200 likes | 231 Views
SAPS Anti-Corruption Strategy. Overview to the portfolio committee on police – 13 September 2011. Presentation Contents. The Minimum Anti-Corruption Capacity Requirements (MACC) The process for the development of the SAPS Anti-Corruption Strategy (ACS) The aim of the four pillars of the ACS
E N D
SAPS Anti-Corruption Strategy Overview to the portfolio committee on police – 13 September 2011
Presentation Contents • The Minimum Anti-Corruption Capacity Requirements (MACC) • The process for the development of the SAPS Anti-Corruption Strategy (ACS) • The aim of the four pillars of the ACS • Overview of the four pillars: priorities, objectives, current and planned implementation • The Prevention Pillar • The Detection Pillar • The Investigation Pillar • The Resolution Pillar • Way Forward.
The Minimum anti-corruption capacity requirements (macc) • Cabinet decided in September 2003 to require all public service departments and entities to have a specific ‘minimum level of anti-corruption capacity’ within their departments.
the process for the development of the SAPS ACS • DPSA Minimum Anti-corruption Requirements (MACC) Audit • SAPS was assessed as being 69% compliant with the MACC, in 7th position overall of 27 national departments involved in the audit • An internal national workshop was conducted to consult / develop the strategy • Consultation and sensitization processes are underway • The development and refinement of the elements of the ACS, within the 4 pillars • The ACS will be approved by the SAPS National Management Forum by the end of September 2011.
the prevention pillar • Prevention Pillar Priority 1 – To develop and implement an Integrity Management Framework for the SAPS • Objective 1 - To establish an effective Ethics and Integrity Management capacity within the SAPS • Objective 2 – To ensure managerial assistance to members in the prevention of corruption and fraud to empower them with the skills and knowledge required to avoid unethical, unprofessional and corrupt and fraudulent conduct • Objective 3: To identify, assess and manage the risks related to unethical, unprofessional and criminal (as well as corrupt and fraudulent) conduct by SAPS members • Objective 4: To manage the SAPS’ corruption prevention policies and procedures • Objective 5: To support the strategy through the conducting of research.
the prevention pillar cont… • Prevention Pillar Priority 2 – Communicating the ACS • Objective 1 - Launch the “Look Out” Campaign to create awareness among members on the 9th of December 2011 to focus on: • Explanation of the definition of corruption and fraud • Causes and consequences of corruption and fraud within the SAPS • How and where corruption and fraud involving SAPS members can be reported, including the promoting of whistleblowing, the Presidential Hotline and the National Anti-corruption Hotline • Popularizing the SAPS Gifts Policy and Register through internal communication tools • Recognition of good work done by members • Publicly demonstrating the commitment of the SAPS to clean and effective governance • Objective 2 - External communication of corruption awareness and reporting with existing and new community-based partners (e.g. Shout, Primedia, CPFs, BACSA).
the prevention pillar cont… • Priority 3 – To monitor and evaluate the ACS • Objective 1 - Monitoring and Evaluating the implementation of the ACS. • Annual assessment of ACS compliance with the MACC • Benchmarking of the ACS • Specific performance indicators will be included • The number of SAPS members arrested and charged criminally • The number of guilty and not-guilty verdicts • The court-ready case docket rate for corruption and corruption-related offences • The number of SAPS members charged departmentally • Conducting annual impact evaluation studies on ACS implementation.
Current implementation – prevention pillar • Corruption and fraud by SAPS members prioritized as a strategic risk • National Risk Committee manages the development and implementation process • Public statements by the Minister, Deputy Minister and the National Management on the zero tolerance approach to corrupt SAPS members • Ethics officers designated at national and provincial levels • Anti-corruption Communication Plan in place • Communiqués with members regarding the consequences of corruption and the need to maintain professional conduct • Sensitization of members initiated on 1 January 2011 • 37 387 (19,2%) members sensitized at all levels • Recruitment process strengthened to improve quality of entry level members • Community involvement in selection process • Vetting of applicants • Existing anti-corruption skills development modules offered: • The 2011 entry level members trained on the new sensitization module • Employee Health and Wellness work ethics and anti-corruption module • Integrity Testing Model currently being developed • Customized Employee Health and Wellness support programmes implemented • Consultation with all levels on the further development of the Prevention Pillar, including the Integrity Management Framework.
