1 / 38

Hip Dislocations

Hip Dislocations. Phillip A. Pullen, D.O. Garden City Hospital. Anatomy. Ball and socket joint The osseous structures are less likely to dislocate than those of any other joint in the body 90lbs of force is needed to distract the femoral head from the acetabulum

boris-ross
Download Presentation

Hip Dislocations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hip Dislocations Phillip A. Pullen, D.O. Garden City Hospital

  2. Anatomy • Ball and socket joint • The osseous structures are less likely to dislocate than those of any other joint in the body • 90lbs of force is needed to distract the femoral head from the acetabulum • Strong capsular ligaments support the hip joint: iliofemoral anteriorly and the ischiofemoral ligament posteriorly • The short external rotators are also located posteriorly adding more stability

  3. Anatomy • Blood supply comes mainly from the cervical arteries at the base of the femoral neck which form a ring • The ring is made up of the medial and lateral circumflex arteries • The capital branches pass through the capsule and enter the femoral head just below the articular surface • The largest of the capital branches are the superior and posterior which come from the medial circumflex artery

  4. Anatomy • Lesser contribution to the head comes from the foveal artery via the ligamentum teres (of sufficient size to contribute in about 75% of hips)

  5. Mechanism of Injury • Usually high energy trauma from a MVA • Unrestrained occupants are at a much higher risk than those wearing seat belts • Direction of dislocation is dependent on the direction of the force and the position of the hip as well as the anatomy of the femur • Anterior dislocations are the result of abduction and external rotation forces • If hip flexed – inferior dislocation (obturator disloc.) • If hip extended – pubic dislocation

  6. Mechanism of Injury • Posterior dislocations occur 9x more frequently than anterior • These occur by a longitudinal force on an adducted hip (fracture may occur depending on the direction the head is forced) • Increased flexion and adduction favors pure dislocation • Upadhyay et al. JBJS 1985 showed decreased anteversion in patients who sustained fracture dislocations and even less in those who had pure dislocations compared to normal control subjects

  7. Associated Injuries • The rule, not the exception • One study, 95% of patients had other injuries necessitating inpatient treatment Suraci, AJ. J. of Trauma 1986 • Ipsilateral injuries that commonly occur: femoral head, neck or shaft fractures; acetabular fractures; pelvic fractures; sciatic nerve injury; knee injuries; and foot and ankle injuries • Posterior dislocations: patella fractures and ligament ruptures and knee dislocations due to direct trauma to the knee

  8. Associated Injuries • Rarely anterior dislocations injure the femoral vessels • An associated injury to the thoracic aorta due to the deceleration typically involved in hip dislocations • Careful trauma evaluation is essential for anyone who suffers a hip dislocation • A high index of suspicion must be maintained for all of the above injuries

  9. Pathoanatomy • When there is a hip dislocation the capsule and ligamentum teres must be disrupted • Labral tears and muscular injury occur as well • In anterior dislocations the psoas is the fulcrum and the capsule is disrupted anteriorly and inferiorly • In posterior dislocations the capsule is disrupted inferoposteriorly or directly posterior (depending on flexion)

  10. Classification • Direction: anterior or posterior • Central dislocation (old term referring to an acetabular fracture) • Stewart and Milford and Thompson and Epstein classification schemes are the most widely used

  11. Classifications

  12. Diagnosis • Position of the leg is key to diagnosis • In posterior dislocations: leg is flexed, internally rotated and adducted • In anterior dislocations: leg is externally rotated with varying amounts of flexion and abduction • Careful exam of the entire LE to r/o concomitant injury

  13. Diagnosis • Single AP view is all that is needed to confirm the diagnosis • In posterior dislocations: head will appear small and lie superiorly overlapping the roof • In anterior dislocations: the head appears large and will lie near the obturator foramen or overlap the medial acetabulum • This AP xray needs to be of good enough quality to evaluate the femoral neck and head, the acetabulum and the pelvis for fractures prior to closed reduction maneuvers

  14. Diagnosis • The rest of the standard radiographic w/u is done following reduction

  15. Treatment • Begins with emergent reduction • AVN incidence increases with delayed reduction • CR should be attempted first unless there is associated hip or femoral neck fracture • The patient should be completely paralyzed to avoid further cartilage injury during manipulation • If this can’t be done (our ER) conscious sedation can be used

  16. Treatment • Closed Reduction: • Post. Dislocations: traction in the flexed position followed by gentle rotation and adduction -- post reduction the leg is externally rotated and extended to maintain it. (Stimson – pt. prone / Allis – pt. supine) • Ant. Dislocations: traction is applied in line with the femur with gentle rotation and lateral pressure on the medial thigh -- post reduction the leg is internally rotated and adducted to maintain reduction • Regardless of the direction, gentle traction should be maintained to overcome muscle spasm and elastic restraints (jerky motions don’t work)

  17. Treatment • Femoral neck fractures can also be caused by overzealous reduction maneuvers • If CR fails after 2-3 attempts it should be considered irreducible by closed means. • Further attempts will just cause more injury to the cartilage and increase the risk of arthritis

  18. Treatment • Irreducible Dislocations • Approximately 2-15% • Usual cause is anatomic obstacle • In anterior dislocations: buttonholing through the capsule, interposition of the rectus, capsule, labrum or psoas • In post. Dislocations: piriformis, gluteus maximus, capsule, ligamentum teres, labrum or bony fragment may prevent reduction

  19. Treatment • Irreducible Dislocations • Must be reduced open • Judet views, inlet and outlet views of the pelvis and CT study should precede surgery • These are to identify coincident bone injury and possible obstructions to reduction

