270 likes | 379 Views
Balancing the costs and quality of different memory service models. Dr Judy Rubinsztein Dr Marelna Van Rensburg Dr Zerak Al- Salihy , Dr Deborah Girling , Dr L ouise Lafortune , Dr Murali Kartha , Prof Carol Brayne. Aims.
E N D
Balancing the costs and quality of different memory service models Dr Judy Rubinsztein Dr Marelna Van Rensburg Dr Zerak Al-Salihy, Dr Deborah Girling, Dr L ouiseLafortune, Dr MuraliKartha, Prof Carol Brayne
Aims • Evaluate average unit cost to secondary care for patients presenting with memory problems in a Memory Clinic based service (Gp A) and a Traditional ( CMHT based) service ( Gp B). • Evaluate quality of diagnostic service offered to patients and carers.
Methods • Adapted Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) • Questionnaire about quality of diagnostic service provided, devised for study
Quality Questionnaire: Diagnostic Assessment Response times for assessment Dementia blood screen Pre-diagnostic counselling Examination of cognition, behaviour, functioning Advanced planning discussions Assessment of risk
Dementia Blood Screen from GP Significantly more in Group A Fisher Exact P=0.02
Diagnostic Assessment: informal Evidence of informal assessment ( NS differences) in nearly all of patients including assessments of 1) Functioning 2) Behaviour 3) Global severity 4) Depression 5) Carer assessment : Gp A> Gp B
Diagnostic assessment (formal scales) Formal assessment Gp A> Gp B • Functioning (P<0.0001) ( BDI) • Behaviour (P<0.0001) ( CBI) • Global (P<0.0001) (HoNos, EQ5D)
Diagnostic info 100% of letters to GP had diagnosis
Copying of letters to Pts/ Carers Group A Group B
Total Costs Pounds Group A Group B
Conclusions • Costs less for Gp A than Gp B but not significantly so. • BUT, Gp A (memory clinic service) can offer a higher quality service with more specialist and multi-disciplinary care.
Outcome of Study • Valuable input to both services re cost and quality of service • Developed useful cost and quality tools for evaluating a memory service • Cost data may be useful to Unit Costs for Health and Social Care compendium • Planning an academic paper!
What did I learn? • In real world, services change and develop. • Neither services are the same as when project done! • Involving staff with data collection/discussion at both ends critical to success. • Similar stakeholder info re perceived quality of services would be useful.
Acknowledgements • *Dr Judy Rubinsztein • ¥Dr Marelna Van Rensburg • **Dr Zerak Al-Salihy, • ¥ D Girling, • *Dr L Lafortune • *Dr MuraliKartha, • *Prof Carol Brayne • *Receive support from NIHR CLAHRC, University of Cambridge, • ¥ CPFT= Cambridge and Peterborough FT • **Norfolk and Suffolk FT
Acknowledgements • Sam Norton (statistician, CLAHRC) • John Battersby ( ERPHO, advice on demographic matching) • Multidisciplinary staff in both Groups A and B