190 likes | 385 Views
Capturing information on remittances and other flows – a fact-finding in Europe. Violetta Damia. International Technical Meeting on Measuring Migrant Remittances. 24 - 25 January 2005. Overview. General considerations Definitions (BPM5) Fact-finding exercise
E N D
Capturing information on remittances and other flows – a fact-finding in Europe Violetta Damia International Technical Meeting on Measuring Migrant Remittances 24 - 25 January 2005
Overview • General considerations • Definitions (BPM5) • Fact-finding exercise • Results – Methodological issues • Results – Magnitude of flows • Main conclusions • Questions?
General considerations Workers’ remittances: • 2nd largest source of external finance for developing countries • size relevant to GDP vs. low volatility shown • conceptual framework given by IMF BoP Manual (5th edition)
Overview • General considerations • Definitions (BPM5) • Fact-finding exercise • Results – Methodological issues • Results – Magnitude of flows • Main conclusions • Questions?
Definitions (BPM5) Compensation of employees:the earnings of border, seasonal, and other workers paid by an employer resident in one economy to employees resident in other economies paid in kind and/or in cash recordedunder current account / income Workers’ remittances:the remittances of funds to families abroad by residents (living in the host economy for 12 months or more) recorded undercurrent account / current transfers Migrants’ transfers:the net worth of migrants at the time of migration (cash and goods transferred) – recorded undercapital account / capital transfers
Overview • General considerations • Definitions (BPM5) • Fact-finding exercise • Results – Methodological issues • Results – Magnitude of flows • Main conclusions • Questions?
Fact-finding exercise (WG-ES) EU Member States were requested to send available information on • Compensation of employees, • Workers remittances, and • Migrant transfers with the objective to assess the magnitude of flows at the European level • data and metadata • if available, with geographical allocation
Overview • General considerations • Definitions (BPM5) • Fact-finding exercise • Results – Methodological issues • Results – Magnitude of flows • Main conclusions • Questions?
Results: Meth. Issues (1) Compensation of employees: The information reported is • partly collected by settlement systems, tax and social security systems and the resident credit institutions • partly estimated based on the previous years, number of foreign workers, average wages, social contributions and census
Results: Meth. Issues (2) Compensation of employees: Main caveats: • high thresholds • diversity of methods to transfer money • 1-year-rule : difficult to apply in practice difficulty to differentiate between compensation of employees and workers’ remittances
Results: Meth. Issues (3) Workers’ remittances: The information reported is • mainly collected by settlement systems, by banks and post offices, through household surveys, from foreign exchange reports • difficult to estimate
Results: Meth. Issues (4) Workers’ remittances: Main caveats: • high thresholds • diversity of methods of money transfers • the presence of illegal foreign workers • 1-year-rule : difficult to apply in practice
Results: Meth. Issues (5) Migrant transfers: The most difficult to measure • difficulty for most countries to monitor the flows separately hence migrants transfers are recorded under workers’ remittances • the estimations are based on number of migrants and the average assets transferred
Overview • General considerations • Definitions (BPM5) • Fact-finding exercise • Results – Methodological issues • Results – Magnitude of flows • Main conclusions • Questions?
Results: Magnitude of flows (2) Compensation of employees: • mainly EU25: temporal, seasonal and border workers • American continent (especially the debit side) Workers’ remittances: • mainly EU25 • debit side: balanced distribution worldwide Migrant transfers: • even distribution of low level flows: underestimation?
Overview • General considerations • Definitions (BPM5) • Fact-finding exercise • Results – Methodological issues • Results – Magnitude of flows • Main conclusions • Questions?
Main conclusions • need to fill the recording gaps so as to have a more concrete measurement • review thresholds applied • importance to follow harmonised methods to ensure comparability (based on BPM5) • further improvement of BPM5 in terms of definitions • encouragement for the utilisation of formal channels by reducing transfers’ costs • increase quality of information (underestimations) • development of estimation methods for capturing reality (e.g. refinement of households surveys)