140 likes | 162 Views
Explore the evaluation process, budget allocation, and outcomes of ICT research in the 7th EU Framework Programme. Discuss key areas such as health, mobility, digital libraries, and more. Evaluation criteria and panel organization are also highlighted.
E N D
AEA Conference OrlandoEvaluating ICT Research in the 7th EU Framework ProgrammeMartin Übelhör, European CommissionNovember 12, 2009
Overview ICT Research in FP7 Timing Evaluation questions Organisation of work Panel members Evidence base
ICT Research in FP7 systems addressing socio-economic goals 5. ICT for health 6. ICT for mobility & sustainable growth 7. ICT for independent living, inclusion and governance 4. Digital libraries & content +AAL ~10% ~9% ~8% ~4% 1. Network and service infrastructures ~30% 2. Cognitive systems, interaction, robotics technology roadblocks Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) ~10% 3. Components, systems, engineering ~20% ~9% +JTIS ••• 5
Timing FP7 ex-post 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 FP7 interim FP6 ex-post FP8 ex-ante? FP6 FP7 FP8
Evaluation questions I • Quality of research • Progress towards objectives • Quality of implementation; simplification
Evaluation questions II • Quality: • Concentration of effort? Flexibility? • Best researchers in Europe? Worldwide?
Evaluation questions III • Objectives (selected) • Global research map? • ERA? • Innovation? • Knowledge triangle? • EU policy goals?
Evaluation questions IV • Implementation and simplification (selected) • Work Programme formulation? • Mix of instruments? • Changes in implementation adequate? • Budgetary impact of Rules of Participation? • Trust-based relationship?
Evidence base • Work Programmes, Communications etc. • Commission self-assessment • Proposal and call evaluation data • Contract management data • Projects data • Surveys, case studies • Benchmarking, external data and indicators
Organisation of work • Panel • Seven members • Approx. seven meetings (one day) • Support team of consultants (Technopolis Ltd.) • Analysis and evaluation method • Drafting • Commission