150 likes | 295 Views
Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline?. Gez Cornish & Neeltje Kielen HR Wallingford Ltd. UK. Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline?. Summary:. Based on field studies in Nairobi and Kumasi The need for a typology of wastewater irrigation
E N D
Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? Gez Cornish & Neeltje Kielen HR Wallingford Ltd. UK
Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? Summary: • Based on field studies in Nairobi and Kumasi • The need for a typology of wastewater irrigation • Variations in microbiological water quality • Positive impacts of wastewater irrigation • What are the trade-offs? • The need for “interim” water quality standards
Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? The need for a typology of wastewater irrigation : • Great variation exists in wastewater: • sources • conveyance systems • treatment • in-field management • A typology is essential to guide discussion of practice or the formulation of guidelines or regulations.
Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? A proposedtypology Conveyance Treatment Disposal Source Formal collection network River or surface water body Conventional Industrial Groundwater recharge Road tankers Natural / Biological Municipal Natural drainage None Irrigation Informal Backyard Informal or formal use Indirect use Direct use Indirect use Direct use Informal use Formal use = Use of wastewater with a certain level of permission and control by state agencies Informal use = Use of wastewater lacking permission and control by state agencies Direct use = Wastewater conveyed to a defined area for irrigation Indirect use = Wastewater discharged into water bodies with scattered and uncontrolled downstream abstraction
Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? Examples - Mau Mau Bridge, Nairobi Informal, indirect. Untreated municipal waste. Natural drainage channels running to river. Surface & overhead irrigation of vegetable crops sold in local Nairobi markets.
Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? Examples - Maili Saba, Nairobi Informal, indirect. Untreated municipal waste diverted from sewer to fields. Surface irrigation of vegetable crops grown for home consumption and sold in local Nairobi markets.
Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? Examples - Asago, Kumasi Informal, indirect. Untreated municipal & industrial waste. Natural drainage to river + dumping by vault emptying tankers. Overhead irrigation of vegetable crops, grown mainly for Kumasi market.
Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? Variations in water quality - Nairobi
Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? Variations in water quality - Kumasi
Area Study area irrigated (ha) No. of HHs (ha) Kumasi 502,700 12,700 11,900 Nairobi 125,700 3,700 2,220 Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? Positive impacts
Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? Positive impacts Nairobi Kumasi Kale, tomato, spinach, green maize, cabbage Tomato, garden egg, okra, chilli Main crops Av. Revenue US$ / ha 1,770 (annual) 544 (7 months) Total value of production US$ 3.9 million US$ 6 million
Profit $US Plot area ha Revenue $US Cost $US Farmer 1 2 3 4 5 6 Overall 237 232 -4 0.109 417 1,802 1,385 0.143 60 68 8 0.041 33 196 162 0.088 1 63 62 0.032 0 60 60 0.069 124 403 279 0.080 Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? Positive impacts - revenue + profit, Nairobi
Farm profit $US 500 400 300 200 Average = $US 152 100 0 34 15 25 27 11 22 32 13 26 24 35 21 31 36 17 33 37 12 14 16 23 -100 Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? Positive impacts - profits, Kumasi
Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? What are the trade-offs Benefits Costs • HH income • Urban food supply • Nutrient recycling • Managed waste disposal • Chronic ill-health • Wide-scale disease outbreaks • Damage to soils & groundwater Where is the greatest ‘public good’ secured?
Wastewater irrigation - hazard or lifeline? Interim water quality standards • Current WHO guidelines: • Apply to TREATED wastewater • Aim to secure “no measurable excess risk of infection” • Use of UNTREATED wastewater iswidespread. Under these conditions: • “No risk” standard seems unrealistic • A single threshold is unhelpful - all wastewater is not equal • Are there acceptable levels of risk & what do they imply? • Can we provide greater guidance - risk assessment scales? • Can quantitative microbiological risk assessment models provide these answers?