200 likes | 344 Views
HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Electrical and Communications Engineering. Analysis of a 1.7 MVA Doubly Fed Wind-Power Induction Generator during Power Systems Disturbances. Slavomir Seman, Sami Kanerva, Antero Arkkio Laboratory of Electromechanics
E N D
HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGYDepartment of Electrical and Communications Engineering Analysis of a 1.7 MVA Doubly Fed Wind-Power Induction Generator during Power Systems Disturbances Slavomir Seman, Sami Kanerva, Antero Arkkio Laboratory of Electromechanics Helsinki University of Technology Jouko Niiranen ABB Oy, Finland
Overview • Introduction • The Doubly Fed Induction Generator • Frequency Converter and Control • Crowbar • Modeling of The Network, Transformer and Transmission Line • Simulation Results • Conclusions
The Doubly Fed Induction Generator • Transient Model of the Generator • The machine equations x-y reference frame fixed with rotor • Constant speed - no equation of movement included P N 1.7 MW UN, stator (L-L) 690 V (delta) Umax, rotor 2472 V (star) n N 1500 rpm f N, stator 50 Hz
Frequency Converter and Control • Model of the Frequency Converter • Two back-to-back connected voltage source inverters (VSI) • DTC • The Network Side Converter - simplification 1-st order filter transfer function • PI controller Udc -level
The Rotor Side Converter • Model of the Rotor Side Converter • Modified DTC • Input demanded PF or Q , Tref • Voltage vector applied - optimal switching table • The tangential component of the voltage vector controls the torque whereas the radial component increases or decreases the flux magnitude
Over-Current Protection - Crowbar • Passive Crowbar • over-current protection - the rotor, rotor side converter • no chopper mode • disconnection of the converter rotor is connected to CB • CB is active until MCB disconnects stator from the network
Modeling of the Network, Transformer and Transmission Line • Modelling of test set-up • Power supply - SG or 3-phase V source with short circuit reactance and inductance • Transmission line - R-L equivalent circuit • Transformer - short circuit R-L and stray C, no saturation • Short circuiting TR - R-L equivalent circuit
Voltage dip applied MCB open Simulation Results - Voltage Dip without Crowbar Matlab-Simulink, t_step = 0.5e-7, T_ref =0.5 p.u., w_ref = 1.067 p.u., Voltage dip 35% Un
Voltage dip applied MCB open Simulation Results - Voltage Dip without Crowbar
Voltage dip applied MCB open Simulation Results - Voltage Dip with Passive Crowbar Matlab-Simulink, t_step = 0.5e-7, T_ref =0.5 p.u., w_ref = 1.067 p.u., Voltage dip 35% Un
Voltage dip applied MCB open Simulation Results - Voltage Dip with Passive Crowbar
Conclusions • Transient behaviour of DTC controlled DFIG for wind-power applications studied. • The transient simulation results with and without crowbar were compared. • When the crowbar is implemented, the stator and rotor transient current decay rapidly and rotor circuit is properly protected. • Transient electromagnetic torque is reduced by means of crowbar but oscillates longer than in case without crowbar.