210 likes | 598 Views
Foreign Investment Incentives and Policy Stability: The case of mining royalty laws in Chile and Peru. Jennifer Tobin Brookings Institution and Yale University. Overview.
E N D
Foreign Investment Incentives and Policy Stability:The case of mining royalty laws in Chile and Peru Jennifer Tobin Brookings Institution and Yale University
Overview • How do investment incentives meant to stabilize the short-term policy environment for foreign investors function in the long run?
Outline • Policy Stability: • What is it? • Why do we want it? • How do we get it? • Peru and Chile: Institutional Background • Mining Royalty Laws: • What are they? • What happened? • Why? • Next Steps
Technological Spillovers FDI Range and Complexity of Output Organization and Adaptability of Production Human Development Workforce Capacity Domestic Savings Growth Capital Growth FDI Human Development Household Human Development Spending Household Income Growth Government Policy Preference Government Human Development Government Revenue FDI and Growth
Attracting FDI • Credibility of the investment environment: • macroeconomic stability • political stability • policy stability
Policy Stability Rules of the Game: • Clear • Well known • Well enforced • Stable
Why Stability? Reduces the uncertainty of the future rewards for investing Investment Growth
Stability, but how? • Constitutions • Institutions • Contracts • Time horizons • International agreements
International Legal Guarantees Investor-State Contracts Policy Stability Agreements Investment Incentives
Investment Incentives • Short versus long-term effects
Institutional Environment: Chile • Strong Presidency • Bicameral Legislature • Strong parties • Low corruption • Fiscal discipline • Conservative monetary policy
Institutional Environment: Peru • Strong presidency • Few checks and balances • Party system: Weak and fragmented • Judicial system: Inefficient, corrupt, subject to political manipulation. • Recent macroeconomic stability
FDI: Restrictions/Incentives • DL 600 • Stability Agreements • BITs • FTAs
Mining Royalty Laws • Not a tax • In place in almost all developed countries and more than 120 countries world-wide
Mining Royalty Laws: Chile Pro: Government Public Opinion Concertacion Con: Business and Industry Alianza IMF Rejected
Mining Royalty Laws: Peru Pro: President Public Opinion Most left-parties Con: Finance Minister APRA Business and Industry IMF Passed
Expectations What would we have expected to happen? Just what happened: • Peru: Instability • Chile: Stability
Grand Theoretical Claim • Would they have lost investment? • Did Incentives matter? • Why not collude? • In creating short term stability--created long term policy gridlock