1 / 10

Evaluating with Multimedia Tools

Evaluating with Multimedia Tools. Harouna Ba EDC Center for Children & Technology www.edc.org/CCT. Evaluation Goals. Impact of a Complex Multimedia Science Project on Students’ Experiences and Learning Diverse population of students. Methods.

Download Presentation

Evaluating with Multimedia Tools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluating with Multimedia Tools Harouna Ba EDC Center for Children & Technology www.edc.org/CCT

  2. Evaluation Goals • Impact of a Complex Multimedia Science Project on Students’ Experiences and Learning • Diverse population of students

  3. Methods • Print: interviews, surveys, and questionnaires, classroom observations, and inquiry tools • Video-assessment • Online databases: journals, message boards, and chat.

  4. Multimedia Tool Affordances • Print: • Contextual information • Students’ learning • Video-assessment and online databases: • Reliability issues • Complexity of students’ learning • Technology use

  5. Major Findings • JASON IMPACT ON TEACHERS • JASON changes teaching practice in terms of collaboration, project-based learning and alternative assessment. • JASON increases teachers’ use of technology.

  6. Major Findings (Cont.) • JASON IMPACT ON STUDENT LEARNING • JASON hands-on and environmental exploration activities are engaging and appealing to the students. • JASON curriculum makes science real and relevant. • Most JASON students acquired scientific inquiry and analytical skills, and outperformed non-JASON students.

  7. Major Findings (Cont.) • COMMON CONTEXTUAL ISSUES AND CHALLENGES • Curriculum • Teachers • School and district requirements

  8. Major Findings (Cont.) • The success of JASON depends on the teacher. • The project attracts teachers who take a hands-on approach to science and enjoy learning new subjects. • The project gives teachers ideas for labs and activities. • The project requires dedication and innovation on the part of teachers.

  9. Major Findings (Cont.) • The JASON curriculum is adaptable. • Teachers pick and choose activities from the curriculum. • Teachers select activities that support state and district standards. • Teacher reuse activities.

  10. Major Findings (Cont.) • District and School constraints impeded the process. • Even inexpensive materials add up in cost when used with many students. • Schools/districts do not always pay for training for all JASON teachers. • Teachers have no time to coordinate interdisciplinary projects with other teachers. • Lack of access to technology prevents teachers from taking advantage of online resources. • Stressed teachers cannot integrate new material into existing curriculum.

More Related