1 / 13

WG-2: Platform Technology Subcommittee on Microgrids and Community Grids

New York State Department of Public Service. WG-2: Platform Technology Subcommittee on Microgrids and Community Grids. July 10, 2014. Agenda. Overview Background Issues Next Steps. Overview – Microgrid Committee Objective.

Download Presentation

WG-2: Platform Technology Subcommittee on Microgrids and Community Grids

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New York State Department of Public Service WG-2: Platform TechnologySubcommittee on Microgridsand Community Grids July 10, 2014

  2. Agenda • Overview • Background • Issues • Next Steps

  3. Overview – Microgrid Committee Objective • Identify the technical and regulatory issues and barriers that need to be addressed to better enable the development of single- and multi-customer microgrids (including community microgrids) in New York State. • Address questions raised in April 25 REV DPS Staff Report and Proposal • Identify issues not already specified in the REV Report

  4. Overview – Subgroups • Subgroups were formed to investigate the following subject areas as they pertain to microgrids: • Regulatory • Economic and Financial • Interconnections • DSPP Planning • Ownership and Control • Intrinsic and Extrinsic Values and Worth • Social, Environmental, and Community Implications

  5. Background – Definitions US Department of Energy definition: A microgrid is a group of interconnected loads and distributed energy resources within clearly defined electrical boundaries that acts as a single controllable entity with respect to the grid. A microgrid can connect and disconnect from the grid to enable it to operate in both grid-connected or island mode.

  6. Background – Examples • Single-customer Microgrid • e.g. NYU • Multi-customer Microgrid • e.g. Burrstone Energy Center • Community Microgrid • a type of multi-customer microgrid where the community is actively engaged in its design and implementation • Stand Alone, Dynamic, and Regional “Microgrids”

  7. Background – Benefits from a holistic approach • Within the microgrid, enhanced: • Efficiency • Reliability and resiliency • Affordability • Environmental sustainability • Grid support • Elastic demand, capacity, ancillary services • Community Implications • Reduce impact when the grid is interrupted • Local enablement • Unique investment opportunities • Ratepayer support for resiliency of critical infrastructure • Private investment driving innovation without risk to ratepayers

  8. Findings • Economics - financial feasibility • Regulatory • Interconnection • Community

  9. Findings Economics - financial feasibility • Value of microgrids not recognized • Lack of opportunity for market participation (wholesale and retail) • Standby rates, demand charges, net metering • Presently, microgrid assets are perceived as high risk financing.

  10. Findings Regulatory • There is a complex interrelationship of NY State law, rules for market participation (including ISO rules), and utility policy and practice that lead to uncertainty, higher risk, and delayed development of multi-user and community microgrids. • The existing regulatory paradigm needs to be modified to further accommodate microgrids and foster mutually beneficial utility interaction.

  11. Findings Interconnections • Approval procedures not standardized statewide • Evolving solutions and standards • Standards (NYS SIR and industry standards) • Control, communications, and bi-directional flow of power • Microgrid controllers

  12. Findings Community Education and Expectation • Leaders and members of communities must be engaged in design and implementation of community microgrids • Education on the process and resulting expectations of microgrid performance

  13. Next Steps Staff should, with members of the working group as necessary, address the specific issue regarding a microgrid developer’s need to seek exemption from Public Service Law to develop a multi-customer microgrid.

More Related