1 / 11

Assessment at Southampton

Assessment at Southampton. Presentation of Gradebook and E-assignment. Liv Støbseth-Brown 03 August 2011 . AAS - Governance. Business and Law - Jenny Atkins, Tim Metcalf, Gill Sivyour, Engineering & Environment - Catherine Hann, Ian Williams

bevis
Download Presentation

Assessment at Southampton

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessment at Southampton Presentation of Gradebook and E-assignment Liv Støbseth-Brown 03 August 2011

  2. AAS - Governance

  3. Business and Law - Jenny Atkins, Tim Metcalf, Gill Sivyour, Engineering & Environment - Catherine Hann, Ian Williams Health Sciences -Claire Atkins, Rosalynd Jowett Humanities - Lynn Godfrey Medicine - Susan Ponsford, Sally Skidmore, Sally Rushworth Natural and Environmental - Jeremy Hinks, Mandy Pervin Physical & Applied Science - Andy Gravell, Dain Mead Social & Human - Aiden Gregg, Peter Smith AAS : Faculty Representation on POB

  4. E-assignment

  5. Proposed Institutional System

  6. Features Multiple documents can be submitted Documents types specified (Word, PDF, Excel, SPSS…….) Virus Checking Academic Integrity declaration and Checks (TurnitIn) Specify dates for: Start & End of submission period Extension Completion of Marking Release of Marks

  7. Features continued Percentages or Graded Criteria (converted to percentages) Makers can upload documents for student Export of Marks and submitted work Roles: Administrator, Marker, Moderator, External Examiner Marking approaches: Single, Double, Blind, 1st marker then 2nd marker Notification of Penalties

  8. Benefits • For Students • access to all assignment criteria and marking descriptors • consistency of submission, marking and feedback, 24/7 • For Markers • access to assignments online (?no physical copies) • very similar to peer reviewing • For Quality Assurance • transparency of assignment criteria and marking descriptors • consistent process of marking & easy access for externals

  9. Benefits • For the Institution • Efficiency of administrative processes, faster turn rounds • Harmonisation of assessment processes across the Institution • Quality Enhancement • Analysis of assessment at the criteria level • Performance feedback to markers leading to improved marker commitment

  10. Eassignment Links • Humanities Student example • http://www.jisc-ea.soton.ac.uk/resources/studentsubmission/humanitiesexample/ http://www.jisc-ea.soton.ac.uk/resources/administration/initialassignmentcreation3/initialassignmentcreation3.htm

More Related