Norm obedience in student houses IN THE Partium region

1. Normobedience in student houses IN THE Partium region University of Debrecen, Hungary

2. Research question • Educational role • Explicit and implicit rules and regulations • Rules and self-governance • Practices

3. Overview • Partium • Institutions • Diminishing civil society and self-governance (Documents analysis) • Social integration(Database analysis) • Conclusion

4. Partium • University of Debrecen • 16 Student houses + 2 Student hotels • 4751 beds • 3628 constructed or reconstructed in the last 10 years • 4 Private Public Partnership

5. Services offered Low service • High service • University owns and runs it student house committee coordinates • Strong self-governance • Formal-informal rules • University owns, market oriented firm runs it and the student council coordinates • No self-governance • Strict formal rules

6. How has self-governance disappeared? Analysis of database Document analysis Campus Life Journal 1984-2011 Campus-life online database 2010 N=4828 Weighted in terms of sex, faculty Socialintegrity Volunteer civil associations 1997-Insufficient publicity 2001-Financial support Growing institutional control 2004-Public places 2009-Political scenes

7. Educational background of residential college students

8. Social integrity of residential college students

9. Social Integrity-Student lifestyle indicators Scale • -100 - 100 • 0 – 100 • 0 – 100 • 0 - 100 • Going home • Group participation • Extracurricular activities • Activities • Places • Attitudes towards values • general values • professional values • academic values

10. Goinghome-Classificationtree77% of thecasesclassifiedcorrectly Food No Yes 16,3% 79,2 % Financially beneficial I meet my old friends Yes No Yes ? No 6,8 % 9,4 % 27,1% 20,9% 31,2% Independent lifestyle Dependent lifestyle Reciprocitybasedfamiliarhelp

11. Discriminant analysis: residence50.4% of residential college students,54% of studentslivingwithparentspredictedcorrectly

12. Typology I.: Value preferences

13. Residential college students’ value preferences

14. Discriminantanalysis:Loneliness59.7% of lonely and 64.2% of not lonely predicted correctly

15. Conclusion Institutions Coordinating student council and market oriented firms are against self-governance and civil society Strong institutional regulations Students lifestyle Strong familiar attachments Stress to meet social, financial and academic expectations Restructure of socialsupportnetwork is problematical Insufficientsocialintegrity

16. Thanksforyourkindattention pataki.gyongyver@gmail.com

17. 1949 - 1989 - 2011 1949 2011 1989 • Strong civil society • Events: clubs, concerts, art and pipeexhibitions, cafes • Rituals: Kun Béla running, Benczúr week • Freelyaccessibleequipment and rooms:tabletennis, free copyingopportunity • Freelyaccessibleequipment: ski and alpinistequipment, sewingmashine, library, • Giveplacetoevents: bookreviews, clubs, professionalmeetings • Courses: sewing, guitar, aerobic, classicaldance, cooking • Trips • Financial support: Swimmingpass, rituals • Professionality • Community • Socialresponsibility • Resocialization processes • Financial cutbacks • Culturalforum • Insignificant rituals • No multi-functional places • No free services • No civil society • No self-governance