110 likes | 231 Views
33rd APEC Transportation Working Group Tokyo, Japan October 10-14 2010. Title: The Australian Port Wide Risk Assessment Experience Presenter’s Name : Stephen Burnett Economy: Australia. JAPAN 2010. 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010. Introduction
E N D
33rd APEC Transportation Working Group Tokyo, Japan October 10-14 2010 Title: The Australian Port Wide Risk Assessment Experience Presenter’s Name: Stephen Burnett Economy: Australia
JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 • Introduction • The typical Australian port • History of Australia’s port wide risk assessment (PWRA) process • What is a PWRA? • Advantages of the PWRA • Challenges and issues • Conclusion
ISPS Code Part A section 15: Port facility security assessment 15.1 The port facility security assessment is an essential and integral part of the process of developing and updating the port facility security plan. 15.2 The port facility security assessment shall be carried out by the Contracting Government within whose territory the port facility is located. …
Port Botany tenants as at 1 October 2007: A Austate Logistics BVopak Terminals C Orica Australia D Elgas E Terminals F Origin Energy G Patrick Port Services H P&O Trans Australia I DP World J Patrick Stevedores K Caltex Australia L Svitzer M Australian Customs Service N Warehouse Solutions International ORandwick City Council P PW Towage Q Vacant 1-6: Berth numbers
COMMUNICATE AND CONSULT ESTABLISH THE CONTEXT MONITOR AND REVIEW RISK ASSESSMENT IDENTIFY RISKS ANALYSE RISKS EVALUATE RISKS TREAT RISKS Source: AS/NZS 4360:2004 Risk Management Process – Overview, page 9
Source: Port Wide Risk Assessments – OTS Good Practice Guide, page 5
JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Advantages of PWRA • Integrated approach. • Improved coordination of risk mitigation. • Minimised vulnerabilities at port boundaries. • Improved communication between maritime industry participants. • Shared resources. • Increased operational capability.
JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Challenges and issues • Reluctance to participate due to potential for risk identification to lead to increased insurance costs. • Shared risk leads to diffused accountability. • Ports are not homogenous and cannot be treated as such.
JAPAN 2010 33rd APEC Transportation Working Group, Tokyo, Japan, October 10-14 2010 Image: www.shippingstocksblog.com Questions Questions?