320 likes | 1.18k Views
PERSONALITY DISORDERS. Personality features versus Disorder Categorical versus Dimensional Approaches Overview of major disorders Issues and concerns Antisocial Personality Disorder Borderline Personality Disorder. Definitions.
E N D
PERSONALITY DISORDERS Personality features versus Disorder Categorical versus Dimensional Approaches Overview of major disorders Issues and concerns Antisocial Personality Disorder Borderline Personality Disorder
Definitions • Personality = the enduring patterns of thinking, feeling and reacting that define a person • Personality Disorder = “an enduring pattern of inner experience and behaviour that deviates markedly from the expectations of the individual’s culture” APA,2000 • Must fit both the general and the specific criteria for DSM diagnosis • Pattern of deviation must be evident in two or more of the following domains: cognition, emotional responses, interpersonal functioning, or impulse control • Pattern must be inflexible and pervasive across a broad range of personal and social situations • Must be a source of clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of functioning • Must be stable and of long duration, with an onset that can be traced back to at least adolescence of early adulthood
Ways of Understanding • Personality Disorders are a construct (clinical) used to understand, describe and communicate about the complex phenomena that result when the personality system is not functioning optimally • Categorical Classification (DSM-IV) – Axis II Disorders • Cluster A: odd or eccentric behaviour including paranoid, schizoid, schizotypal personalities • Cluster B: erratic, emotional and dramatic presentations including antisocial, borderline, histrionic and narcissistic personalities • Cluster C: characterised by anxiety and fearfulness including avoidant, dependent and obsessive-compulsive personalities
Contd… • Dimensional Classification: personality disorders are normal traits amplified to the extreme • E.g. Five-Factor Model of Personality: neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness and conscientiousness • Facilitates assessment and research
Neuroticism Very Low Very High Extraversion Very Introverted Very Extraverted Openness Very Low Very High Agreeableness Very Low Very High Conscientiousness Very Low Very High
Aetiology • Aetiology Models: • Biopsychosocial Model: holistic and inclusive • Diathesis-Stress Model: individual levels of tolerance • Psychodynamic theory: driven by the unconscious • General Systems Theory • Aetiology Factors: • Genetic Predisposition • Attachment Experience • Traumatic events • Family factors and dysfunction • Sociocultural and political forces
Prevalence • Varies according to gender, social factors and type • Approx. 10-14% overall • Most prevalent = Obsessive Compulsive, Dependent, Schizotypal • Least prevalent = Narcissistic, Schizoid • Most visible = Borderline, Antisocial • Assumption of stability over time, but some more than others (e.g. schizotypal > borderline)
Major Personality Disorders • Cluster A: odd/eccentric • Paranoid: pervasive distrust and suspicion of others • Schizoid: Social detachment/indifference and limited emotional experience & expression • Schizotypal: cognitive and perceptual distortions; eccentric behaviour; discomfort with close relationships
Contd. • Cluster B: dramatic/emotional/erratic • Antisocial: disregard for and violation of (the rights of) others • Borderline: instability of interpersonal relationships, self-image, emotions, and control over impulses • Histrionic: excessive emotionality and attention-seeking • Narcissistic: grandiosity; inflated sense of self-importance; need for attention; lack of empathy
Contd. • Cluster C: anxious or fearful • Avoidant: social withdrawal; feelings of inadequacy, hypersensitive to criticism • Dependent: excessive need to be taken care of; clinging and submissive • Obsessive-compulsive: preoccupation with orderliness, perfection and control at the expense of flexibility
Examples • Borderline: Fatal Attraction • Narcissistic: The Talented Mr. Ripley, Capote • Paranoid: Conspiracy Theory • Antisocial: Wall Street • Histrionic: Being Julia
Issues and Concerns • Socially and culturally sensitive diagnoses • Can be adaptive? • Gender biases • Clinically arbitrary thresholds for diagnosis (who decides?) • Stigma • Clinical hopelessness
Treatment • Traditionally PDs considered very difficult to treat because of their pervasive, entrenched nature • Psychoanalysis (esp. Cluster B: Borderline, Dependent, Antisocial etc.) • Cognitive Behavioural Therapy • Other psychotherapies: RET, Gestalt, Narrative etc. (individual and group) • Medication
Antisocial Personality Disorder • More studied than any other personality disorder • Origins usually traced back to earlier periods in development (Conduct Disorder), although can not be diagnosed until late adolescence (DSM criteria) • Has the distinction between ASPD and criminality been blurred? Not all psychopaths are criminals, and not all serious offenders are psychopaths. • Psychopathy includes ”shallow, deceitful, unreliable and incapable of learning from emotional experience” and seemingly lacking in basic emotions: shame, guilt, anxiety, remorse (conscience). • Increasing age can bring a change (lessening) in overt antisosial behaviours: less obvious impulsivity, recklessnes, social deviance. Some argue that the behaviours merely go ”underground”.
Causes • Biological Factors: seems to be a genetic loading, esp. Father-son, but outcome strongly determined by environment (adoption studies) • Temperament and family environment interaction: parenting (punitive, inconsistent, low warmth), peers, school • Behavioural and social reinforcers: learned behaviour resistant to change, modelling, consequence ”trap”, peer support
Born bad? • Psychological factors: inability to anticipate punishment, lack of anxiety regarding punishment/negative consequences. Does moral judgement cause anxiety or vica versa? • Consequent participation in risk-taking, self-promoting behaviour with reduced ability to interpret (or pay attention to) nonverbal cues esp. fear, distress, anger, anxiety. Deficit or decision? • Some people ”born bad”? (GSR, emotional responsiveness, empathy studies)
Treatment • Seldom seek treatment • Often coerced into treatment by the legal system, however, participation does not always equate with success • Difficulty building a therapeutic relationship • Very high recurrance of behaviour • Limited success with behavioural techniques
Borderline Personality Disorder • Often present due to other complaints (e.g. somatic, self-harm, anxiety, depression, abuse history). Large degree of comorbidity • Initially conceptualised as the ”borderline” between neurosis and schizophrenia but this no longer the case • Very poor sense of/integration of self leads to uncertainty about personal values, identity, worth and choices = erratic, impulsive and self-damaging behaviour
More cognitive/behavioural features • Fear abandonment and crave relationships but are incapable of maintaining these due to unrealistic expectations and lack of self-cohesion • Subject to chronic feelings of depression, worthlessness, ’emptiness’ leading to self-harm and self-deprecating behaviour (e.g. sexual activity, substance abuse, eating) • May demonstrate dissociation during intense distress • ”Splitting” – tend to see people and events as either all good or all bad, and can shift rapidly between these.
Causes • Biological/genetic: seems to run in families and may be associated with genes that contribute to anxiety, frontal lobe dysfunction • Object Relations: the internalisation of early caregiving relationships (e.g. inconsistency = insecurity & ego confusion leads to ego defence such as splitting) • Diathesis-stress: vulnerability thresholds overwhelmed e.g. by abuse & trauma
Treatment • Perceived as very difficult clients • Therapeutic relationship is key but threatening to person with BPD therefore attrition is high, and therapy is made very challenging • Psychoanalysis uses the transference relationship to interpret and integrate
Dialectical Behavior Therapy • Developed by Marsha Linehan (1993) • Based on strategies of both behaviour therapy and supportive psychotherapy • ”Dialectic” refers to strategies used by therapist to help client balance contradictory needs • Rogerian acceptance is first established • Aim is to become more comfortable with difficult emotions, followed by helping to re-interprete these and then regulate • Other CBT strategies also employed • Contracts are made about self-harm to communicate support without acceptance. • Some preliminary evidence to support this treatment model