280 likes | 422 Views
Optimized Utilization of Demand Response Resources and Utility-Scale Energy Storage in Day-Ahead Energy Markets. May 4, 2012 Kai Van Horn with adviser Prof. George Gross. OUTLINE. Motivation Background Longer-term simulation Market simulation and storage scheduling
E N D
Optimized Utilization of Demand Response Resources and Utility-Scale Energy Storage in Day-Ahead Energy Markets May 4, 2012 Kai Van Horn with adviser Prof. George Gross
OUTLINE Motivation Background Longer-term simulation Market simulation and storage scheduling Key policy developments Future work Concluding remarks
PJM LOAD AND PRICES FOR WEEK OF APRIL 4, 2010 MW $/MWh peak load base load 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 h
GOALS quantify reliability and economic impacts of coordinated demand response resource (DRR) and energy storage (ES) utilization over longer-term periods develop effective methods to schedule storage develop effective methods to determine coordinated ES/DRR DAM schedule simulate over longer-term periods include the network
ELECTRICITY MARKET CLEARING / / total buyer benefits total seller “costs”
LOAD SHAPING MW 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 h
ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM RATINGS Source: http://www.electricitystorage.org
LONGER-TERM SIMULATION storage schedule for days up to market simulation for day sample load and generator availability distributions for each of the 24 hours of day day outcomes
MARKET SIMULATION ES scheduling problem (ESSP) transmission-constrained market clearing problem (TCMCP) ESSP constraints extended TCMCP
MARKET SIMULATION ES scheduling problem (ESSP) extended TCMCP with ESSP constraints Optimized ES/DRR schedule ESSP constraints
ES IMPACTS IN THE DAMs / / impact of ES discharge 𝒹
ES IMPACTS IN THE DAMs / / impact of ES charge
ES REPRESENTATION bus discharge power charge power energy in energy out ES unit
DRR REPRESENTATION bus recovery curtailment cumulative net curtailed energy DRR
ES SCHEDULING PERIOD LENGTH MW h 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168
KEY DRR POLICY DEVELOPMENTS • Requires DRRs be paid the post-curtailment LMP for curtailments • Requires calculation of threshold price by the Net Benefits Test Permits CSPs to bid DRRs on behalf of buyers 745 FERCOrder No. 719 2011 2008
TWO-ROUND MARKET CLEARING extended TCMCP w/ ESSP const. + cleared DRRs extended TCMCP w/ ESSP const. w/o DRR N Y
ILLUSTRATIVE RESULTS IEEE 30-bus system week peak load 420 MW 12 generators, 435 MW total capacity 1 storage device, 30 MW/240 MWh 1 DRR at bus 5, 10 MW Deterministic schedules
NODE 2 PRICES 633
FUTURE WORK Integrate into longer-term simulation framework Lots of studies Impacts of monthly threshold Represent renewables Non-deterministic storage schedule
CONCLUDING REMARKS Energy storage and demand response play an increasingly prominent role in meeting the supply-demand balance There is a need to understand the longer-term economic and reliability impacts of DRRs and ES Consideration of the network effects in longer-term simulation is also important