330 likes | 663 Views
Inside the Copenhagen Climate Negotiations: The Critical Roles of the U.S. and China Mark D. Levine, PhD. Leader, China Energy Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. China Energy Group at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab 劳伦斯伯克利国家实验室 中国能源研究室 Established 1988 成立于 1988 年
E N D
Inside the Copenhagen Climate Negotiations:The Critical Roles of the U.S. and ChinaMark D. Levine, PhD Leader, China Energy Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
China Energy Group at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab 劳伦斯伯克利国家实验室 中国能源研究室 • Established 1988 成立于1988年 • Unique in the world 有独特的优势 • Mission: China Energy Group works collaboratively with groups in China and elsewhere to: 宗旨:通过与中国和其他地区的机构的合作来: -- enhance the capabilities of Chinese institutions that promote energy efficiency and 加强中国促进能效的机构的能力建设 -- understand the dynamics of energy use in China. 了解中国能源使用的动态
Key Successes 主要成就 • Driving force for Chinese adoption of appliance energy efficiency standards 中国采用家电能效标准的主要推动力 • Performed pilot project of industry efficiency agreements as a forerunner to China’s national industrial energy efficiency policy 作为先行者开展工业能效协议试点项目 • Created two institutions that are leaders in energy efficiency policy: the Energy Foundation China Sustainable Energy Program (in SF) and the Beijing Energy Conservation Center (in Beijing) 建立了两个能效政策的领导性机构:能源基金会中国可持续能源项目(在旧金山)和北京能源效率中心(北京) • Trained more than 300 Chinese in various aspects of energy efficiency 在能效的各方面国内培训人员超过300人
The key parties to the negotiation:1. United States2. China3. European Union4. Developing World
Two parties will set the tone:U.S. and ChinaE. U. and developing countries will be very active in discussions but will follow the lead of the U.S. and China.China has committed to a 40-45% reduction in its CO2 emission intensity relative to 2005 intensity levels.The U.S. cannot make an official commitment, because this will require Congressional action. But President Obama can and will state his position on greenhouse gas limits.As a consequence, Copenhagen is likely to serve as a basis for official decisions that will take place on or before the 2010 meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP) in Mexico.
Question: what is the significance of the 40%-45% reduction in CO2 emissions intensity in China?Note: CO2 emissions intensity – CO2/unit gross domestic product (GDP)
China’s Energy & Economic Growth 1980 = 100 GDP 国内生产总值 Energy 能源消费 Source: China Energy Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
However, from 2003-2005, energy intensity increasedfor the first time since 1980 with very significant consequences
Annual CO2 Emissions: US & China million tons carbon dioxide US China Source: US annual emissions amounts reported by US EIA in the 2006 Annual Energy Review and 2007 Flash Estimate; China emissions are derived from revised total energy consumption data published in the 2007 China Statistical Yearbook using revised 1996 IPCC carbon emission coefficients by LBNL
Global, Chinese & U.S. Per-Capita Energy-Related CO2 Emissions – 1950-2004 tons CO2/person US美国 Global Average全球平均 China中国 Source: China emissions are derived from revised total energy consumption data published in the 2007 China Statistical Yearbook using revised 1996 IPCC carbon emission coefficients by LBNL; China population data from NBS and US Census (for 1950-51); global and American emissions data from Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center; global and American population data from US Census
Recent newspaper articles state that China’s commitment to reduce CO2 emissions intensity by 40% to 45% by 2020 is of little significance. • I respectively disagree.
Judged by the standards of all other developing countries, China’s commitment is very significant • Achieving the goal of 40-45% reduction in CO2 by 2020 will require very significant policies for China to contain the economic forces that are driving energy demand
Restraining these forces will require continued application of very stringent policies • Tougher efficiency standards—for appliances andfor motor vehicles--than those in the U.S. • More low or zero carbon energy sources per capita than any country except France or a hydropower-rich nation • Greater investment in wind, photovoltaics, nuclearpower than any country (even on a per capita basis) • Among the highest energy prices in the developing world • Most importantly, If the developing world were able to achieve China’s target, projected global CO2 emissions would be cut by 50 to 75%world were able to follow China’s example (40-45% intensity reduction for 2020), then global emissions growth through 2020 would be cut by more than 50% from projected!
It is a common belief that China’s CO2 emissions will continue to grow throughout this century and will dominate the world’s emissions. We believe this is not likely to be the case because: • Appliances, floor area, vehicles, roadways, etc. will saturate some time between 2020 and 2030 • When this happens, China will have (on a total and per capita basis) larger low or zero CO2 emissions energy supply system than the United Statest United States by a considerable margin
Unless the Chinese develop a profligate lifestyle—modeling themselves on a certain country in North America—China will have leveled off in its CO2 emissions at a much lower per capita level than the United States, Europe, or Japan!!
MythsNot used in presentation; included in case there are questions that can best be answered by a power point.
My topic concerns the myths – often pernicious – surrounding China’s energy demand, supply, prices and associated CO2 emissions 我的主题是关于关于中国能源需求、供给、价格和相关二氧化碳排放的迷思,这些迷思通常是有害无益的
Myth: China has paid little attention to energy efficiency, preferring to build countless coal-fired power plants instead迷思:
China’s Energy & Economic Growth中国的能源消费与经济增长 1980 = 100 GDP 国内生产总值 Energy 能源消费 Source: China Energy Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 数据来源:劳伦斯-伯克利国家实验室,中国能源与环境研究室
Industrial Energy Intensities are Declining工业能源强度正在下降 千克标准煤/2000年人民币元 2.0 Smelting & rolling of ferrous metals 金属冶炼及压延加工 1.8 1.6 Petroleum refining & coke production 1.4 Non-metal mineral products 非金属矿物制品 1.2 Chemicals化工 1.0 Non-ferrous metals mining and casting kgce/RMB (2000) 0.8 Paper造纸 0.6 Coal mining Electricity production电力 0.4 Textiles纺织 0.2 0 Source: China Energy Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 资料来源:劳伦斯-伯克利国家实验室,中国能源与环境研究室
Improving energy efficiency in industry is crucial because industry is 70% of total energy demand
Note: comparisons of CO2emissions are on a per capita basis This is the only measure that makes sense. Would you compare Monaco and the United States based on total CO2 emissions, or on per capita emissions?
Myth: China, because of its enormous coal use, has emitted more CO2 than any other nation
Global, Chinese & U.S. Per-Capita Energy-Related CO2 Emissions – 1950-20041950-2004年全球、中国和美国的人均能源相关二氧化碳排放量 吨二氧化碳/人 US美国 tons CO2/person Global Average全球平均 China中国
Myth: China’s per capita coal consumption is the highest in the world
Per Capita Coal Consumption, Various Countries 不同国家的人均煤炭消耗 人均煤炭消耗(吨石油当量/每人)
Myth: China’s vast coal reserves, which it is bound to use, will swamp any effort to tackle global climate
Per Capita Coal Reserves, Various Countries 不同国家的人均煤炭数量
Global Oil Supply (blue), Traded oil (light blue), Chinese oil consumption (red), Chinese oil imports (yellow) 世界石油供给(蓝色),石油贸易(浅蓝色),中国石油消耗(红色),中国石油进口(黄色)