180 likes | 336 Views
Biotechnology Priorities for South Africa. Prof. Diran Makinde AfricaBio Cape Town- 14/15 April 2003. Why was AfricaBio created?. Provide biotechnology stakeholders with a platform for biotechnology in SA and Africa
E N D
Biotechnology Priorities for South Africa Prof. Diran Makinde AfricaBio Cape Town- 14/15 April 2003
Why was AfricaBio created? • Provide biotechnology stakeholders with a platform for biotechnology in SA and Africa • To address a strong misinformation campaign in SA media on modern biotechnology • Our experience had shown that there was relevance for biotechnology in Africa • A moratorium would prevent South Africa accessing and testing relevant technologies
AfricaBio’s role • Make available accurate information. • Encourage informed debate. • Promote safe, ethical and responsible use of biotechnology. • Interact with government and civil society. • Interact with international bodies. • Provide education and training. • Stimulate new biotechnology development
GM Crops World-wide • Over 30 GM Crops. • Including the following: maize, soya beans, tomatoes, canola, potatoes, peppers, cabbage,cucumber, squash, cotton, grapes, carrots and chicory.
Global Area of Transgenic Crops, 1996 to 2002: Industrial and Developing Countries (million hectares) 58.7 52.6 42.7 39.1 16 13.5 Source: Clive James, 2002
A compelling case for GM crops • Increase crop productivity and contribute to global food, feed and fiber security • Conserving biodiversity, through the use of GM crops as a land saving technology • More efficient use of external inputs and a more sustainable environment • Increasing stability of crop production to lessen suffering during famines due to drought, unfavorable weather patterns, pest infestations and disease epidemics • Economic and social benefits and alleviation of poverty
Plant Biotechnology in South Africa(New audit to be done 2003) • R&D for over 20 years. • Plant trials for 12 years (using existing policy). • GMO Act implemented in 1999. • National Biotechnology Strategy 2001 • 5 commercial approvals by end 2002. • About 110 plant biotech groups (academic and research). • Over 160 plant biotech projects. • About 45 companies using biotechnology in food, feed and fibre. • Public not informed
National Biotechnology Strategy (Guides priorities) To inform government and other role players about the steps that need to be taken for biotechnology to have a positive socio-economic impact in South Africa.
Implementation Framework(Overcoming barriers): DST • Biotechnology Regional Innovation Centers (BRICs) • BioPad • EcoBio • Cape Biotech Initiatives (CBI) • National Bioinformatics Facility • NACI Biotechnology Advisory Committee • NACI Bioethics Committee • Special Biotechnology Studies/Investigations • Legislative & Regulatory actions • Public Understanding of Biotechnology - FEST • Biological Resource Organisations Network (Biodiversity)
National Biotechnology Roadmaps 5-10 year “strategic commitments Research strategy for building technology platforms in the following areas: • Human Health • Plant Improvement and Development of Novel Products in Plants • Animal Health and Animal Production • Biotechnology in Industrial Processes, Mining and Environmental Applications • New biotechnology platform/clusters • Human resource development strategy • Infrastructure investment strategy • Inform other structures (e.g. BRICS, new agricultural priorities)
Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 Number of Applications 59 79 173 232 Field Trials 54 45 62 49 Greenhouse Trials - 1 2 - Export - 3 22 42 Import - 63 67 98 Commodity Clearance - 6 6 4 General Release - 1 3 1 Commercial planting - - 9 11 GMO Permits applied for and issued from 1999-2002
Control Measures on GMO’s • GMO Act • National Environmental Management Act • Biodiversity Bill (draft) • National Biotechnology Strategy • Regulations on Labeling (draft) • Convention for Biological Diversity • Cartagena Protocol on Biodiversity (2003) • International treaty on plant Genetic Resources (FAO)
Executive Council(Harmonization at national level) • Dept of Agriculture • Dept of Health • Dept of Environment Affairs and Tourism • Dept of Science and Technology • Dept of Trade and Industry • Dept of Labor • Dept of Agriculture: Registrar’s Office
Conclusion • Harmonization in government department and structures in the face of the technology • Build on existing structures • Address funding problems