320 likes | 487 Views
Electromagnetic radiation from nuclear collisions @ RHIC energies. Outline: Electromagnetic production processes & what they reveal Hadronic and partonic sectors Characteristics of sources Comparison with RHIC data (photons) Conclusions. The information carried by EM radiation. f. k. i.
E N D
Electromagnetic radiation from nuclear collisions @ RHIC energies • Outline: • Electromagnetic production processes & what they reveal • Hadronic and partonic sectors • Characteristics of sources • Comparison with RHIC data (photons) • Conclusions
The information carried by EM radiation f k i [photons] [dileptons] [photons] absorption emission
The information carried by EM probes Emission rates: [photons] McLerran, Toimela (85), Weldon (90), Gale, Kapusta (91) [dileptons] • The electromagnetic spectra will be direct probes of the in-medium • photon self-energy • They are hard probes: • EM signals as probes for hadronic tomography • Need a model for the dynamics of the HI collision
Caution: not all dynamical models are the same… • Microscopic transport models (UrQMD, HSD…) • Hydrodynamic models • Thermal fireball models • Those differ in details (symmetry assumptions, chemical potentials, freezeout conditions, cross sections…) • Need to be constrained by hadronic observables!
Electromagnetic radiation from QCD First approaches McLerran, Toimela (1986); Kajantie, Kapusta, McLerran, Mekjian (1986) Baier, Pire, Schiff (1988); Altherr, Ruuskanen (1992) Rates diverge: HTL resummation
Going to two loops: Aurenche, Kobes, Gelis, Petitgirard (1996) Aurenche, Gelis, Kobes, Zaraket (1998) Co-linear singularities: AMY, Arnold, Moore, and Yaffe, JHEP 12, 009 (2001); JHEP 11, 057 (2001): incorporates LPM; photon rates complete to leading order in αs Can be expressed in terms of the solution to a linear integral equation
Electromagnetic radiation (photons) from hadrons • Details in Turbide, Rapp, Gale, PRC (2004) • Same spectral densities as used for dileptons • Low momentum radiation from thermal sources
Pedestal&flow subtracted RHIC: jet-quenching Azimuthal correlation: • Shows the absence of “away-side” jet.
leading particle hadrons q q hadrons leading particle leading particle suppressed hadrons q q hadrons leading particle suppressed Jet-quenching Dominant source of energy loss: medium-induced gluon bremsstrahlung? However, see later…
Quenching = Jet-Plasma interaction. Does this have an EM signature? The plasma mediates a jet-photon conversion Fries, Mueller & Srivastava, PRL 90, 132301 (2003)
Sources of photons: Hard direct photons. pQCD with shadowing Non-thermal Fragmentation photons. pQCD with shadowing Non-thermal Radiations thermal photons Thermal Jet-plasma photons Thermal Jet in-medium bremmstrahlung Thermal
A theoretical connection between jet energy loss and the electromagnetic emissivity Use again the approach of Arnold, Moore, and Yaffe JHEP 12, 009 (2001); JHEP 11, 057 (2001) • Incorporates LPM • Complete leading order in S • Inclusive treatment of collinear enhancement, photon and gluon emission Can be expressed in terms of the solution to a linear integral equation
E loss/gain: some systematics • Includes E gain • Evolves the whole • distribution function
The entire distribution is evolved by the collision Kernel(s) of the FP equation Turbide, Gale, Jeon, and Moore (2004) Time-evolution of a parton distribution
PHENIX data B. Cole, QM 05
Photons: establishing a baseline Turbide, Gale, Frodermann, Heinz, PRC (2008) in press. QCD @ NLO, Aurenche et al., NPB 286, 553 (1987) See also Gordon & Vogelsang
But: other signature of jet-photon conversion? • Jet-plasma photons will come out of the hadron-blind region. “Optical” v2 < 0 Suggestion & high pT: Turbide, Gale, Fries PRL (2006) Low pT: Chatterjee et al., PRL (2006) All pT: Turbide et al., PRC (2008) in press
Simple dynamics: Turbide, Gale, Fries PRL (2006) Photons from primordial interactions and fragmenting jets All photons (NN, frag, jet-photon conv., bremss., Th.) 0 + - - +
Data: Results from PHENIX T. Sakaguchi RHIC/AGS 07 v2: small! Consistent with zero (within errors)
AZHYDRO (Heinz & Kolb)(c.f. Quark Gluon Plasma III) • Tc=164 MeV, =0.2 fm/c, Tfo=130 MeV • Good modeling of bulk dynamics • Small values of momentum anisotropies • Geometric anisotropy shrinks rapidly
Results: Spectra • Window for thermal effects at low to intermediate pT • Same dynamical model as hadronic data • NO sdditional parameters in the EM fits, over the hadronic fits • The preliminary experimental data is being finalized
Results: RAA The discrimination between models is dependent on the high pT photons See also F. Arleo, JHEP (2007)
Results: v2 sensitivity Some additional resolution with correlation analyses: • Jet bremsstrahlung/fragmentation correlated with hadrons • Jet-plasma & thermal, uncorrelated Good news: high pT photon v2 sensitive to details of initial conditions (geometric isotropy)
Results: dileptons • A thermal component is expected over the purely thermal radiation • Caveat: correlated charm not shown • LHC dileptons: in progress
What next? G. Qin, J. Ruppert, C. Gale, S. Jeon, G. D. Moore, M. G. Mustafa, PRL (2008) in press. arXiv:0710.0605 New: Energy loss systematics in AMY with collisional energy loss (along with radiative). See Guang-You Qin’s poster There is (some) room to re-examine the effect on EM emission
Electromagnetic signals @ RHIC: great results • Important progress towards an inclusive treatment of EM radiation and hadronic observables (more work to do) • Important progress towards an inclusive treatment of jet energy loss and EM emissivities (more work to do) • Spectra and elliptic flow: compatible with data • v2: a sensitive probe • Hope of making more progress with (anti-)isolation cuts • LHC: • Jet-plasma photon signal is also important
RHIC photons: estimates with a thermal model • With E loss • LHC also done Turbide, Gale, Jeon, and Moore PRC (2004)
The current-current correlator A model for the hadronic electromagnetic current: VMD The current-field identity (J. J. Sakurai) Spectral density The photon/dilepton signal can tell us about the in-medium spectral densities of vector mesons. Rates need to be integrated over the space-time history, with some dynamical model
LHC photons estimates Turbide, Gale, Jeon, and Moore PRC (2004) See also T. Sakaguchi, this conference
How big (small) is this? Turbide, Rapp & Gale PRC (2004) Phenomenological Exploration…