110 likes | 225 Views
Centre for Local Economic Strategies. Maximising the benefits of procurement 14 th November 2013, Manchester Matthew Jackson, Associate Director. Our reasoning and activities. Research work fuelled by 3 reasons: Scale of spend Myths around procurement
E N D
Centre for Local Economic Strategies Maximising the benefits of procurement 14th November 2013, Manchester Matthew Jackson, Associate Director
Our reasoning and activities Research work fuelled by 3 reasons: Scale of spend Myths around procurement Intrinsic link between procurement and local economic development 3 key activities: Evidence gathering Shifting cultures Influencing behaviour
Our starting point • The Local Multiplier 3 (LM3 model) • Round 1 – total spend • Round 2 – spend upon (local) suppliers • Round 2 – spend upon (local) direct employees • Round 3 – re-spend of local suppliers upon their own local suppliers and their own local employees • Round 3 – re-spend of direct employees upon good and services in the local economy • LM3 = Round 1 + Round 2 + Round 3 Round 1
Initial work with MCC • MCC spent £357m upon its top 300 suppliers (08/09) • MCC spent £183m upon Manchester based suppliers (51.5%) • £43m is spent in Ardwick • £87m is spent in Manchester neighbourhoods in 10% most deprived nationally • £309m is spent in Greater Manchester • Suppliers 25p in every pound received back in the Manchester economy • Range of wider local economic, social and environmental benefits
Maximising benefit in Manchester • Cross-departmental procurement working group • Network of suppliers • Engagement with suppliers in area regeneration localities • Cost-benefit analysis study with Capital Programmes • Outcomes framework development • Spend analysis for financial year 2011/12 and 2012/13
Progressing economic impact – how? • Service Commissioning • Linking procurement to wider corporate objectives e.g Northumberland • Engaging with communities in design of services e.g Camden • Procurement Strategy • Developing procurement strategies which have a common narrative e.g. Manchester • Developing accessible portals e.g. The CHEST • Packaging contracts to make them more accessible e.g. Cheshire West • Streamlining PQQ and ITT documentation e.g. North Lincs
Progressing economic impact – how? • Pre-procurement • Working with local business to test markets e.g. Manchester • Engagement work with business networks e.g. Preston • Capacity building of SMEs and VCS organisations e.g. Croydon • Apprenticeships, labour and social clauses e.g. Derry • Delivery • Developing Suppliers networks and voluntary arrangements e.g. Manchester • Paying suppliers quickly • Continuous spend analysis and outcomes monitoring e.g. Manchester
Why is this important now? • Area based initiatives have gone • Places operate as systems • Local authorities and the wider public sector are the stewards of place • We face massive challenges • Mainstream tools need to be used more effectively
Maximising the benefits of procurement Finishing off • Final questions or queries? • Ongoing support from CLES • matthewjackson@cles.org.uk