180 likes | 928 Views
William James and Psychology of Religion. James A. Van Slyke. William James (1842-1910) . Considered by many to be one of the top psychologists of all time Principles of Psychology (1890) Classic work in psychology Prominent figure in psychology of religion
E N D
William James and Psychology of Religion James A. Van Slyke
William James (1842-1910) • Considered by many to be one of the top psychologists of all time • Principles of Psychology (1890) • Classic work in psychology • Prominent figure in psychology of religion • His definition of religious experience is the starting point for most studies in the field • Not particular religious orientation, but recognized the value of religion
Varieties of Religious Experience (1902) • Pure Experience • Experiences were discreet episodes that needed to be analyzed as a whole • Introspection – personal examination of experience • Pluralistic Universe • Religious experiences are not based on a common element • Experiences are diverse and disconnected
Varieties of Religious Experience (1902) • Essence of religion is experience rather than belief • Must investigate individual experiences to understand religion • Religion based on individual feeling (Schleiermacher) • Passionate • Emotional • Energetic
Varieties of Religious Experience (1902) • Institutional religion is less important than individual experiences • Definition of religion: • “the feelings, acts, and experiences of individual [persons] in their solitude, so far as they apprehend themselves to stand in relation to whatever they may consider divine” (from Varieties) • Varieties contains a number of different accounts of religious experiences
Varieties of Religious Experience (1902) • James struggled with depression for most of his life • Felt that a religious temperament may help with psychological difficulties • Located persons on a continuum • Healthy Minded • Sick Souled • Religious experiences may help the sick souled • Helpful for dealing with psychological problems
Will to Believe (1897) • Three different Aspects of Religion • Alive – live options that must be dealt with • Forced – cannot be skeptical (example of a marriage proposal) • Momentous – something important to be gained
Will to Believe (1897) • Differences in forms of Belief • Scientific – Rational • May be amended with no real bearing on my life • Religious • Too important to wait before choosing • Seeks out what is good • Any decision that is of utmost importance requires an act of faith
Defining Religious Experience • Highly Diverse, Culturally Distinct • Difficult to Define • May be heightened emotional and unusual sensory experiences • Ordinary experiences interpreted through a religious framework • Communion
Defining Religious Experience • Rodney Stark (1997) • Confirming – Sensing the presence of the Divine • Silent time during a prayer • Responsive – Experience of being helped in some aspect of life • Ecstatic – More intense feeling of connectedness with the divine • Glossolalia – speaking in tongues • Revelational – Receiving some sort of special knowledge from the divine • Prophecy
Mysticism • Non-conceptual knowledge of the divine • Characteristics in Varieties • Ineffability – unable to give a verbal description of the event • “Beyond words” • Noetic Quality – Something life-changing has been learned • Transiency – experience lasts for a brief time • Passivity – Feeling like the experience was out of one’s control
Mysticism • Unitive experience • A sense of union with God • Usually a fundamental part of defining a religious experience • Perceiving a unity to God or the Supernatural • Sense of participation in that unity • Paradoxical • Beyond normal reason, cannot be described • Yet, believed to be true • Knowledge was gained, yet can’t describe what that knowledge is
Christian Mysticism • Long history of mysticism in Christian theology • Often occurred in smaller communities seeking solitude with God • Kataphatic tradition (Positive) • Prayer that focuses on praising the many attributes of God (love, grace, compassion, etc.) • Apophatic tradition (negative or lack of knowledge) • Realization of our own ignorance before God • Any positive statement cannot fully describe the divine attributes
Potential Problems • How do you describe the indescribable? • Religious experiences cannot be completely ineffable • Use language to describe them • Use religious imagery and symbols • Translation • Language differences between psychology and religion • Can a nonreligious person understand a religious experience? • Can someone gain a first person perspective of another?
Potential Problems • Methodology • How reliable is introspection? • Can the subjective be transferred into the objective? • Limited to texts written by others and interviews • Was the experience a true experience of the divine? • Point of view • Theoretical stance will change the way the data is interpreted • Is it possible to be ‘objective’ in regard to religion