140 likes | 288 Views
Nanotechnology and Societal Transformation. Michael M. Crow Daniel Sarewitz Columbia University. Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology NSF/NSTC’s NSET September 28-29, 2000. Current Policy Approach. Addresses: Conduct of S&T Products and processes of S&T Assumes:
E N D
Nanotechnology and Societal Transformation Michael M. Crow Daniel Sarewitz Columbia University Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology NSF/NSTC’s NSET September 28-29, 2000
Current Policy Approach • Addresses: • Conduct of S&T • Products and processes of S&T • Assumes: • All societal outcomes will be positive INPUTS Processes Products Outcomes
Human Context for Technological Change • Usually not consensual • Winners and losers • Changing social structure
Nanotechnology as a Unique Opportunity to Move From “Billiards” to “Ecosystems” Billiards Reactive, discontinuous, disruptive, and sequential Ecosystems Different sectors and activities continually co-evolve
Interfaces Science Policy Outcomes Conduct of Science
Societal Outcomes • Social equity • Distribution of the benefits of S&T • Social purpose • Goals we want to pursue or advance • Social and economic enterprises • Shape of institutions at the interface between technology and society
Indications ofSocietal Transformation • GMOs controversy • Affordability of AIDS drugs • 40 million Americans without medical insurance • The aging of our population • Public school system/new knowledge economy • Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels
Cycle Dynamics Education New skills Societal Outcomes Economic Outcomes New social structures POLICY New industries New institutions S&T Outcomes Conduct of Science Tech transfer Partnerships Knowledge transfer
Studying the Science-Society Interface Analysis Enterprise Assessment Communication Technology Assessment
Understanding the Dynamics of the Science-Society Interface • Analysis of past and current societal responses to transforming technologies • Comprehensive, real time assessment and monitoring of the nano S&T enterprise • Communication initiative to foster dialogue among scientists, technologists, policy-makers, the media, and the public • Constructive technology assessment process with appropriate participants
Communication Media Developers Science Policy Public
Research Agenda • Analysis • Case histories: how has society responded to technological advance? • Roles and relations between the media, academia, policy makers, institutions and cultural factors: what are the alternative trajectories of technology-induced social change? • Enterprise assessment • Track a database of important nano activities over time: what are the directions of research? What resources are used? Public and private sector activities? Publications and patents? Institutional roles?
Research Agenda (cont’d) • Communication • Track and enhance processes by which nano diffuses from the lab to the outside world • Monitor how public attitudes evolve and how they feed back into the innovation system • Identify determinants of effective communication • Technology assessment • Map prospective innovation paths and develop metrics for measuring progress • Bring together researchers, policy makers, and the public to link innovation to decisions and social goals
Goal • Integrate societal outcomes research with the R&D process in order to more successfully manage the interaction of new knowledge and innovation with society Science Policy Outcomes Conduct of Science