1 / 51

Summary of FY 2012 Review FY13 changes Plan for FY14

Summary of FY 2012 Review FY13 changes Plan for FY14. Sage Grouse Initiative FY12. Ag. Water Enhancement FY12. Coop. Conservation Partnership FY12. National Water Quality Initiative FY12. FY13 Initiatives. Initiatives. FY12 CAPS. No changes to CAPs. FY13 TA in Producer Contracts.

bikita
Download Presentation

Summary of FY 2012 Review FY13 changes Plan for FY14

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Summary of FY 2012 Review FY13 changes Plan for FY14

  2. Sage Grouse Initiative FY12

  3. Ag. Water Enhancement FY12

  4. Coop. Conservation Partnership FY12

  5. National Water Quality Initiative FY12

  6. FY13 Initiatives

  7. Initiatives

  8. FY12 CAPS

  9. No changes to CAPs

  10. FY13 TA in Producer Contracts

  11. FY 13 Tribal Pools changes • Range 30% • Cropland 15% • Pasture 10% • Forestry 35% • Other land 10%

  12. 5% Beginning Farmer Pools FY13

  13. 5% Socially Disadvantaged Pools FY13

  14. Other SD and BF options approved by NHQ • One statewide pool for SD 5% • One statewide pool for BF 5% • Ranking Questions that apply to all landuses? • Other options?

  15. FY13 Screening tool for LWGs and State Initiatives • HIGH Will application clearly treat one of the top 10 priority concerns within priority area on SRA • MED Will application clearly treat one of the top 10 priority concerns outside of priority area • LOW Application is eligible, but doesn’t treat one of the top 10 resource concerns.

  16. Screening tools for FY14 • Discussion • LWG specific? • Example; existing conservation plan

  17. RANKING TOOLS Cost efficiency score National questions 250 pts. 25% State Questions: 100 points Local Questions: 650 points

  18. FY13 State Question Changes: • Contract length 5 to 3 years or less • Points for an existing RMS plan • Remove SD, and BF question • LWGs still assign points • Add proximity to Tribal land question and treating Tribal resource concern question

  19. Do the practices treat a tribal resource concern? • Are the practices on land adjacent to tribal lands, or in a shared watershed? If so, are the practices compatible with activities on the tribal lands?

  20. LWG Reports

  21. Northwest Team FY12

  22. Northwest Team FY13

  23. Puget Sound Team FY12

  24. Puget Sound Team FY13

  25. South West Team FY12

  26. South West Team FY13

  27. Puget Sound Salmon Recovery FY12

  28. Puget Sound Salmon Recovery

  29. North Central Team FY12

  30. North Central Team FY13

  31. Big Bend Team FY12

  32. Big Bend Team FY13

  33. South Central Team FY12

  34. South Central Team FY13

  35. North East Team FY12

  36. North East Team FY13

  37. Palouse Team FY12

  38. Palouse Team FY13

  39. West Palouse Team FY12

  40. West Palouse Team FY13

  41. Snake River Team FY12

  42. Snake River Team FY13

  43. TIMELINES

  44. FY14 • LWG Kickoff Jan. 22nd Wenatchee

More Related