https://www.viralsupplement.com/

1. Viral Supplement HCA, while others took a placebo. At the end of the 12-week period, the HCA group had not exhibited a statistically significant difference in terms of percent body fat loss or weight loss. Some thought that this would be the end of HCA as a dietary supplement. However, other studies have yielded conflicting results. Reviews of this study One of the main criticisms of this study comes from Harry Preuss, a researcher at Georgetown University, who claims that the JAMA study "had used the dose available at that time, and the type of citrate they used was never mentioned." In other words, the HCA used may not have been adequate. In addition, others have criticized this study for the intensive use of dietary fiber. Dietary fiber is thought to interfere with HCA, which could inhibit weight loss in the group that took HCA. 2003: One study shows that "no effect on body weight" In 2003, Japanese researchers published a study in Phytotherapy. This study examined the effects of Viral Supplement extract on mice over a 4-week period. The research concluded by stating: "It was found to have no effect on body weight, abdominal fat weight, or serum glucose level." Viral Supplement However, Viral Supplement has been shown to have other physiological effects. The treated mice showed, for example, lower levels of insulin and leptin (hormone associated with appetite suppression) in serum, as well as a lower ratio of leptin / WAT (adipose white Tissue). This led the researchers to conclude that "the extract of G. Cambogia efficiently improved glucose metabolism and showed leptin activity." 2004: One study shows that HCA led to a loss of 12 pounds of weight for 8 weeks as well as a 6.3% reduction in BMI (body mass index) Dr. Preuss, the guy who simply initially denied the effects of Garcinia. https://www.viralsupplement.com/