410 likes | 586 Views
Blended by Design: Designing and Developing a Blended Course. Jennifer Strickland, PhD, jennifer.strickland@pvmail.maricopa.edu. 5-Minute University. Program Overview. Format . Topics. Day 1: Blended learning overview and redesign Day 2: Community & Quality
E N D
Blended by Design: Designing and Developing a Blended Course Jennifer Strickland, PhD, jennifer.strickland@pvmail.maricopa.edu
Program Overview Format Topics Day 1: Blended learning overview and redesign Day 2: Community & Quality Day 3: Blended & Instructional Technology • Hands-on, curriculum (re)design work • Team/individual work • Binder resources • http://ablendedmaricopa.pbworks.com/ • Evaluations & Assessments
Learning Objectives • Define blended learning in higher education. • Evaluate a blended course’s strengths and weaknesses. • Design a module for blended delivery utilizing a blended module design tool. • Develop a plan for designing a blended course or redesigning an existing course as a blended course. • Explain the value of community in the blended course. • Identify quality assurance principles and practices in a blended environment. • Review and select instructional technology options for delivering blended courses.
Today's Agenda • Overview and Introduction to workshop & resources • What is Blended and what does a blended course look like? • Benefits of a blended course • National & Local Data regarding Blended Learning • Course redesign strategies • Bloom’s Taxonomy and Six Innovative Course Redesign Practices • Mapping your course • Close
Who are we? • Facilitator • Participants • Break into pairs • What is your “signature” teaching technique? • Share
Face-to-Face Course
The 10 Blended Questions As a Guide Throughout
A way to meet Net Gen student expectations • Attractive alternative to Face2Face instruction • A good match for the Net Gen’s visual, exploratory, participative learning preferences • Usually more work to design (at least at the beginning), but improved student engagement and achievement • The best of both worlds Motivation…
The Optimal Model Teaching Opportunities Student Engagement Potential to increase and extend instructor-student and student-student connectivity Discussions started in class may be continued online Students who rarely take part in class discussions are more likely to participate online Integration of out-of- and in-class activities allows more effective use of traditional class time • Allows for many diverse solutions to course problems • Enables the incorporation of new types of interactive and independent learning activities • Variety of online and in-class teaching strategies • Learn technologies while you learn your material
Learned more • Wrote better papers • Performed better on exams • Produced higher quality projects • Were capable of more meaningful discussions on course material • Were better able to master concepts and apply what they have learned • Developed higher-order skills of critical thinking, problem-solving, and the ability to apply theoretical models to real-world data Faculty report that students… Source: University of Central Florida Data, 2007
National data reports The Sloan Consortium
The Sloan-C Definition • What is Sloan-C? • Blended learning courses combine online and classroom learning activities and resources in an optimal way to improve student learning outcomes and to address important institutional issues. • Classroom attendance (“seat time”) is reduced.
More on definitions… • What you call it is not important; but a defined and consistent model is • Blended learning as an optimized pedagogical approach, rather than an arbitrary time division between online and F2F
New Skills: Rethinking Course Design • To develop a successful blended course instructors must • Re-examine their course goals and objectives, • Design online learning activities to meet these goals and objectives, and • Effectively integrate the online activities with the face-to face meetings • Make transition from lectures and presentation to a more student-centered active learning
New Skills: Rethinking the Course • Facilitate online discussions and small group activities • New forms of assessment of student • Scheduling and communication challenges as courses meet online and face-to-face • Work overload for faculty and students • Students need understand their active role in the learning environment
Potential Pitfalls • Fundamental change in teaching and learning • Not just about the “delivery” • Time to redesign • Changes in campus policies • Reliance on technology • “Course and a half” syndrome • Training and support
Why (re)design into blended? • Ensures your design facilitates your course • Engage students in dynamic and vital communities • Students take more responsibility for content and learning • Students learn through active participation and inquiry • Assessing the Role of Teaching Presence from the Learner Perspective Dr. Randy Garrison, Dr. Norm Vaughan. Available at Blended Learning and Course Redesign in Higher Education &http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI07159.pdf.
6 Innovative Redesign Practices • Creating "Small" Within "Large" • Undergraduate Learning Assistants (ULAs) • Freshmen Don’t Do Optional • Modularization • New Instructional Roles • Avoiding “Either/Or” Choices http://www.thencat.org/PlanRes/Innov_CrRedPractices.htm
5 Principles of Successful Course Redesign • Redesign the whole course. • Encourage active learning. • Provide students with individualized assistance. • Build in ongoing assessment and prompt feedback. • Ensure sufficient time on task and monitor student progress. http://thencat.org/PlanRes/R2R_PrinCR.htm
4 Basic Redesign Steps • Identify course content for a module • Write learning objectives and develop instructional modules • Select course (re) design strategies: determining which strategy is most appropriate for your course • Integrate course content activities in classroom and online environments: determining what is best suited in either the online or classroom environment
Why Objectives? • Clear statement of what students will be able to do when they are finished with an instructional component • Focuses on student performance • Provides structure: beginning, middle, and end • What are the core concepts your students must learn for each module? • What do they need to know? • What do they need to be able to do? • What will they know as a result of my instruction?
Support Objectives by • Integrating learning technologies • Classroom technologies • Emerging technologies • Online resources • Developing diverse assessment techniques • Infusing active learning, interaction, and peer engagement
Why Modules? • Easier to find course content • Support consistency • Allows students to focus on content rather than form • Content becomes manageable • Prevents information overload • “7 +/-2 rule” Source: Blending In, March 2007
Meeting Objectives • Source: Blending In, March 2007
Course Organization • Dates • Topic • Readings • Section • Unit • Module
The Organization • Course content broken down into “chunks” • Course structure in a repetitive manner allowing for easy navigation • Content organized in conceptually related blocks • Consistent, logical, clear, common sense, apply past experience, let the content set the chunks Source: Blending In, March 2007
Bloom’s Taxonomy Focus on learner Focus on measure of learning
Mapping Your Course • Handout: Mapping your Course • Map out your face-2-face course from the syllabus and/or other course documents • Identify the chunks in your course via the topics or learning objectives in your syllabus • Select one chunk to work with during the week