1 / 46

August 2010

Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan. August 2010. Polk Transportation Planning Organization. Topics Introduction Project Prioritization Transit Highways Non-Motorized Facilities Financial Resources Draft Cost Feasible Plan. Introduction

binh
Download Presentation

August 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Polk Transportation Planning Organization 2035 Mobility Vision Plan August 2010 Polk Transportation Planning Organization

  2. Topics • Introduction • Project Prioritization • Transit • Highways • Non-Motorized Facilities • Financial Resources • Draft Cost Feasible Plan

  3. Introduction • The Draft Cost Feasible Plan is a financially constrained version of the 2035 Needs Plan based on available revenue (federal, state & local) through the year 2035. • The Draft Cost Feasible Plan contains the most important projects (priorities) indentified in the Needs Plan. • These projects are the source for the TPO’s future priority projects.

  4. Introduction • Staff is requesting the Board to review and approve the 2035 Draft Cost Feasible Plan. • Public Review and Comment Period • August 12th through December 9th. • 2035 MVP Public Hearing and Final Adoption is scheduled for December 9th.

  5. Transit Prioritization

  6. Eight Scoring Criteria: • Previous Plans (2060 Plan, PTA Expansion) • Regional Connectivity and Accessibility (Transit Centers/Park and Ride Lots) • Transit Potential • Urban Form and Planned Growth • Public Input Transit Evaluation Criteria & Scoring

  7. Additional Considerations • PTA Plan represents first five years of cost affordable transit improvements • Subsequent phasing will be based on project ranking with the following considerations emphasized: • Anticipated route productivity (ridership) • Available projected revenues • Public input • Timing of growth – implement improvements in growth areas concurrent with anticipated development

  8. Highway Prioritization

  9. Yellow indicates Change Since March

  10. State Intermodal System (SIS) Cost-Feasible Projects in Polk County Source: SIS Long Range Capacity Plan (Approved 2009)

  11. Highway Project Prioritization – Non-SIS Roads • Based on Approved 2035 Goals & Objectives • Multi-Modal System Development • Environmental Sustainability • Regional Support • Freight & Goods Movement • Efficiency & Interconnectivity • Safety & Security • Public Input

  12. Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d) • Candidate projects evaluated by whether they would: • Complete or fill gap(s) in system • Connect directly to desired destinations or facilities • Lie within specific designated areas • Address problems or enhance designated facilities • Satisfy need(s) expressed by public

  13. Non-motorized Transportation

  14. Non-motorized Facilities • Top 100 Projects identified for: • Bicycle Improvements – typically done as part of road projects • Sidewalk Improvements – done as part of road projects or stand-alone enhancements • Multi-Use Trail Projects • Typically done as funding & opportunities arise

  15. Financial Resources

  16. Total Funding = $2,109 M (YOE) DRAFT

  17. DRAFT

  18. Central Polk Parkway • PD& E study underway • $30 to $36M needed to fund Design in Cost Feasible Plan • Right-of-Way & Construction Unfunded • Seek Additional Funding through: • Next SIS Plan - TRIP • Federal Earmark(s) - Private Sources • Toll Revenues

  19. Total Funding = $1,320 M (YOE) DRAFT

  20. DRAFT * Assumes operating needs phased in over life of plan

  21. Funding Set-Aside for Other Projects • $80 M reserved for 2016 - 2035 • For Congestion Management Projects, to be determined: • Sidewalk Projects • Multi-Use Trail Projects • Intersection Improvements • Intelligent Transportation System Enhancements

  22. Questions / Comments • Action Requested: Approve Draft Cost Feasible Plan for Public Distribution & Feedback • The Citizens and Technical Advisory Committees recommend that the TPO Board approve the 2035 MVP Draft Cost Feasible Plan.

  23. End Presentation

  24. Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology

  25. Non-SIS Project Evaluation Criteria & Scoring Methodology (Cont’d.) • Environmental Screening GIS Tool Used to Evaluate Potential Degree of Effect on Natural & Man-Made Environment • Analyzed project impact within 500’ buffer • Scores based on # of features found or % of buffer area falling within: Wetland Areas Recreational Areas Wildlife & Habitat Areas Prime Farmlands Flood Hazard Areas Historic/Arch. Sites Special Areas (e.g. Green Swamp Contaminated Sites

  26. Non-SIS Road Project Prioritization (cont’d) • Relative Weight (%) assigned to each category divided by maximum points for that category to arrive at weighted scores • Ranking based on weighted scores • Ranked project list divided into Tiers I, II and III

  27. Yellow indicates Change Since March

  28. Yellow indicates Change Since March

  29. FDOT Costing Tool Examples

  30. Preliminary Cost Estimates (2010 $) * Annual Operating Costs At Build-Out

More Related