  20. Treatment • Nonconcentric Reductions • Complete and concentric reduction is required • To assess this standard views (Judet, inlet/outlet and AP) and a CT scan (2 mm cuts) must be obtained • On plain films: the joint space and the distance from the head to the ilioischial line medially should be equal to the normal hip • On the CT scan the distance from the ant. Articular surface to the head should be equal to the normal side (.5 mm difference = subluxation)

  21. Treatment • Nonconcentric Reductions • These can be caused by a fragment of bone or cartilage or soft tissue or blood • Since small pieces of bone or cartilage can be missed on plain film, it is essential to get a CT study after reduction of all hip dislocations

  22. Treatment • Surgical Treatment • Absolute indications: irreducible dislocations, and nonconcentric reductions with free intraarticular bony or cartilaginous fragments • Open reduction should be performed from the direction that the hip dislocated • It is imperative that the acetabulum be fully examined for loose bodies before the hip is reduced • Forceful and copious lavage is also useful

  23. Treatment • Surgical Treatment • The ligamentum teres often has a fragment of bone attached to it (can be removed with rongeur) • After the joint has been cleaned out, the hip can be reduced • If an associated posterior-wall fracture exists, stability testing is required • After confirmation of reduction, the capsule and soft tissue injuries are repaired. If the labrum is torn, it should be repaired

  24. Treatment • Surgical Treatment • Nonconcentric reductions should be treated on an urgent, not emergent, basis • MRI may be indicated if no osseous block to reduction is found (more sensitive to labral and other soft tissue injuries) • During the time it takes to obtain appropriate studies the leg should be placed in traction to avoid injury to the articular cartilage

  25. Treatment • Surgical Treatment • Small fragments that are seen in the fovea and do not impinge on the head need not be removed • For small fragments that do not require fixation can be arthroscopically removed • Redislocation of the hip is not needed • Additional vascular insult is avoided • May be used to diagnose labral tears • Regardless of the surgery, concentric reduction should be confirmed on plain radiographs before wound closure

  26. Treatment • Surgical Treatment • The final indication for surgery is an unstable fracture-dislocation • Posterior wall fragments of the same size may be found in both stable and unstable hips • Cadaveric studies revealed that hips with 20% to 25% of the post. Wall displaced were all stable • Those with more than 40% to 50% of the wall displaced were unstable

  27. Treatment • Surgical Treatment • The definitive test for stability is a stress test • If more than 20% of the post wall is fractured, stress testing should be performed • To measure stability: pt is supine, hip is flexed to at least 90 degrees, and internally rotated slightly and a post force is applied

  28. Treatment after Reduction • Strict immobilization leads to intraarticular adhesions and arthritis – avoid • Most recommend a temp. period of traction or balanced suspension until the pain subsides (rarely longer than several days) • Controlled PROM with a CPM and early mobilization are beneficial • Extremes of motion should be avoided for 4-6 wks to allow for healing

  29. Treatment after Reduction • The biggest controversy is wt bearing following reduction. (several days to 1 yr have been suggested) • Prolonged non wt bearing may diminish the amount of collapse in those who develop AVN • A delay in full wt bearing of 8-12 wks for pts with risk of collapse is a reasonable time frame (when reduction took place >6 hrs after dislocation) • For pts reduced sooner, PWB can begin when comfortable and advanced as tolerated with FWB usually becoming possible after 2-4 wks

  30. Treatment after Reduction • Rehab should include: strengthening exercises and proprioceptive training • High demand activities should be delayed until the hip strength returns to normal levels

  31. Outcome • Long term prognosis of simple dislocations: excellent or good in 48-95% • Ant dislocations have better long term prognosis than post dislocations • Outcome for individual pts depends mostly on the development of arthritis or AVN (in their absence, prognosis is usually good) • Pts who did heavy work after their injury were found to have higher risk of a poor outcome

  32. Outcome • Most important prognostic indicator is time to reduction (the longer the time the worse the outcome) • Stewart and Milford reported 88% good results if reduced in <12 hours • Brav reported an increase in unsatisfactory results from 22 to 52% if done >12 hrs • Reigstad found no AVN if reduced <6 hrs • Hougaard and Thomsen found increased rates of AVN and arthritis if >6hrs to reduction

  33. Complications • AVN • Arthritis • Sciatic Palsy • Redislocation • Myositis

  34. Avascular Necrosis • Occurs in up to 1.7% to 40% of hip dislocations and the rate increases with delay in reduction • If reduced within 6 hours, the incidence of AVN is approximately 2-10% • Cause of AVN is thought to be an ischemic insult to the femoral head • In rabbit models, the revascularization commences at the time of reduction • The natural history of AVN varies: usually appears within 2 years but has been as long as 5 years after injury

  35. Arthritis • Most common problem seen after hip dislocation • Reported in 20% of cases • Rates as high as 70% have been observed after open reduction • Most widely held belief is consequence of cellular injury to the cartilage from the impact causing the dislocation

  36. Sciatic Palsy • More common after fracture-dislocation • Usually partial and most often affects the peroneal division • Resolution after reduction generally occurs • Exploration is not required unless nerve function was intact prior to reduction

  37. Redislocation • Uncommon • Reported in only 1% of dislocations • Poor healing of the posterior soft tissues or large labral tears accounts for most cases

  38. Myositis • Calcification of the soft tissues is uncommon after dislocation • It is usually seen as a late complication and does not restrict motion

More Related