380 likes | 538 Views
Government Bond Market Development – Managing Interdependencies – . June 17, 2003 Johannesburg, South Africa Noritaka Akamatsu Financial Sector Operations & Policy Dept. The World Bank. Why develop Government Bond Market?. Capital markets in general
E N D
Government Bond Market Development – Managing Interdependencies – June 17, 2003 Johannesburg, South Africa Noritaka Akamatsu Financial Sector Operations & Policy Dept. The World Bank
Why develop Government Bond Market? Capital markets in general • complement bank financing and contribute to the development of multi-layered financial systems. • mobilize domestic long-term savings to finance investment for growth without excessively relying on external borrowing. • thus, reduces risks or enable management of those and makes the growth sustainable. Government bond market in particular • is a backbone of fixed-income markets • provides a number of positive externalities for overall debt market development.
Some externalities Macro level: • non-inflationary funding of budget deficit, • smooth transmission of monetary policies Micro level: • support development of the rest of the debt market by offering pricing benchmarks; • stimulate development of financial infrastructure, products, and services; • Enable management of exposure of portfolios to interest rates and exchange rates (derivatives).
The Necessary Environment • Macroeconomic stability, low inflation • Fiscally sustainable growth • Credible commitment of the government • Adequate financial sector development • Liberalization of the financial system, particularly that of interest rate • Competition among intermediaries • Solvent financial system
Recent efforts to foster Government Bond Market The objectives are to: • provide a strategic and comprehensive vision. • emphasize medium- and long-term markets, and • highlight linkages with other markets.
Govt Bond Market as a place of interaction • Govt bond market, like any other financial market, is NOT a single institution but a place of interaction among participants, supported by a complex set of institutions. • Everything depends on everything else, and no single party can dictate the development process. • Requires a political commitment. • An “opportunistic strategy” is needed to manage a complex set of chicken-and-egg problems. Q. Where to start? How to sequence?
Six Building Blocks • The Issuer (i.e., the government) • Investors • Market intermediaries • Trading and settlement infrastructure • Legal and regulatory infrastructure • Instruments
Government as the Issuer- Supply of GSs - • There must be bonds in order for a bond market to exist and develop. The government must: • have a fiscal policy stance which enables sustainable issuance of government bonds, • be adequately empowered to borrow from the domestic market (i.e., borrowing authority), • be capable of managing the borrowing well (together with the central bank), and • be able to manage the cash and debt efficiently. • Fiscal policy should be separated from the monetary policy. • Clear mandates and governance of debt manager.
Public Debt Management and Primary Market • Two key objectives of government debt management • Raise a needed amount of funds when needed, and • Do so price-competitively accounting for risks. • The gov’t should be a price taker (because otherwise, the secondary market will not develop). • Reserve requirement for banks should not be a tool to generate demand for gov’t bonds. • Govt bond market development should be the third objective. • Standardize instruments, regularize and announce issuance calendar, and create benchmarks.
Govt Cash Management and Money Market • Deep and liquid money market and upward sloping yield curve enable trading along the yield curve and encourage demand for long-term govt bonds. • Open market operations by the Central Bank and borrowing operations by the government need to be coordinated. • i.e., requires sound cash and debt management by the government. • Sound management of excess reserves of banks by the Central Bank is required.
Public Debt Management and Primary Dealer System • Obligations for PDs should be designed to be useful for the debt manager to meet debt management objectives. Typical obligations for PDs include: • Always participate in primary auctions; • Market making, i.e., maintaining price quotes for buy and/or sell and a high trading volume through the prices it quotes. • At the same time, benefits for PDs from privileges should outweigh costs from the obligations. Typical privileges include: • Exclusive right to participate in the primary auction • Exclusive counterparties for Central Bank operations • Needs a reliable mechanism to monitor PDs’ market making performance (e.g., trading platform).
Institutional Investors- Source of Demand - • A critical source of demand for long-term govt securities. • Life insurance, pension funds, mutual funds • Mandatory insurance (e.g., auto insurance, mortgage indemnity insurance), second pillar pensions • Investment regulations for pension funds and insurance companies regarding their portfolio allocation should be made conductive to investment in bonds (usually not a problem with govt bonds but often with corporate bonds).
To generate liquidity …… • There need to be investors with different investment / trading needs (e.g., banks, institutional investors, non-financial companies. Individuals?). • Prudential regulation and risk management requirements (including adoption of mark-to-market accounting) should be conductive to generation of liquidity in the market
Prudential Regulation & Risk Management • Institutional investors are typically required to: • invest in liquid and creditworthy instruments • diversify the portfolio, and • mark-to-market the portfolio to manage risk and provide fair market value for the beneficiaries. • Mark-to-market requires: • adoption of proper accounting standards, and • reliable market price information. • Both depends significantly on the existence of liquid secondary market for benchmarks.
Institutional Investors and Trading Market If there are developed institutional investors, • trading market architecture would need to accommodate their business needs. If there aren’t, • banks as dealers would likely be the primary investors as well as intermediaries. • Inter-dealer broker (IDB) or inter-dealer system instead of multi-dealer system is likely to be a trading market architecture.
Bond Market Transparency &Information Systems • Reliability and transparency of market “price” is crucial. • benchmark for pricing in the primary market to ensure smooth absorption. • enables investors to obtain fair value, thus encouraging wider and more active participation in the market • effectuates Mark-to-Market valuation of portfolio and collateral for risk management, mutual funds, etc.. Q. How can a critical mass of transactions be captured to give reliable market price information back to the market? • Information system, trading system or settlement system? • Mandatory reporting of every transaction?
Transparency required Not all transparencies are good. • Post-trade price and volume information for all. • As equal access as possible to “pre-trade price” information at least for all “direct” market participants. • How about identity of market participants? Pre-trade or post-trade?
How to Achieve the Transparency • Organize the trading market to the extent possible. • Standardize pricing formula and other transaction conventions. • Electronic trading systems, IDBs Q. Can electronic market attract critical mass of trading in benchmarks? Fragmentation if multiple platforms? • OTC market - how do we know what the market price is? • Competing private information vendors (e.g., Reuters, Telerate, Bloomberg, Quick, etc.). But fragmentation? • Reporting “requirement” to a central point. To whom? Not a private info vendor. Bond dealers’ association? • Settlement system can gather trade information? • if standardize settlement cycles and shorten it to be Real Time (G-G) DVP. If not???
Transparency and Self-Regulation in Bond Market • Bond dealers’ association can standardize pricing formula and other trading business conventions (e.g., master repo agreement) to enhance transparency and liquidity. • Can self-regulation work in bond market? • Bond dealers’ association: a trade association or an SRO? • Reporting requirement to a bond dealers’ association. Cooperation with private information venders? • Does it have a technical capability?
Electronic Bond Trading • Equity market has been organized in exchanges while bond market has operated OTC. Why? • More recently, the architectures of the two markets are converging with respect to government securities. • Demutualization of stock exchanges and emergence of ATSs and ECNs are making the equity market architecture “open and competitive”. • The possibility of DVP with end-to-end STP with dematerialized securities is making trading of government bonds through a common trading platform more possible. • Electronic trading systems • Inter-dealer system/IDB vs. multi-dealer system
Trading Market • Organized trading may be possible and useful only for benchmarks. Why? • Big players want “anonymity” to avoid impact cost. • Bond Exchange?? NYSE, NASDAQ used?? • Electronic trading systems? • Inter-Dealer Broker (IDB). • There should first be a DVP settlement arrangement. Why?
Trading Market and Institutional Investors • II’s may wish to access the trading platform directly so that they can avoid intermediation cost. • If II’s trade directly among them, dealers (e.g., banks) may lose significant business. • It may be good for the II’s. But it is not entirely clear whether it will be good for market development, because: • banks as dealers may be discouraged to make market, and • viability of a primary dealer system may be reduced.
Efficiency in Settlement • Underpins cost-efficiency of transactions and thus “competitiveness” of the market. • Efficiency-Safety tradeoff • RTGS vs. netting • Capital/liquidity efficiency (i.e., efficient use of capital/ liquidity required to run a settlement system) • Use of collateral instead of capital/liquidity • But the collateral has opportunity cost and must be reasonably liquid • Cross margining / collateralization (e.g., derivatives and spot markets) • DVP first and maybe central counter-party (CCP) later.
Links between Trading and Settlement Systems • An anonymous trading system needs to be supported by DVP settlement because: • each market participant must minimize counter-party risk when there is no CCP; and • the CCP needs to manage counter-party risk vis-à-vis its participants when there is a CCP. • In an emerging market, a CSD was often created as part of a monopoly stock exchange while that for gov’t securities is often operated exclusively by the central bank. Is there room for consolidation? • Straight through processing (STP) • Single entry point • Mark-to-market valuation of collateral
London iX (failed) European Clearing House Clearstream Crest Monte Titoli SCLV Frankfurt Milan Madrid Nasdaq Europe Euroclear Sicovam Necigef CIK Brussels Euronext Amsterdam Paris Tradepoint Virt-X SIS Zurich Oslo Norex VPC Stockholm Copenhagan
Institutional Framework • Institutions can be linked or integrated • Clearing House / Central counterparty (CCP) • Central Securities Depository (CSD) • Custodians • Registrars • The processing should be as straight through (STP) as possible regardless of the combination. • Governance of the body matters in deciding on integration. • CPSS-IOSCO Recommendations for Securities Settlement Systems
Money SettlementRTGS vs. Netting • RTGS or netting (by novation with a CCP) - which is better? • Efficiency-Safety tradeoff: RTGS eliminates systemic risk while requiring liquidity which is often to be provided by the central bank. Netting reduces the liquidity requirement while accumulating systemic risk. • CCP substantially reduces, if not eliminates, a need to assess creditworthiness of the counterparty. • Collateral requirements as functions of trading volume • Shortening of the settlement cycle to reduce systemic risk and market risk. • Settlement cycle is moving toward T+1 • Real time DVP for government securities?
Legal and Regulatory Framework • Debt management law • The borrowing authority and its delegation • Net borrowing limits • (disclosure) • Primary market regulation • Participants of the primary market • Secondary market regulation • Participants of the secondary market • Trading platforms, inter-dealer brokers • Clearance & settlement system (incl. repos, collateral) • Self-regulation
Self-Regulation in Bond Market Would Self-Regulation viable in bond market? • The monopoly organized market. • Good for transparency. But efficient architecture?? Government securities vs corporate bonds • Competitive organized markets • Compete among them and with OTC. I.e., participants can go anywhere if it does not like stringent rules by a market operator. => Hard to enforce rules. • OTC market • Bond dealers’ association: “trade association” or SRO? What is the difference? • Self-regulation by regulation of the Regulatory Authority?
Other Important Tasks • Rationalization of taxation of trading of and investment in debt and equity securities and derivatives (neutral and symmetric capital income taxation). • Standardization of repo transactions (e.g., adoption of BMA-ISMA model of master agreement). • Establishment of derivatives market to provide hedging instruments for dealers and investors. • Legal and regulatory foundations and technical capability for CSD lending and borrowing (with STP-based mark-to-market valuation of collateral). • Government debt management for government securities. • Credit rating for sub-sovereign and corporate bonds including SOE bonds. • Etc., etc..
Lowering of risks and costs Credibility Short-term measures Medium-term measures DEVELOPED MARKET Security Liquidity How should reform plans be prioritized? Depending on each country’s circumstances - size of its economy - Trading volume - sophistication of its financial system - Number of market participants - its investor profile - etc.
Comprehensive Approach Bond Market Committee • to be led by MOF and Central Bank at high level. • to be participated by • securities regulator, • bond market association of trading market operator • settlement system operator, • dealers, • institutional investors and asset managers • To manage this complex set of chicken-and-egg problems. • Political commitment and high level leadership by MOF and Central Bank crucial.
Task Forces • Primary market issuance; • Secondary market trading mechanism and architecture; • Delivery versus payments (DVP) and settlement systems; • Tax, accounting and regulatory impediments; • Market information systems; • Standardization of trading practice and conventions including repo master agreement market • Repo clearing and bond lending; • Dderivatives market; and • Treasury and debt management.
Thank you ! Noritaka Akamatsu