200 likes | 229 Views
Teaching Online in Higher Education. An Online Workshop in Online Pedagogy. Douglas Young University of Texas-Pan American. Problem. Growing regional need for Higher Education Training faculty in WebCT No growth in number of courses. Problem. No model how to teach online
E N D
Teaching Onlinein Higher Education An Online Workshop in Online Pedagogy Douglas Young University of Texas-Pan American
Problem • Growing regional need for Higher Education • Training faculty in WebCT • No growth in number of courses
Problem • No model how to teach online • Software training not enough • New workshop
Genesis • No Lecture Online • Web Site Model • Cannot Answer All Questions • Asynchronous: Student May Answer Questions First
GenesisFour Principles • Immersion as Students • Interaction as Key • Design Courses • Modify Teaching Behavior
GenesisOther Guidelines • No Pedagogical Buzzwords • Not “Computer Jocks” • Practical, with Some Theory
Immersion as Students • Do It to Learn It • Computer skills • Increase Skills Progressively • Be able to answer student questions
Interaction Alecture is a process where information is passed from the notebook of the lecturer to the notebook of the student without necessarily passing through the minds of either. Anonymous Educator’s Signature File
Interaction • Michael Moore’s Three Levels of Interaction • Instructor/Learner • Learner/Content • Learner/Learner
Discussion Email Tests Portfolio Assessments Glossary Chat Telephone Graphics & Photos Web Search Interaction Tools
Interaction What Other Interaction Tools are Available? How Often?
Learning Styles • Teaching Styles = Learning Style • What is one’s Learning Style • Keep it “Interactive”
Learner-Centered • Is the student really responsible for his/her own learning? • Instructor-centered model • Too much work • Students Need Structure • Sage/Guide
Techniques • Graded Participation • Peer-critique • Guest Speaker • Sequenced Skills
Spanish TOL • Response to Demand • First Session Began May 6 • Current Session – September 9 – October 21, 2002
Outcomes • Drop Outs • 31% finished – skewed by UTPA, otherwise 35% • More Work • Time Management • Computer Skills • Correlation to Cost
Outcomes Did it Change Behaviors?
Conclusion • 265 people from 40 schools have attended. • Favorable feedback, but no hard data.
Douglas Young dayoung@panam.edu cdl.panam.edu Thanx!