1 / 14

G M p Simulation and analysis plan

G M p Simulation and analysis plan. E. Christy (Hampton University), John Arrington (ANL). → Analysis framework based on procedures well tested for precision Cross section measurements, eg. - M.E. Christy, et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 015206 (2004).

bgrammer
Download Presentation

G M p Simulation and analysis plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GMp Simulation and analysis plan E. Christy (Hampton University), John Arrington (ANL) → Analysis framework based on procedures well tested for precision Cross section measurements, eg. - M.E. Christy, et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 015206 (2004). - A Qattan, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 142301 (2005). → Simulation software also already exists, with multiple tools available

  2. Ideally have at least 2 (mostly) independent analyses utilizing: 1. complementary procedures 2. independent software when feasible

  3. Cross Section Extraction Methods For each bin in DE', DW, the number of detected electrons is: N- = L*(ds/dWdE')*(DE' DW)*e*A(E',q) + BG with L: Integrated Luminosity (# of beam electrons*targets/area) e: Total efficiency for detection A(E',q): Acceptance for bin BG: Background events. The efficiency and backgroun corrected electron yield is Y = (N- - BG)/e = L*s data *(DE DW)*A(E',q)

  4. For A(E',q) accurately modeled by simulation, determine cross section from 1. s data = Y/[(DE DW)*A(E',q)*L] (acceptance correction method) or 2. sdata = smod * [Y(E',q)/YMC(E',q)](MC ratio method) M.E. Christy, et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 015206 (2004). To get Born cross section: 1. radiatively correct data 2. radiated model

  5. Acceptance correction method (single arm MC uniform generation) Apply background subtractions and acceptance corrections in each E'-q bin. Integrate radiative tail in each q bin. Apply radiative corrections (code from SLAC NE11, modified for current target). Use Model to remove q dependence. Do Weighted average over q.

  6. E94-110 – acceptance correction E99-118 – SIMC ratio Data – cryo Data – scaled dummy Yield Data - endcap subtracted MC ratio method: SIMC

  7. Summary → Methods are complementary and each has advantages and disadvantages → Both rely on reliable model of spectrometer optics and acceptance → Different radiative correction codes for each method => Provide robust cross check of results

  8. Backup

  9. HMS Momentum 2.75 GeV 2.36 GeV 2.0 GeV 1.75 GeV Acceptance Correction Method • Bin efficiency corrected e- yield indp/p- q.(dp/p = +/- 8%, Dq= +/- 35 mrad) • Subtract scaled dummy yield bin-by-bin to remove e- Al background. • Subtract charge symmetric e- yield bin-by-bin. • Apply acceptance correction for each d-q bin. • Apply radiative corrections bin-by-bin. • Apply q bin-centering correction and average over q => for each d bin.

  10. Monte Carlo Ratio Method Generate MC events with s model weighting and radiative contributions included. Scale the MC yield by L data/LMC , where LMC is that needed to produce Ngen for the given smod and phase space generated into. Add background contributions to MC or subtract from data. ds (d, qc) = dsmod(d,qc) * Y(d)/YMC(d) Where Y(d) is the yield for events with any value of q, i.e. this integrates over q. Warning: For inclusive data, radiative events can come from kinematically far away. Comparison of January '05 proton data to MC using E94-110 resonance region model and externally calculated radiative corrections.

  11. For comparison of SIMC and MCEEP radiative effects see http://hallaweb.jlab.org/data_reduc/AnaWork2010/mkj_simc_mceep_radcor.pdf

More Related