1 / 12

KIS 2013/14 Winter needs assessment

KIS 2013/14 Winter needs assessment. Initial f indings. Method. Assessed for food, heating and shelter/NFI needs in the KIS Surveyed in all 51 KIS sites Min. of 20 surveys per site, max. of 20 Aimed to cover approx. 20% of households in the KIS

boyd
Download Presentation

KIS 2013/14 Winter needs assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. KIS 2013/14 Winter needs assessment Initial findings

  2. Method • Assessed for food, heating and shelter/NFI needs in the KIS • Surveyed in all 51 KIS sites • Min. of 20 surveys per site, max. of 20 • Aimed to cover approx. 20% of households in the KIS • Results are indicative only – figures for the KIS overall will be confirmed once the population verification has been completed

  3. Results – Food security

  4. Results – Income • Significantly higher average incomes than reported in PDM survey from April 2013: • Ongoing availability of daily labour? • Phrasing of the question (AFG/week, rather than AFG/month)? • Average1 weekly earnings: 915 AFG/HH • Average1 weekly borrowing: 456 AFG/HH

  5. Results – Expenditure • In order of importance: • Food • Health • Debt repayment • NFI/shelter • Water • Education • Other

  6. Results – Preferred fuel • Rubbish results should, broadly speaking, be interpreted as households’ normal behaviour • Clear preference for charcoal at Block HaiQassaba, PD 15 • Should also test for reliance on animal manure in the future

  7. Results – Shelter type • Settlements where shelters with tarpaulin walls (i.e. tents) dominate, ranked in order:

  8. Results – Non-food items

  9. Results – Non-food items • Settlements that were judged to have the poorest shelter conditions (surveyor’s judgement) are: • KartiParwan, PD 4 • Behind Shadab Zafar Flats, PD 5 • Block HaiQassaba, PD 15 • BukharKhana, PD 9 • Ada Mazar, PD 17 • Charahi Lab Jar, PD 15 • Tape Qassaba, PD 15 • HoteleGuleSorkh, PD 4 • SarakePanjProjaTaimani, PD 4

  10. Results – Non-food items • Settlements with less than 2.5 blankets per household (in order of priority) are: • In Front of Tajwar Sultana High School, PD 4 • Sarake Do ProjaTaimani(1), PD 4 • Qalai Wahid, PD 5 • Behind Police Station, PD 4 • Sarak Awal Silo, PD 5 • PuliShinaBagrami, PD 8 • Shahrake Police (ChamaniBabrak), PD 4 • Shahrak Aria, PD 10 • Near Kotal Check Point, PD 17 • BaghDawood, PD 14 • CharahiQamber, PD 5 • Gul Butta, PD 8

  11. Results – Non-food items • Settlements with 2.5-3 blankets per household (in order of priority) are: • Near Charahi Bud Khak, PD 12 • Behind New Parliament House, PD 6 • ShahrakeZakreen, PD 17 • Puli Company, PD 5 • Ghaibi Baba (Tape KarteNaw), PD 8

  12. Recommendations – Non-food items • Major gap is winter clothing for both adults and children • Settlements with poor ratings for state of their shelter and number of tarpaulins should be prioritised for tarpaulins; sites where shelters are predominantly tents should also be prioritised • Settlements fewer than 3 blankets per household on average should be prioritised for receiving blankets

More Related