80 likes | 95 Views
Improving Program Performance in the United States 3 rd Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials Network on Performance and Results OECD Paris May 2006. The PART. Executive Branch Agencies Focus on Performance. The President is Committed to Strong Management Principles
E N D
Improving Program Performance in the United States 3rd Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials Network on Performance and Results OECD Paris May 2006
The PART Executive Branch Agencies Focus on Performance • The President is Committed to Strong Management Principles • Focus on results • Give taxpayers more for their money • President’s Management Agenda (PMA) • Human Capital • Competitive Sourcing • eGovernment • Financial Management • Budget Performance Integration
The PART The Program Assessment Rating Tool (The PART) • Assesses Programs in Four Key Dimensions • Purpose and Design • Planning • Management • Results and Accountability • Generates Objective Program Ratings • Effective • Moderately Effective • Adequate • Ineffective • Results Not Demonstrated • Encourages Continuous Improvement • Applies Consistent Framework to all Programs
100% 6% 11% 15% 15% 24% 80% 45% 26% 26% 29% 72% 15% 60% 20% 5% 26% 28% 40% 5% 4% 55% 4% 50% 20% 38% 28% 29% 24% 0% 2002 (234) 2003 (407) 2004 (607) 2005 (793) Results Not Demonstrated Ineffective Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Distribution of Cumulative Ratings Program Performance is Improving
Distribution of Cumulative Ratings $150B of Spending is Not Demonstrating Results
The Process How The Process Unfolds President’s Budget Inform Decisions Congressional Action Appropriations, Authorization, Oversight Program Activity Assessment (OMB & Agency) Improvement Plans Created Executive Branch Share Best Practices Periodic Reassessment ExpectMore Build Public Trust
Crosscutting Analysis • Grants • Achievement in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math • Food Safety • Small Business Innovation Research • Community and Economic Development