Planned implementation – prevention pillar • Implementation of corruption prevention policies subsequent to the approval of the ACS • Planned launch of the Anti-corruption Strategy on International Anti-corruption Day on 9 December 2011 • Ethics and Integrity Indaba planned to be held by March 2012 • Finalize formal anti-corruption skills development courses for all levels • Conduct research regarding public perceptions of corruption and impact evaluations • Establishing a Centre for Service Excellence within the SAPS to: • coordinate reports of unprofessional service delivery; and • commendations for good service delivery.
the detection pillar • Priority 1 – Management of reports and allegations of corruption and fraud submitted to the SAPS • Objective 1- Ensure the development of a Centralized Management Information System • Objective 2 – Ensure periodic reporting to the DPSA in line with the MACC • Priority 2 - Develop an integrated approach to detecting corruption within the SAPS • Objective 1 – To determine corruption-prone areas and identify trends for targeted intervention • Objective 2 – Ensure an integrated detection approach by Crime Intelligence, the Inspectorate and Internal Audit.
Current implementation – Detection pillar • Risk-based audits and inspections by the Internal Audit Component and Inspectorate respectively • Corruption and fraud risk assessments conducted by divisions and provinces • Manage reports of corruption and fraud received from the Presidential Hotline and the National Anti-corruption Hotline • The management of complaints of unprofessional conduct by SAPS members from the Ministry, Secretary of Police, the ICD and those reported to the Inspectorate • Profiling and vetting of members by Crime Intelligence and the DPCI.
planned implementation – Detection pillar • Updating current information systems to allow for ease of reporting corruption and fraud • The analysis of current data to determine trends to support the detection of corruption and fraud • The conducting of lifestyle audits focusing on corruption and fraud.
the investigation pillar • Priority 1 –Directorate for Priority Crimes Investigation • Objective 1 – Ensure the effective investigation of criminal charges with an organised or commercial crime dimension • Objective 2 - Ensure the effective investigation of criminal charges with the focus on members of departments in the JCPS Cluster • Priority 2 –Detective Services • Objective 1 - Ensure the effective investigation of other criminal charges of corruption and fraud • Priority 3 – Managing investigations into corruption and fraud • Objective 1 - Improve the court-ready case docket and detection rate • Priority 4 –Cooperation with other government departments • Objective 1 - Improve the court-ready case docket and detection rate in cooperation with other government departments (court process), e.g. NPA, SARS.
Current implementation – investigation pillar • Investigation by SAPS of registered charges against SAPS members • Detective Services • DPCI • Investigation of disciplinary cases • Prioritizing the investigation of corruption and fraud within the JCPS Cluster (including SAPS) • The management of outstanding criminal charges of corruption and fraud against SAPS members • The conducting of a feasibility study into the re-establishment of internal anti-corruption units has been approved.
the resolution pillar • Priority 1 – Effective management of disciplinary cases • Objective 1 - Finalize internally generated and IPID referred departmental / disciplinary cases against members for corruption and fraud within set timeframes • Priority 2 - Improving Internal Controls • Objective 1 - Review SAPS policies and procedures compromised by corruption or fraud • Priority 3 – Recovery of losses • Objective 1 - Effective application of SAPS Loss Management policy to ensure recovery of losses as result of corruption.
Current implementation – resolution pillar • Disciplinary trial structures and units approved and implemented • 479 departmental charges / disciplinary cases against SAPS members were recorded in 2010/11 • Existing system to recover losses incurred by the SAPS as a result of corruption and fraud by SAPS members.
planned implementation – resolution pillar • Enhancement of the Loss Management System to specify recoveries for losses as a result of corruption and fraud by SAPS members • Improving systems and controls compromised by corruption and fraud.
Way forward • The finalizing and approval of the ACS by the National Management Forum • Develop an implementation plan for the phased implementation of the Strategy • Monitoring and evaluation of the implementation and the impact of the Strategy • Focus on achieving of objectives and targets in in line with performance indicators.