320 likes | 556 Views
Characterisation of High Purity Metals as Primary Standards for Element Determination. Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und –prüfung (BAM) H. Kipphardt , M. Czerwensky and R. Matschat.
E N D
Characterisation of High Purity Metals as Primary Standards for Element Determination Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und –prüfung (BAM) H. Kipphardt, M. Czerwensky and R. Matschat
… serve as primary standards for chemical measurements (mass or amount of substance of an identified substance) ... used for calibration … to establish SI traceability High purity materials ... Measurement result in field laboratory e.g. copper in tap water traceable commercialcalibration solutions Primary calibration solution e.g. PTB-001 Primary standard e.g. BAM-Y001 (copper) SI
... hardly exist ... usually incompletely characterised using semi-quantitative measurement techniques ... no uncertainty statement Materials certified for purity ...
Target: Primary standards ... ... of high metrological quality ... small uncertainty according to GUM ... serve as national standards for element analysis in Germany (with PTB)
Primary standards of Type A ... ... intended for analyte calibration (i.e. element amount standard) ... certified for the mass fraction of the matrix element in a ‘pure’ material ... for use within the NMIs multiplication to the field via cooperation
Primary standards of type A ... w(E) known to better than 0.01 % ... approach: 100%-Imp ... measurement of all impurity elements (including O, N ...) ... measurement of total impuritiy content (bulk and surface)
LA-ICP MS ET and HG AAS HR ICP MS continuous nebulization check of dissolution step validation additional information consistency check ICP OES, (INAA) FI-ICP MS validation additional information lowering detection limits Gas and Non-metal analysis combined uncertainty (GUM) certified value CGHE; PAA nuclear methods Certification approach
BAM-Y001: overview of impurities w(Cu, BAM-Y001)= 0.999 968 0.000 010 with k=2
mass fraction in mg/kg 100 HR ICP MS ET AAS ICP-OES HE/PAA HE/IR Photometrie INAA 10 1 0,1 0,01 Ag As Bi C Ca Cr Fe N Ni O Pb S Sb Se Si Sn Measurements using different methods
Element Value Uncertainty Upper limit estimates BAM-Y001 Cu 0,999 970 0,000 010 - BAM-Y002 Fe 0,999 862 0,000 044 P BAM-Y003 Si 0,999 91 0,000 07 H, F, Cl, Br, I BAM-Y004 Pb 0,999 92 0,000 06 H, P, Si, F, Cl, Br, I BAM-Y005 Sn 0,999 91 0,000 06 H, Si, F, Cl, Br, I BAM-Y006 W 0,999 81 0,000 10 H, F, Cl, Br, I BAM-Y007 Bi 0,999 90 0,000 07 H, K, Si, S, F, Cl, Br, I BAM-Y008 Ga 0,999 92 0,000 07 H, Si, F, Cl, Br, I BAM-Y009 NaCl 0,999 84 0,000 09 H, F, K, Si, S BAM-Y010 KCl 0,999 83 0,000 10 H, F, Si, S, Mn, Fe, As Certified materials
... intended for matrix investigations (spectrometry) ... certified for very low metallic impurities (typically 1-50 g/kg) Materials of type B
BAM Cu type B: overview of impurities 500 mg/kg oxygen !
primary standards seem to be necessary,- also for analytical chemistry their realisation has been successfullydemonstrated realisation requires a variety of methodsand staying power Conclusion 1
Purity of Nickel with respect to six metallic analytes Quantity of interest:w(Ag)+w(Al)+w(Cu)+w(Fe)+w(Pb)+w(Zn)and interim results; expected range: 0.1 – 5.0 mg/kg Participants: 5 + BAM I, BAM II for homogeneity and IDMS NRC, for IDMS BAM Status: completed CCQM-P62: Background
CCQM-P62: Additional IDMS experiments Because of the inconsistent results in the pilot study, additionally IDMS was applied as ‘reference’: • IDMS for Al is impossible • NRC: Ag, Pb, Zn • BAM: Pb, Zn, Cu, Fe • IDMS is not used to calculate mean of CCQM-P62
CCQM-P62: overview of IDMS results • Good consistency of results for Pb and Zn. • Some experimental problems with Fe measurements. • w(Ag+Cu+Fe+Pb+Zn) = (3,09 ± 0,12) mg/kg [without Al]
CCQM-P62: results Pb agreement < 30 %
CCQM-P62: results Zn agreement 30 %
CCQM-P62: results Ag well agreement, one exception
CCQM-P62: results Cu problem: factor 5
CCQM-P62: results Fe problem: factor 10
CCQM-P62: results Al problem: > factor 100
CCQM-P62: results total problem: factor 8
number of participants low=> limited interest (or ability) concluded discrepancies by a factor of 8 for the value of the target quantity, not covered by the corresponding uncertainties discrepancies based on discrepancies for individual impurities Results for a ‘rather simple task’ => worldwide the characterisation of high purity materials is not to be comparable. few clusters of laboratories can be detected 3 laboratories report rather low values IDMS confirms the lower values for Pb, Zn, Ag, Cu, FeGDMS shows very low value for Al=> may be for some labs the blank is not fully under control Conclusion 2: CCQM-P62