1 / 6

April 2013

MSA Issues in the Mid-Atlantic: Topics and questions for consideration during potential reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. April 2013. National Standards. Which ones have predominance? Should there be a National Standard for habitat? Are MSA and NEPA sufficiently aligned?

blaise
Download Presentation

April 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MSA Issues in the Mid-Atlantic: Topics and questions for consideration during potential reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act April 2013

  2. National Standards • Which ones have predominance? • Should there be a National Standard for habitat? • Are MSA and NEPA sufficiently aligned? • Is the definition of fishing communities too narrow? • Do we need a National Standard for ecosystems?

  3. Interpretation of National Standards • Law vs. National Standard Guidelines—does the law provide enough guidance, or is too much left to be defined in the guidelines? • How should OY relate to ABC/ACL/ACT

  4. Other Issues • Ecosystem vs. Single-Species Management • Is the current law too geared toward single-species management? • National Ocean Policy • Disconnect between MSA and the NOP? • Review restriction on RPB membership

  5. Other Issues Climate change and shifting fish populations • Should state memberships on the RFMCs be reevaluated? Which states should belong to what Councils? Other Representation and Governance Issues - Exploring opportunities to allow states or regions to vote on fisheries-specific actions (specs, frameworks, Amendments) in which they have a significant interest but are not represented on the managing Council. (e.g. Rhode Island Squid, Virginia and New Jersey Scallops).

  6. Resources/Funding • Monitoring funding options • Science funding • How should funds be distributed for data collection, stock assessments, and cooperative research? • Separation of the Councils from NMFS • Should Councils have a separate line in the federal budget? • Fishery disaster relief • Lessons learned from Hurricane Sandy • How should the system work in the future?

More Related