120 likes | 141 Views
Explore Norway's successful budget management strategies, including oil assets, fiscal rules, Cabinet involvement, Parliament's role, decentralized administration, and slow progress in performance systems. Learn how Norway's unique political consensus shapes its budgeting approach.
E N D
BUDGETING IN NORWAY 27thAnnual Meeting of Senior Budget OfficialsSydney, June 5th 2006 Teresa Curristine, Budgeting and Public Expenditures Division, Public Governance Directorate, OECD
Three things to know… • Prosperous country with large oil reserves • In 2004, ranked 3rd among OECD countries in terms of GDP per capita • In 2005, UN index named Norway most liveable country in the world • Relatively large public sector • Public sector expenditure makes up 56% of mainland GDP • Wide Political Consensus • History of minority governments
In Brief…. • Successful management of oil assets • Medium-term deficit rule • Strong role for Cabinet in budget process • Strong formal role for Parliament • Decentralised public administration • Slow progress with government-wide system of performance
Successful Management of Oil Assets • Avoided mistakes of some other oil-rich nations • Established Government Pension Fund - Global(previously called Petroleum Fund ) • Unique example of long-term budgetary planning
Fiscal rule • Medium-term deficit rule, stating that structural non-oil budget deficit should be kept at 4% (the assumed long-run real rate of return) of the assets of the Government Pension Fund • 4% rule never actually adhered to • Widespread political consensus
Strong Role for Cabinet • Cabinet Government • Cabinet plays central role in budget formulation • Two annual cabinet budget conferences • Relatively weak formal role of Ministry of Finance
Role of Parliament • Formally strong role for Parliament • Unlimited power to propose amendments to budget • Power curbed by party discipline and type of government • Ministry of Finance provides objective information to Parliament • But some members of opposition are calling for more independent information
Decentralised Public Administration • Decentralised • Local government plays large role in public service delivery • Central government Nordic model: Small ministries and larger number of agencies • Over 97% of central government employees work in agencies • High degree of flexibility for government agencies • Few restrictions on choice of inputs • Can carry over funds • Extensive flexibility to recruit, hire and dismiss non-senior civil servants
Decentralised public administration(continued) • Individual ministries responsible for monitoring and control of agencies’ spending activities • Ministry of Finance has few formal controls over ministries - limited steering capacity • Informal system works on consensus and tradition • Requires high degree of trust between actors
Slow Progress with Government-Wide System of Performance • Few central requirements • Largely left to individual ministries and agencies • Sporadic implementation by ministries • Limited capacity at ministry level • Heavily dependent on agencies for information • Varying quality of information
Direct/Activity-based performance formula budgeting • Introduced in areas of education and health • Increased activity and reduced waiting lists • Problems due to • Increased expenditure and exceeding spending limits, especially in health • Perverse incentives • Questions about quality of service delivery
Conclusion • Modern budget system • Unique in terms of management of oil assets and long-term budgeting • Strong role of Cabinet • Formal versus informal roles of Parliament and Ministry of Finance • System based on wide political consensus