230 likes | 402 Views
ACADEMY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES BUCHAREST DOCTORAL SCHOOL OF FINANCE AND BANKING. INFLATION PERSISTENCE IN NEW EU MEMBER STATES:IS IT DIFFERENT THAN IN THE EURO AREA MEMBERS?. Student: Maria Cristina Popa Supervisor: Professor Moisa Altar. Bucharest July 2008. 3. 3. 3. 3.
E N D
ACADEMY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES BUCHAREST DOCTORAL SCHOOL OF FINANCE AND BANKING INFLATION PERSISTENCE IN NEW EU MEMBER STATES:IS IT DIFFERENT THAN IN THE EURO AREA MEMBERS? Student: Maria Cristina Popa Supervisor: Professor Moisa Altar Bucharest July 2008
3 3 3 3 Objectives for this paper 7 3 5 1 Inflation persistence and its importance 2 Literature Review Conclusions Empirical methodology The model: New Hybrid Phillips Curve Data, Estimations and Results 4 6 Contents
Objectives • To estimate the New Hybrid Phillips Curve for selected new member states (Slovak Republic, Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary and Romania) as a measure of inflation persistence • To compare the results with those available in GGL (2001) for the Euro Area • To compare the nature of Romanian inflation with that reported for other economies
Inflation persistence and its importance (1) • Over the medium to long run - inflation is a monetary phenomenon entirely determined by monetary policy • Over shorter horizons various macroeconomic shocks, including variations in economic activity or production costs, will temporarily move inflation away from the central bank’s inflation objective • Inflation persistence refers to the tendency of inflation to converge slowly towards its long-run value in response to these shocks • Differences in inflation persistence among the current Euro Area Members- raised by different studies starting from 2002.
Inflation persistence and its importance (2) • For the New Member States inflation persistence can influence the fulfillment of the Maastricht criteria, which is an issue before and even after euro adoption • Maastricht criterion on inflation stability says that the NMS must have inflation comparable to the best inflation performers • This inherently implies that in the case of common shocks, the benchmark will be set by countries with a high speed of inflation adjustment
Literature review (1) • Inflation persistence measures are usually based on univariate models (e.g. the sum of autoregressive coefficients, the largest autoregressive root, half-life and spectral density at frequency zero • Gali and Gertler (1999) - The structural estimates describing inflation dynamics based on The New Phillips Curve • Marques (2004) in univariate analysis, the mean of the inflation process is often assumed to be constant • Dossche and Everaert (2005) discuss the role of monetary policy changes for the inflation mean. • Darvas and Varga (2007)- time varying coefficients to measure inflation persistence
Literature review (2) • In contrast to the traditional Phillips curves, the NPC implies purely forward looking inflation dynamics • Extensions to incorporate inflation inertia into the NPC model resulting the New Hybrid Phillips Curve: • Gali and Gertler(GG, 1999) estimated the NHPC for the US • Gali,Gertler and Lopez Salido (GGL, 2001) for the Euro-area • Ribon (2004) – for Israel • Jondeau and Le Bihan (2005) • Benigno and Lopez-Salido (2006) estimated NKPC for five major euro-area countries.
The model: New Hybrid Phillips Curve (1) • New literature on inflation is built on the work of Fischer (1977), Taylor (1980) and Calvo (1983)with focus on the sticky prices and forward-looking behavior framework • Gali et al. (1999) consider a continuous environment of monopolistically competitive firms • Let 1-θ be a random fraction of firms that are going to adjust their price in any given period • A fraction ωuse a backward looking rule of thumb to set their prices • Fraction 1- ωset their price by solving an optimization problem that leads them to consider the expected future behavior of marginal costs ( forward looking firms).
The model: New Hybrid Phillips Curve (2) • Let denote the inflation rate at t, and percent deviation of the firms real marginal cost from its steady state value • There are two approaches where the real marginal cost is replaced by an appropriate proxy variable: • output gap • the real unit labor cost • According to Gali and Gertler’s findings for US, the output gap as a measure of real activity fails yielding usually a negative sign and/or being insignificant.
The model: New Hybrid Phillips Curve (3) • The inflation process for a closed economy can be defined as :
Empirical methodology (1) • Generalized Method of Moments - a feasible method for the estimation and testing of New Phillips Curve in different forms • In particular, under the rational expectation hypothesis, a set of variables is assumed to be perpendicular to current surprise inflation • GMM is a robust estimator in that, unlike maximum likelihood estimation, it does not require the information of the exact distribution of the disturbances.
Empirical methodology (2) • The following orthogonality conditions can be written in order to estimate the model using GMM: • Where Zt is a vector of instrumental variables that must be uncorrelated with εt
Empirical methodology (3) • We use instruments dated t-1 or earlier for two reasons: • First, there is likely to be considerable error in our measure of marginal cost. Assuming this error is uncorrelated with past information, it is appropriate to use lagged instruments. • Second, not all current information may be available to the public at the time they form expectations. • Our vector of instrument variables involves five lags of the GDP deflator, two lags real unit labor costs, two lags of CPI and wage inflation and four lags of the t-bill rate.
Data • Quarterly data are used, covering the main period 1996Q1: 2007Q4. All data are in logarithms. • All time series are quarterly and the data are obtained from Eurostat, International Monetary Fund International Financial Statistics, OECD, and NBR: • infGDP: inflation based in the GDP deflator ; Index number (2000) • infCPI: inflation based on HCPI ;Index number (2005) (Harmonised Consumer Price Index) • winfl: wage inflation (annualized q-o-q change) • rulc : real unit labor cost • tbill: three months t-bill rate
Data • The inflation rate ( πt ) - the annualized quarterly percentage change in the implicit GDP deflator: • ,where is the GDP deflator. • Real unit labor cost (rulc) - deviation of the log of the income share from its average value: • the labor income share = the ratio of total compensation of employees in the economy to nominal GDP.
Results (1) • 1.1 Reduced-form estimates of the NHPC
Results (2) 1.2 Structural estimates of the new hybrid Phillips curve • Two alternative specifications of the orthogonality conditions (for the structural form):
Results (4) • The estimates support the importance of backward looking price setting behavior in as measured by the fraction of backward looking firms, ω • The probability of fixed prices θis lower for the NMS than in the Euro Area
Conclusions • The backward-looking behavior is stronger than forward-looking in most of the NMS • Compared to the Euro area the inflationary process exhibits in the NMS a higher degree of inertia equivalent to a higher degree of inflation persistence • For Romania, we obtain an almost equal proportion of backward and forward looking behavior • Inflation persistence is an important characteristic to look at in the process of euro adoption and the New Hybrid Phillips Curve gives a consistent measure, which should be taken in consideration.