100 likes | 303 Views
The 74th CAA 1992- Introduction. Hailed as Ushering Dawn of Decentralisation or new era of local decentralisationHas roots in recommendations of earlier several committees especially National Commission on Urbanisation (1986)Earlier CAA 67
E N D
1. Implementation of the 74th CAA 1992
2. The 74th CAA 1992- Introduction Hailed as Ushering Dawn of Decentralisation or new era of local decentralisation
Has roots in recommendations of earlier several committees especially National Commission on Urbanisation (1986)
Earlier CAA 67 & 68 were introduced in 1988-89 but got lost
Finally in 1992 parliament adopted them
Came in to effect from April 1993
3. Situation prior to the 74th CAA Various decentralisation initiatives to make ULBs and PRIs institutions of self governance were taken but failed
Two main reasons for their failure
Structure of Indian Constitution – three lists
State governments’ refusal to part with functions, powers, and finances to ULBs & PRIs
Prior to CAA most local government institutions were either routinely superseded or elections were not held timely, resulting in complete subversion of the system of local governance.
4. The 74th Constitutional Amendment Act Visualised ULBs as Institutions of Self-governance with the capability to prepare 'plans for economic development and social justice'.
Introduced unified three tier structure based on population, function and economic base
Put an end to State Government’s discretion to constitute or not to constitute ULB
Representation to women, SC/ST/OBC groups
Introduced 12th Schedule regarding functions which may be transferred to ULBs
5. The 74th Constitutional Amendment Act Democratic Decentralisation: constitution of Ward Committees with representation from women, citizens' groups, SC/ STs etc. in cities with a population of over 0.3 million. For lower level of ULBs, the State Government can decide. To bring governance closer to the people and could be empowered to carry out the responsibilities of the ULB including the XII Schedule
District and Metropolitan Planning Committees: To effect spatial and economic development, and rural and urban planning, with majority representation of elected local representatives.
6. The 74th Constitutional Amendment Act State Finance Commission: To ensure financial stability of ULBs, a State Finance Commission (SFCs) to be constituted every five years. Based upon the recommendations of SFC, the Central Finance Commission to suggest measures for augmenting the consolidated funds in a state, for supplementing the resources of municipalities
State Election Commission: To ensure a democratic process, the act mandates the creation of State Election Commissions (SECs). Another key task of the SECs is to ensure that election to municipalities dissolved by the state government, be held within 6 months of the dissolution.
7. The 74th Constitutional Amendment ActCritical Issues In nut shell what has happened is a political decentralisation
More than 60000 elected representatives assumed role in 15 states but no provision for their training
Political decentralisation is not backed by financial devolution and functional autonomy
The 12th Schedule pertaining to functions is not mandated
State’s absolute power to determine functional and fiscal domain of ULBs remained as it is
8. The 74th Constitutional Amendment Act- Critical Issues No criteria for seat reservation possibility of political victimisation
States have not created ward committees
Those who have created has not given financial powers to these committees or has clubbed several wards to form a single committee
Rotation and short term of Mayor and other functionaries
Delay in SFC constitution and non implementation of their recommendation
Very few States have provided for DPC and MPC
9. Implementation of the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act - Summary Has only ensured existence of ULBs
Political Decentralisation but without empowerment
Only silver lining is there is no reversal of a democratic situation
10. Implementation of the 74th CAA 1992 Thank You