190 likes | 440 Views
Group name. Name of the members West Africa Review & Planning workshop. Double-check current plans with the whole team Firm up research hypotheses A gree on some key elements of the design (e.g . RCT) to test hypotheses Who should be part of the research teams ?
E N D
Group name Name of the members West Africa Review & Planning workshop
Double-check current plans with the whole team • Firm up research hypotheses • Agree on some key elements of the design (e.g. RCT) to test hypotheses • Who should be part of the research teams? • Send a team member to UER and UWR (Augustine, Bonny?) • Mali group
Looking at what you developed yesterday, formulate (max) 2 research hypotheses that will help develop the (crop-soil-livestock-market-nutrition) concept note which help answer the AR research design hypotheses? • Plan activities for the next years that help answer these research hypotheses (i.e. research design, counterfactuals…) Be more specific about year 2 activities • Who should be part of the writing and of the research teams? • (If enough time) Who could we partner with? • Ghana groups
INTEGRATION: Integrating technological components into SI systems confers more benefits to small holder farmers than single components • ADOPTION: Integrating technological components into SI systems stimulates adoption compared to single components • TRADE-OFF: Offering interventions tailored to the context specific conditions lowers environmental damage • SEQUENCING: Right sequencing of integration of component technologies provides SI pathways • SCALABILITY: Agricultural SI interventions tailored to local context specific conditions are scalable to other settings • Africa RISING research design hypotheses
Relating to program hypotheses: • Activities (specify in table) • Hypothesis 1:
Writing team? • Specific individuals? • Research team? • Generic functions required? • Specific institutions and individuals? • Who should be part of the research team for hypothesis 1?
Development partners • Other ‘knowledge’ partners • Specific institutions (and individuals)? • Who could we partner with around hypothesis 1?
Relating to program hypotheses: • Activities (specify in table) • Hypothesis 2:
Writing team? • Specific individuals? • Research team? • Generic expertise required? • Specific institutions and individuals? • Who should be part of the research team for hypothesis 2?
Development partners • Other ‘knowledge’ partners • Specific institutions (and individuals)? • Who could we partner with around hypothesis 2?