points) • aspects which are required for 12 out of 15 points: • appropriateness, conciseness and correctness of thematic text • correct thematic use of the material • aspects which award additional points: • presence of new thematic findings for the theme • use of material that has a thematic qualification which is not immediately obvious and needs to be discovered by the exhibitor Research resulting in a new plan => innovation !

More Related