Your Infrastructure:- Choosing & Using Your Guidelines

1. Your Infrastructure:-Choosing & Using Your Guidelines Getting Started With Your Systematic Review A Workshop by:- Kendall Searle JosefineAntoniades

2. HOW? A collaborative workshop format! This work shop will not address:- • The different syntax used for different search engines (Anne Young) • Concepts concerning bias • The tools needed to appraise the quality of your articles • Key analysis approaches e.g.: narrative and meta analysis These will be covered in forthcoming workshops! This work shop will help you to:- • Refine your research question • Give you feedback on your research question • Give you search-strategy leads • Provide some infrastructure to facilitate a systematic approach • Give practical time-saving tips • Reflect a student’s real learning!

3. How we are going to divide our time:-

4. Every Body Panic Now! You have to do a SYSTEMATIC what??!!

5. Exercise One: Everybody Panic Now! • Arrange yourselves into groups • Each group to receive one envelope • Inside each envelope you will find a set of phrases • You have five minutes to read each of the phrases in turn and then place them in a logical order • Once you have decided your order, use the blue-tack to stick them up on the white-board.

6. After the Panic Comes Order! • What do you notice about the orders? • Where have you seen these statements before? • What is the gold standard approach? • How does the gold standard differ from the average student experience? • If you are time and resource poor, which steps might you cut out? • What is the consequence of this? • What other steps, if any, would you add? See Hand Out: Exercise 1:Everybody Panic Now

8. http://www.prisma-statement.org/2.1.2%20-%20PRISMA%202009%20Checklist.pdfhttp://www.prisma-statement.org/2.1.2%20-%20PRISMA%202009%20Checklist.pdf Systematic Reviews

9. Systematic Reviews

10. What is a Systematic Review? A trusty route map!

11. Top Tips from a Newly Initiated Student • Infrastructureis your Protocol. A plan for resource allocation! • Infrastructure avoids bias! • Infrastructure helps you to manage your supervisor and collaborators – and look good! • Infrastructure aids writing up by giving you personal targets • Infrastructure makes analysis quick and easy! Even the greatest of works needed infrastructure to aid the making!

12. Facilitate Your Briefing With An Easy to Use List:- Source: Common mental disorder among factory workers in mainland China:- a systematic review by Kendall Searle

13. YOUR PRISMA FLOW CHART Don’t be shy about writing it up as you go along. Use it as a reward system for yourself! It keeps track of your work and needs to be included in your final paper anyway!

14. Maximise on End Note As A Site to:- • Download each of your database searches • Deal with duplicates • Record each of your screening steps • Code your screen-outs • Build a PDF resource • Write-up with citations Source: Common Mental Disorders Amongst Migrant/Factory Workers in Mainland China: Coding in Progress

15. Which Guide For You? CONSORT 2010 Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (1996) Initial scope covers two-armed, parallel, randomized, controlled trials Extensions for non-inferiority, equivalence, factorial, cluster, crossover trials 25-point check list (but lots of a’s and b’s!) Reporting of funding & ethics advised but not in check list Institute of Medicine, USA www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Finding-What-Works-in-Health-Care-Standards-for-Systematic-Reviews.aspx Emphasizes team approach Itemizes conflict of interest and funding concerns Considers qualitative alongside quantitative review Divides standards into 4 activity groups PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (2009) Handy PICOS to help frame your question Covers non-randomisedstudies to assess the benefits and harms of interventions Can be modified for diagnosis or prognosis 27-point check list Clear, complete and transparent reporting of trial information to provide an unbiased evidence-base for decision making

16. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

17. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

18. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

19. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

20. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

21. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

22. Refining Your Research Question A student case study Common Mental Disorders amongst Migrants/Factory Workers in Mainland China

23. PICOS:-Frames your research interest to improve the explicitness of your review question

24. Important Websites • The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions www.cochrane.org/handbook • PRISMA Transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses http://www.prisma-statement.org/ • Institute of Medicine, USA. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Finding-What-Works-in-Health-Care-Standards-for-Systematic-Reviews.aspx • International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO