1 / 34

Inaugural Meeting Society for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies Clare College, Cambridge, England. September 22-24,

Pathways of Transition to Adulthood and Early Adult Well-being Jeylan Mortimer, Minzee Kim, Frank Zhang, and Arturo Baiocchi University of Minnesota, US. Inaugural Meeting Society for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies Clare College, Cambridge, England. September 22-24, 2010.

betty_james
Download Presentation

Inaugural Meeting Society for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies Clare College, Cambridge, England. September 22-24,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pathways of Transition to Adulthood and Early Adult Well-beingJeylan Mortimer, Minzee Kim, Frank Zhang, and Arturo Baiocchi University of Minnesota, US Inaugural Meeting Society for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies Clare College, Cambridge, England. September 22-24, 2010

  2. Centrality of Timing in Life Course Analysis • Age-graded roles, expectations, opportunities, constraints & sanctions (Riley, Neugarten) • Off-time transitions produce negative outcomes • Conceptualization of age grading in era of more standardized life course transitions • Consequences of diverse contemporary transitions to adulthood?

  3. Early research focused on timing of single markers, e.g., first job after finishing school • But markers are interlocked, with their meaning dependent on the context in which they occur

  4. Questions motivating this paper • Are diverse pathways to adulthood linked to early adult health outcomes and socioeconomic attainment? • Do differences between pathways persist when background (SES, gender, race) is controlled?

  5. Data Source: Youth Development Study • 1010 youth followed with near-annual surveys from age 14 (1988) to age 35 (2009) • Age 14-17 in-school surveys 18- mail surveys, including Life History Calendars • Approx. 75% retention in recent years

  6. Key measures • Yearly, age 18-30: living with parents school attendance stable FT work, stable other work, unstable work, no work marriage parenting

  7. Health Outcomes, age 31-32, 2005 • Depressed mood index (Ex: During the past month, Have you felt depressed? None of the time…all of the time) • Physical health (In general, would you say your health is Excellent…Poor) • Health Problems Index

  8. Health problems index During the past 4 weeks, • Have physical health problems caused you difficulty in doing your work or other daily activities? (not at all…extremely) • Have emotional problems (such as feeling depressed or anxious) led you to accomplish less than you would like in your work or other daily activities? • Have physical health or emotional problems interfered with your normal social activities with family, friends, neighbors, or groups? • How much physical pain have you had? (none…very severe)

  9. Attainment Outcomes, age 31-32 • College graduation • Bi-weekly wages • Financial strain (stress of financial obligations, difficulty paying bills, burden from debt) • Savings

  10. Transition to Adulthood Latent Life Pathways (LLP’s) • 5 LLP’s identified by Eliason, et al., using multi-level latent class analysis • Person-period specification with repeated measures across ages 17-30 • 732 cases; N=10,248 observations in person-year data set (Likelihood function in Vermunt, 2003; Vermunt & Magidson, 2005; estimated in Latent Gold 4.5)

  11. 3 Three “traditional” school to work pathways – STW in early-mid twenties (1) STWon-time family formation (.17) family formation early-to-mid 20’s (80% married & 60% parents by age 25) Numerous transitions in short period of time (2) STWdelayed family formation (.20) family formation late 20’s (40% married and 10% parents by 25) More time for human capital acquisition before resource depleting parental role (3) STWnegligible family formation (.27) Only 20% married and 10% parents by age 30 Violating family formation age norms?

  12. 2 early parenting pathways Less time for human capital acquisition, high and early resource demands • Early parent, partner, full-time work (.15) Early exit from student role (~age 19); 50% parents by age 18; 90% married by 25; 60% FT work by age 25 • Early parent (.20) Early exit from student role; 60% parents by age 18; little marriage (only 20% married by age 30) and less FT work (<40% by age 25)

  13. Life Path Graph of Most Prominent LLP Traditional School-to-Work Transition, Negligible Family Formation

  14. Marriage

  15. Parenthood

  16. LLP’s linked to subjective pathways • LLP’s differ in sense of being “on time,” and in adult identity in mid-twenties STW on time family formation & Early parents with partners & FT work feel more like an adult than STW Negligible, STW Delayed, and early parents without partners

  17. LLP’s, Gender and Parent College Graduation

  18. Relationships between LLP’s & Health: Depressed Mood

  19. Relationships between LLP’s & Health: Self-evaluated Physical Health

  20. Relationships between LLP’s & Health: Health Problems

  21. LLP’s and Attainment: College Graduation

  22. LLP’s and Attainment: Bi-weekly Wages and Savings

  23. LLP’s and Attainment Outcomes:financial problems

  24. Are there significant relationships between LLP’s and outcomes when social background is controlled?

  25. Regression of Health Outcomes on Background and LLP’sRef. group: Early parents without partners

  26. Logistic regression of college graduation (yes=1) Ref. group: Early parent without partner

  27. OLS regression of bi-weekly wages, savings, and financial problemsRef. group: Early parent without partner

  28. OLS and logistic regression with “Negligible” as reference group

  29. Summary: Health Outcomes Independent of gender, race, and SES: • Youth who follow early parenting pathways are less physically and mentally healthy at age 31-32 than those who follow traditional STW pathways • Youth who follow the Negligible Family Formation LLP have more health problems than those in STW delayed family formation LLP and on time family formation LLP

  30. Summary: Economic Well-being Independent of social background: • STW transition pathways: Greater likelihood of college graduation • Delayed family formation pathway: • More wages, more savings, less financial strain than early parenting pathway • More college graduation, wages and savings than STW negligible family formation pathway

  31. Conclusion: Pathways matter • Despite changes in the transition to adulthood and possible erosion of age norm consensus, the timing of transition markers matters for early adult health and economic well-being • Delayed parenting especially beneficial---more time to accrue human capital before resource-depleting parental role • Early parenting as well as negligible family formation problematic

  32. Future research • What might explain LLP’s relative advantages? • Selection to LLP’s based on psychological resources? Self-efficacy, especially in economic domain High educational and occupational aspirations

  33. Future research • Experiences during the transition to adulthood? Supports from parents (emotional, co-residence, financial) Acute stressors: negative life events

  34. Thank you for your attention. Questions? Comments?

More Related